Thread Tools
Old January 22, 2004, 18:26   #31
lockstep
Apolyton University
King
 
lockstep's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 1,529
I can live with shield costs (general, not for the JW) of 10, 20 and even 15. But 12 is ridiculous.

NO.

(And that doesn't mean that I don't want another vote regarding shield costs of 10.)
__________________
"As far as general advice on mod-making: Go slow as far as adding new things to the game until you have the basic game all smoothed out ... Make sure the things you change are really imbalances and not just something that doesn't fit with your particular style of play." - WesW
lockstep is offline  
Old January 22, 2004, 18:57   #32
ZargonX
PtWDG LegolandInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamACDG3 MorganC4DG SarantiumCiv4 SP Democracy GameApolyCon 06 ParticipantsBtS Tri-LeagueApolyton UniversityPtWDG2 TabemonoC4WDG Huygen's Union
Emperor
 
ZargonX's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Space
Posts: 5,117
Nope
ZargonX is offline  
Old January 22, 2004, 20:01   #33
Dominae
BtS Tri-LeaguePtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering StormApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Dominae's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,017
Between 12 and 15, I vote 15.

Between 15 and 10, I vote 10 (although this depends on our efforts concerning the Chasqui Scout).


Dominae
__________________
And her eyes have all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming...
Dominae is offline  
Old January 22, 2004, 23:11   #34
Theseus
PtWDG Gathering StormApolyton UniversityApolytoners Hall of FameBtS Tri-LeagueC4DG Gathering StormApolyCon 06 Participants
Emperor
 
Theseus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The warmonger formerly known as rpodos. Gathering Storm!
Posts: 8,907
10
__________________
The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.

Duas uncias in puncta mortalis est.
Theseus is offline  
Old January 23, 2004, 09:01   #35
Stuie
King
 
Stuie's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Philly
Posts: 2,961
Yes to 12.
__________________
"Stuie has the right idea" - Japher
"I trust Stuie and all involved." - SlowwHand
"Stuie is right...." - Guynemer
Stuie is offline  
Old January 23, 2004, 16:21   #36
Nor Me
Apolyton University
Prince
 
Local Time: 16:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 689
I don't think a cost change is necessary on it's own. But I don't care very much and will tactically vote yes because I'd like to see the warrior disabled for the aztecs and that's more likely if we vote the JW to be cheap.

So yes to 12 or 10.
Nor Me is offline  
Old January 25, 2004, 01:29   #37
Zero
PtWDG Glory of WarInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamACDG The Human HiveC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamACDG3 SpartansPtWDG2 Monkey
King
 
Zero's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Halloween town
Posts: 2,969
I vote 10.

Even if you threaten to reset to PTW civ trait, Id rather have 10 shield JW back. Making it 15 just doesnt feel like a UU. Like someone said, UUs are supposed to be better than a generic unit, not an alternative as it is now.

I think Aztec's uniquesness and strength comes from the fact that they have pseudo-3rd traits at a price of good attacking/defending UU. AD1/1 unit isnt really a threat in high difficulty. Im no expert civ player, but i only get moderate success with jags in regent/monarch and Aztecs count on whatever early dominance they can get because they wont experience large boost in GA/UU as other civs.

In single player, whatever cities/territories/boost you get from early warmongering with jags exponentially increases in time to match just about perfectly timed GA with good units IMO.
__________________
:-p

Last edited by Zero; January 25, 2004 at 01:40.
Zero is offline  
Old February 18, 2004, 17:39   #38
alexman
PtWDG Gathering StormCivilization IV CreatorsInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityIron CiversCivilization IV: MultiplayerApolytoners Hall of FameCivilization IV PBEMApolyCon 06 Participants
Firaxis Games Software Engineer
 
alexman's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1998
Posts: 5,360
From the above discussion, restoring the PTW stats to the Jaguar Warrior is a popular solution. Therefore, the following proposal is now under consideration:

Yes/No: Reduce the cost of Jaguar Warrior to 10 shields and remove the prerequisite of Warrior Code. Also, remove ability of Aztecs to build regular Warriors.
alexman is offline  
Old February 23, 2004, 22:15   #39
Theseus
PtWDG Gathering StormApolyton UniversityApolytoners Hall of FameBtS Tri-LeagueC4DG Gathering StormApolyCon 06 Participants
Emperor
 
Theseus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The warmonger formerly known as rpodos. Gathering Storm!
Posts: 8,907
Yes.
__________________
The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.

Duas uncias in puncta mortalis est.
Theseus is offline  
Old February 23, 2004, 23:18   #40
Dominae
BtS Tri-LeaguePtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering StormApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Dominae's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,017
Yes.

