Why the rash of moderator changes?? - Page 9

Ming · November 17, 2003, 13:43

Quote:

Originally posted by Ming
Uhhhh.... we can look at EVERY IP you and rimmer have ever used...

Just so AH doesn't try to make more of a mountain out of his mole hill... we have the IP address for every post made that is still at Apolyton... If a post no longer exists, we obviously no longer have the Ip address that was used for it.

Alexander's Horse · November 17, 2003, 17:27

In other words you can't prove what you say.

An apology is in order.

Nikolai · November 17, 2003, 17:38

This is quite entertaining...!

Gramphos · November 17, 2003, 17:41

Judging form the all the evidence I say that the only chance you have to clear Rimmer of uilt would be if you and rimmer visited Min in person at the same time and explained enverything

:

Ming · November 17, 2003, 18:00

Quote:

Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
In other words you can't prove what you say.

An apology is in order.

Dream on... it was proved at the time of the incident.

Case Closed. You lame attempts at trolling are just that.

You are the one that owes an apology... and multiple ones since you keep bringing it up.

spartak · November 17, 2003, 18:03

I hope AH isn't holding his breath, or Ming for that matter.

Alexander's Horse · November 17, 2003, 18:49

If evidence is lost there is no case to answer.

Ming · November 17, 2003, 19:03

Quote:

Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
If evidence is lost there is no case to answer.

No... the case was determinded at the time it happened when th evidence was fresh. You attempts to retry a case that was closed a long time ago is just a silly troll on your part. You continue to bring it up as if there was no proof... ignoring all the facts from back then...

The facts were simple and not disputed... you shared multiple IP's... after not posting for an extended period of time, he just happens to post again (from one of your IP's) in the community forum defending you, and complaining about your restriction... right after you were restricted. This was his first and second post back. When he sent me PM's... I checked his IP's when he was online, and they matched the same as yours on the same days. The facts were all proved to the the management back then. If you wish to deny reality... feel free.

The case was closed... because only a moron would try to deny the FACTS. But hmmmm.. that seems to be what you are doing way after the fact... over and over again.

Alexander's Horse · November 17, 2003, 19:11

You lose the forensics and continue to make the these outrageous claims? How convenient.

Tassadar500 · November 17, 2003, 20:07

*cough* *cough* God damnit Ming! You supposed to be a mod :P AH this is for you too.

Ming · November 17, 2003, 20:27

Quote:

Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
You lose the forensics and continue to make the these outrageous claims? How convenient.

Yeah... how convenient that you are whining about it long after the fact...

First... all this was brought out it when it happened.
The "story" as you like to put it, hasn't changed ONE SINGLE BIT over time... as much as you try to make it sound like it has. Proof was provided to the audience that counts... the owners. And guess what, only a moron could ignore the evidence... and come to think of it, you are the only one that has

So talk about outrageous... your continued attempts to ignore the facts make you look silly.

Your claims that the forensics are lost are even sillier. It wasn't lost... like all old stuff, it suffered the same fate as the 9/11 threads... they got deleted. No conspiracies here... just the way old files are dealt with.

So one last time AH... These "claims" are the facts. The same facts as always... the same facts that you continue to ignore... The same facts that were proved beyond a shadow of a doubt to the Judges... ie, the owners, WHEN it happened.

So the case is closed... And since it seems like other people are sick of it... The next time you bring it up in the forums, you will get restricted.

If you want to continue this conversation, do it in private by PM or email. The facts won't change, and I'll repeat the same truths again... but at least other people won't have to put up with it.

So don't even think about posting how it's a cover up... you can continue this in private...

Your rimmer DL trolling is officially CASE CLOSED

Now people can get back on the thread topic.

Kuciwalker · November 17, 2003, 20:55

/me bets that no matter how many moderator changes there are, AH will not be one of them

Alexander's Horse · November 17, 2003, 21:02

Net nanny for a bunch of throbbing teenagers? Highly unlikely. It's beneath me.

PLATO · November 17, 2003, 22:42

So....

Has the release of Conquests started to provide the anticipated increase in postings? The Civ-3 Conquests thread is showing almost 8200 posts. Is this the volume that the owner's were anticipating when they added a new Mod? Did MacUser lose his Mod status when the Mac forum blew? Has the net number of Mods on 'Poly increased?

Inquiring minds want to know! (and get us firmly back ON Topic)

Alexander's Horse · November 18, 2003, 18:44

tis very quiet here

spartak · November 18, 2003, 18:55

except for your spam.

rah · November 18, 2003, 19:26

He prefers it that way.

spartak · November 18, 2003, 20:20

Yes, I suspect you are right. Has anyone calculated how many posts this pro Rimmer campaign has been worth to Horsey?

Alexander's Horse · November 18, 2003, 21:22

I'm sorry, I can't comment on that.

Dis · November 18, 2003, 22:30

you are already a diety. what more do you need?

How about donating some of those posts to the needy? like me.

Ben Kenobi · November 18, 2003, 23:14

Yes, a capital suggestion.

For each post of AHs, he has to give two away to other posters.

Alexander's Horse · November 18, 2003, 23:19

I'm not plus 2ing anybody.

Tassadar500 · November 19, 2003, 01:01

AH do you really want to get a PCR? STOP SPAMMING!

PLATO · November 19, 2003, 01:07

Quote:

Originally posted by Nuclear Master
AH do you really want to get a PCR? STOP SPAMMING!

Even a 10% would still leave him a diety. I really did try to get this thread back on track... Oh well.

Alexander's Horse · November 19, 2003, 01:15

Its not spamming to answer a question NM, so shove off.

On topic, there are way too many mods and people with funny titles around the site. Its getting incredibly bureaucratic and rule bound.

Tassadar500 · November 19, 2003, 01:38

AH, I didn't say that this last post was spam. But most of your posts in this thread are

And the reason you don't like all these mods is because you will get more banning and PCR's

Alexander's Horse · November 19, 2003, 02:15

well no - I've hardly ever been banned if you must know.

I'm a good corporate citizen.

Frozzy · November 19, 2003, 03:39

Talk about being shot down