January 2, 2004, 07:00
|
#1
|
Deity
Local Time: 11:29
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
Doh!
In my game as the Byzantines, I just realized, after over two years of playing C3, that for Scientific civs, libraries are cheaper than temples.
I've always used temples for border expansion... now I need to rethink my build queue.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2004, 07:15
|
#2
|
Emperor
Local Time: 16:29
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: on the Emerald Isle
Posts: 5,316
|
Temples do give one happy face - don't forget that.
Oh, by the way, cathedrals cost less than colosseums for religious civs.
__________________
Never give an AI an even break.
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2004, 08:53
|
#3
|
Warlord
Local Time: 23:29
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 282
|
Well, not for all scientific civs.
For a scientific and religious civ (e.g. Babylon), temple is still cheaper than library.
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2004, 11:29
|
#4
|
Prince
Local Time: 09:29
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: of Central Texas
Posts: 561
|
Even w/ reduced the shield cost of Libraries, sometimes Temples are cheaper due to the Happiness effect. However, if you don't need to worry about moods, Libraries should be first for Scientific civs.
Don't Libraries give 2 culture to a Temple's 1?
 Steven
__________________
"...Every Right implies a certain Responsibility; Every Opportunity, an Obligation; Every Possession, a Duty." --J.D. Rockerfeller, Jr.
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2004, 12:42
|
#5
|
Warlord
Local Time: 23:29
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 282
|
It's 3 vs 2.
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2004, 14:04
|
#6
|
Prince
Local Time: 09:29
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: of Central Texas
Posts: 561
|
Ah, yes. Thanks for the correction, Risa.
*steven8r also pounds head
 Steven
__________________
"...Every Right implies a certain Responsibility; Every Opportunity, an Obligation; Every Possession, a Duty." --J.D. Rockerfeller, Jr.
Last edited by steven8r; January 2, 2004 at 14:20.
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2004, 17:39
|
#7
|
Warlord
Local Time: 15:29
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Aberystwyth
Posts: 232
|
We need a name for widely held, but erroneous beliefs like temples make volcano erruptions less likely
I sugest Apolynism
__________________
"An Outside Context Problem was the sort of thing most civilisations encountered just once, and which they tended to encounter rather in the same way a sentence encountered a full stop" - Excession
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2004, 17:59
|
#8
|
Deity
Local Time: 11:29
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oviedo, Fl
Posts: 14,103
|
Widely held? This the first I had heard of that I recall.
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2004, 18:55
|
#9
|
Deity
Local Time: 11:29
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
I don't think that was an example of a real one, but rather an example of what would be one.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
January 3, 2004, 01:52
|
#10
|
Deity
Local Time: 11:29
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oviedo, Fl
Posts: 14,103
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by skywalker
I don't think that was an example of a real one, but rather an example of what would be one.
|
Got me again.
|
|
|
|
January 5, 2004, 06:39
|
#11
|
Prince
Local Time: 16:29
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 303
|
Temples did make volcanoes less likely in Civ1. There wasn't a special volcano tile on the map, but any city on or near a mountain (you could settle on mountains back then) had a small chance of suffering an eruption every turn - a chance which I think was completely removed if you had a temple. There were other disasters that might randomly strike, too - disease (if near river, avoided with aqueduct); pillaging (avoided with barracks); fire (maybe it was the aqueduct that avoided that one? so long ago)... etc. Just one of the many things in the original game that seem to have fallen by the wayside!
|
|
|
|
January 5, 2004, 13:40
|
#12
|
Emperor
Local Time: 08:29
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: hippieland, CA
Posts: 3,781
|
Full list:
Volcano eruptions, caused by mountains, negated by Temple
Floods, caused by rivers, negated by City Walls
Piracy, caused by oceans, negated by Barracks
Fire, possible anywhere, negated by Aqueduct
Starvation, possible anywhere, negated by Granary
Earthquake, caused by hills, no way to avoid
Nuclear Meltdown, caused by disorder w/Nukeplant, negated by Fusion Power
__________________
Visit First Cultural Industries
There are reasons why I believe mankind should live in cities and let nature reclaim all the villages with the exception of a few we keep on display as horrific reminders of rural life.-Starchild
Meat eating and the dominance and force projected over animals that is acompanies it is a gateway or parallel to other prejudiced beliefs such as classism, misogyny, and even racism. -General Ludd
|
|
|
|
January 6, 2004, 13:50
|
#13
|
Emperor
Local Time: 12:29
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Brasil
Posts: 3,958
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Smiley
Earthquake, caused by hills
|
__________________
'Yep, I've been drinking again.'
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:29.
|
|