Could we perhaps make them upgrade to Medieval Infantry instead of Swordsmen?


Dominae
__________________
And her eyes have all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming...
Dominae is offline  
Old February 24, 2004, 08:54   #41
Stuie
King
 
Stuie's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Philly
Posts: 2,961
Quote:
Originally posted by alexman

Yes/No: Reduce the cost of Jaguar Warrior to 10 shields and remove the prerequisite of Warrior Code. Also, remove ability of Aztecs to build regular Warriors.
Yes.
__________________
"Stuie has the right idea" - Japher
"I trust Stuie and all involved." - SlowwHand
"Stuie is right...." - Guynemer
Stuie is offline  
Old February 24, 2004, 16:35   #42
alexman
PtWDG Gathering StormCivilization IV CreatorsInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityIron CiversCivilization IV: MultiplayerApolytoners Hall of FameCivilization IV PBEMApolyCon 06 Participants
Firaxis Games Software Engineer
 
alexman's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1998
Posts: 5,360
Quote:
Originally posted by Dominae
Could we perhaps make them upgrade to Medieval Infantry instead of Swordsmen?
Why do you suggest that? I don't see an obvious reason.

By the way, I still don't like the idea of reducing the cost of the Jaguar. Militaristic+Argicultural+Ancient UU is already strong enough.

Compare to the Chasqui scout. It costs 15 (in the AU mod) and it has the same stats. The increased movement on highlands balances the terrible upgrade path to Explorer and the fact that the Incas are not militaristic so there will be fewer veteran Chasquis running around.
alexman is offline  
Old February 24, 2004, 18:24   #43
Dominae
BtS Tri-LeaguePtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering StormApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Dominae's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,017
Quote:
Originally posted by alexman
Why do you suggest that? I don't see an obvious reason.
In order to balance the Aztecs. Not being able to use Swordsmen in the Ancient era should couterbalance the Agr. + Mil. + Ancient UU combo you're talking about.

To tell you the truth, I'm moving toward the fence concerning this issue. And with all other things being equal, I prefer not changing anything. Therefore I might change my vote from Yes to No in the next couple of days...

Quote:
Compare to the Chasqui scout. It costs 15 (in the AU mod) and it has the same stats. The increased movement on highlands balances the terrible upgrade path to Explorer and the fact that the Incas are not militaristic so there will be fewer veteran Chasquis running around.
This is why we need to improve the Chasqui Scout! It's a bad unit people, plain and simple!


Dominae
__________________
And her eyes have all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming...
Dominae is offline  
Old February 24, 2004, 20:36   #44
pvzh
C3CDG Team Babylon
Warlord
 
pvzh's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 204
What are you talking about? Ancient UU as advantage?
1. The fact that it is "ancient" is LIABILITY, not an ASSET because of despotic golden age.
2. It is not battle worthy. 1 attack, 1 defence? Come on... Is it immortal or legionary whose strength overweight despotic GA? Whom are you going to kill with jags?

All advantage of jags is fast contacts and some early map knowledge. To be useful in this it needs to be cheap like 10. (I would not bother with 12).

PS. Make Chasqui 10 as well. They do not upgrades to swordsmen.
pvzh is offline  
Old February 24, 2004, 21:19   #45
alexman
PtWDG Gathering StormCivilization IV CreatorsInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityIron CiversCivilization IV: MultiplayerApolytoners Hall of FameCivilization IV PBEMApolyCon 06 Participants
Firaxis Games Software Engineer
 
alexman's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1998
Posts: 5,360
A despotic GA is a huge advantage if you are going to rush your neighbor. You don't even need to use the Jaguars, you can use any other unit.
alexman is offline  
Old February 25, 2004, 01:57   #46
nbarclay
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering Storm
Emperor
 
nbarclay's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 6,676
Quote:
Originally posted by alexman
A despotic GA is a huge advantage if you are going to rush your neighbor. You don't even need to use the Jaguars, you can use any other unit.
That's a very big if, especially when the UU in question offers no real combat advantage to help in the war (as is the case for the JW under the default C3C rules).

Further, Babylon, Carthage, Sumeria, and Greece all have UUs that are available researching no more than one tech and without needing resources. Every one of those UUs offers a significant combat advantage over the unit it replaces in spite of the fact that you seem to consider a despotic GA all by itself a "huge advantage." The precedents of other civs do not bear out the idea that a despotic GA should be considered such an enormous benefit that a UU that can trigger one does not need to offer any other military advantages.
nbarclay is offline  
Old February 25, 2004, 03:07   #47
Dominae
BtS Tri-LeaguePtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering StormApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Dominae's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,017
Unfortunately this is turning into a despotic GA debate...

