Thread Tools
Old November 18, 2003, 08:58   #1
anteos
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 12:45
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 56
Railroads
Hi

What does everyone think about the need to have coal to build railroads. In most games I play, even though I have a large empire, predictably I don't have coal as a resource and have to go to war to obtain it.

Also, you can progress onto the the modern age without being able to build railroads? I find this quite limiting.

What does everyone think?

Cheers

Jason
anteos is offline  
Old November 18, 2003, 10:21   #2
KenderBane
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 12:45
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 47
The designers inclusion of coal as a need for rails was probably a reflection of the fact that early rail engines were steam-based and burned coal ... lots of coal ... lots and lots of coal ...

Since running an efficient rail system does include fueling the engines, it did make since to me to include coal as a need for building rails.

The other possible reason is that rails require a special quality of steel that can take the weight of the cars. Since steel is made from iron and coal derivitives, it also makes since this way.


Just my humble opinion, but, if you are entering the early Industrial Era and are having problems winning a 'resource-war', then you may be experiencing other problems. Usually by then, my cavalry are running rough-shod all over my opponents and winning a short sharp war for limited objectives (a single coal icon) is no more than a two or three turn affair (sometimes less).
__________________
Thank god, there are no KENDER in Civ3.
KenderBane is offline  
Old November 18, 2003, 10:38   #3
CerberusIV
lifer
C4WDG United Dungeon DwellersC4BtSDG Templars
Emperor
 
CerberusIV's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:45
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: on the Emerald Isle
Posts: 5,316
In a recent game (archipelago, standard map) I crushed 2 civs early and controlled about 20-25% of the land area by the industrial. I got no coal and had to buy it from the Babs. I managed to renew the deal twice so I had it for 60 turns by which time I had RR'd almost all my tiles, completed building factories and some coal plants in my core cities and my bombers and tanks were ready to roll.

Yes, coal is a rightly a crucial resource but not getting it in your territory isn't the end of the world. If you can't buy it at a reasonable price then you just have to take it. Going without is possible but not good. It pays to ensure your empire contains likely terrain for particular resources long before they actually appear.
Oil is the crucial resource for late game military units and I will go to a lot of effort to ensure my territory includes a reasonable amount of tundra and/or desert long before getting anywhere near the industrial era.
__________________
Never give an AI an even break.
CerberusIV is offline  
Old November 18, 2003, 20:24   #4
realpolitic
Civilization III Democracy GamePtWDG Glory of WarInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamCiv4 SP Democracy Game
Prince
 
realpolitic's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:45
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 875
I think coal is worth paying a fairly high price. With skillful techtrading, I can usually get the money easily enough.
realpolitic is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:45.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team