The fact of the matter is, whether it fits your playstyle or not, a desptoic GA does offer distinct and important advantages. This adds variety to the game. In those games where ultra-early warfare is sought after or necessary, you can bet that the early GA will not go unnoticed (in a positive way). Just because some of us may not like ultra-early warfare does not mean the AU mod needs to "balance" Ancient era uniques. Games rarely last to the late Industrial era, so should we improve Panzers to compensate?

The reason it's imporant to balance civs is that each civ should be attractive to play in some non-trivial circumstances, given all the different playstyles (Builer, Warmonger...) and game types (early conquest, psychotic Wonder-building, Culture victory, etc.) out there. Those civs which are really not good at anything (like the English in Play the World) or are eclipsed by a similar but more powerful counterpart (the Incans by the Aztecs in stock C3C) require special attention.

alexman makes a pretty good case that the Aztecs do not really need special attention. They've got the best trait (Agricultural), a UU that more or less copies another trait entirely (Expansionist), and have great synergy between their ultra-early aggressive UU and their secondary trait (Militaristic). For what the Aztecs were designed to do (early terrorizing of neighbors), they do it very well.


Dominae
__________________
And her eyes have all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming...
Dominae is offline  
Old February 25, 2004, 08:29   #48
nbarclay
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering Storm
Emperor
 
nbarclay's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 6,676
More or less copies another trait entirely? Even at cost 10, the Jaguar Warrior didn't come close. The Aztecs did not start with a free unit to get a head start on exploration, and they did not get the advantage of always getting something good instead of barbs from huts (an advantage that is considerably greater in C3C with barbs more frequent now than they were before). Even with the same cost as scouts, Jaguar Warriors would bring a dramatically lower return on investment because popping the same huts would not provide anywhere near the same value.

At cost 15, there is no even remotely plausible case that the Jaguar Warrior replicates the advantages of the Expansionist trait. The advantage it comes closest to matching is straight-line speed for meeting distant civs, but even that advantage comes at a higher cost. And in terms of the amount of terrain that can be uncovered in a given time for a given cost, both for finding good city sites and for uncovering huts, Jaguar Warriors at cost 15 never have more than a slight advantage over regular warriors and can actually be at a disadvantage depending on the terrain.

I also strongly reject the characterization of the Jaguar Warrior at cost 15 as an "aggressive" UU. My tests clearly show that at cost 15, using JWs aggressively is a terrible investment (except perhaps in certain special situations where their speed lets them do something an archer can't and horsemen aren't available).

Yes, the Aztecs' traits in C3C let them handle an early GA with a militarily useless UU a lot better than most civs could. But ironically, with the UU rendered essentially militarily useless in C3C, the classic Aztec tradeoff of having to either use the UU early and trigger a GA or do without the military benefits the UU could bring no longer exists. The Aztecs no longer have a reason to trigger an early GA instead of waiting until the medieval era, or even the early industrial era, if they would rather wait. The only real time factor is that when AIs get Replaceable Parts and start upgrading older units to guerillas, finding a viable target for a JW to pick off to trigger a GA gets harder.

Nathan
nbarclay is offline  
Old February 25, 2004, 12:13   #49
ducki
C3C IDG: Apolyton TeamPtWDG2 Cake or Death?Apolyton University
King
 
ducki's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Our house. In the middle of our street.
Posts: 1,495
Quote:
And in terms of the amount of terrain that can be uncovered in a given time for a given cost, both for finding good city sites and for uncovering huts, Jaguar Warriors at cost 15 never have more than a slight advantage over regular warriors and can actually be at a disadvantage depending on the terrain.
How do you figure? From Aeson's "On Scouting" thread, the goal of your "scout"(generic term, not unit) is to make contact. Period. Side trips for huts are not "cost" effective. How can a 100% movement increase not be worth a 50% premium?
If you agree with Aeson(I do) that the primary goal in scouting is to make contacts for trading, lower research costs, etc. doing so in half the time for half-again the cost sure seems worth it to me.

I'm not being snarky, I'm curious about your value judgement in the context of the quote.
__________________
"Just once, do me a favor, don't play Gray, don't even play Dark... I want to see Center-of-a-Black-Hole Side!!! " - Theseus nee rpodos
ducki is offline  
Old February 25, 2004, 15:50   #50
pvzh
C3CDG Team Babylon
Warlord
 
pvzh's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 204
Quote:
How can a 100% movement increase not be worth a 50% premium?
Very simple. If terrain rough (you can hardly find a place to use your 2 move), you better off with warriors. Unless you created a map you do not know what is around on the larger scale.

All UU that gets +1 for movement gets it for free. That is the idea of UU. You get a better unit for the same price.
pvzh is offline  
Old February 25, 2004, 15:56   #51
ducki
C3C IDG: Apolyton TeamPtWDG2 Cake or Death?Apolyton University
King
 
ducki's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Our house. In the middle of our street.
Posts: 1,495
But that's true of Expansionist civs also - we shouldn't be balancing the unit to the map generator - there lies folly, IMO, as we could pull that argument up for any 2-move UU to support a boost - particularly War Chariots.

Edit: Wrong button.

Quote:
That is the idea of UU. You get a better unit for the same price.
I'm pretty sure this is not true. Gallic Swords are not the same cost as Swordsmen I don't think. Are Mounted Warriors the same cost as Horsemen? I forget if Chinese Riders cost the same as Knights, but I'm pretty sure there are a fair number of UUs that aren't simply "better unit for the same price", though I've been known to put my foot in my mouth before.
__________________
"Just once, do me a favor, don't play Gray, don't even play Dark... I want to see Center-of-a-Black-Hole Side!!! " - Theseus nee rpodos
ducki is offline  
Old February 25, 2004, 16:06   #52
Dominae
BtS Tri-LeaguePtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering StormApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Dominae's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,017
Gallics cost more than Swordsmen. Mercs cost more than Spearmen.

(It's hard to believe I'm saying this, but) Jags used to be 10-Shield Chariots without the Horses requirement, and they arguably upgrade to something far more useful for a strong opening (Swordsmen). This made them a very unique UU (if I can say that). However, I think they were okay in Play the World (for SP, at least) because Rel/Mil is not exactly the strongest of trait combinations. Agr/Mil is a totally different story. At 15 Shields the Jag is definitely annoying to use compared to what we're used to, but it's nonetheless not a bad UU (above average I would say, depending on your playstyle or goal).

It's not that I think a 10-Shield Jag is sooo unbalanced. Rather, I prefer not changing anything when nothing is particularly broken.


Dominae
__________________
And her eyes have all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming...
Dominae is offline  
Old February 25, 2004, 17:45   #53
pvzh
C3CDG Team Babylon
Warlord
 
pvzh's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 204
Ops... indeed Galic swordsman cost more, but it is an exception because it makes a fast mover able to retreat. Jags are able to retreat, but with attack 1 it is rather irrelevant in the most cases.

NM cost 30 because it gets 2 upgrades +1 off/+1def.

The broken part of jag-for-15-shields is that they are pretty much not usable beside triggering GA. The only use I see for them is prebuilds for swordsmen and medieval infantry (you do not need to disconnect the iron to build jags if you do not trigger GA), but if you can disconnect iron periodically, you can save a lot of shields building warriors, so even here their use is dubious at best.

Maybe, change their upgrade path to horsemen and keep the price at 15? That indeed will make them resoursless chariot (disabling chariots for them). Aztecs have never built a chariots anyway.
pvzh is offline  
Old February 25, 2004, 18:50   #54
Krill
lifer
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamC4DG Gathering StormC4DG The Mercenary TeamC4WDG The GooniesC4BtSDG TemplarsC4BtSDG ImperioC4BtSDG Rabbits of CaerbannogC4BtSDG Team BananaC4BtSDG Realms BeyondC3CDG Ankh-Morpork
Deity
 
Krill's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: of Spam
Posts: 12,935
double post.
__________________
You just wasted six seconds of your life reading this sentence.
Krill is offline  
Old February 25, 2004, 18:52   #55
Krill
lifer
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamC4DG Gathering StormC4DG The Mercenary TeamC4WDG The GooniesC4BtSDG TemplarsC4BtSDG ImperioC4BtSDG Rabbits of CaerbannogC4BtSDG Team BananaC4BtSDG Realms BeyondC3CDG Ankh-Morpork
Deity
 
Krill's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: of Spam
Posts: 12,935
Ottomans get Siphaphi (sp?) for 100 shields
Russia gets Cossacks for 90 shields
If you are going to nerf the JW, then you have to nerf the enkidu warrior, because 1.2.1 has the same problem as 1.1.2. That it is over powered for the price.
(Please inform me if this is wrong, so i can edit the post, hang my head in shame, and leave the forum while you lot stop laughing at the gaff.)
__________________
You just wasted six seconds of your life reading this sentence.
Krill is offline  
Old February 26, 2004, 00:19   #56
nbarclay
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering Storm
Emperor
 
nbarclay's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 6,676
Quote:
Originally posted by ducki


How do you figure? From Aeson's "On Scouting" thread, the goal of your "scout"(generic term, not unit) is to make contact. Period. Side trips for huts are not "cost" effective. How can a 100% movement increase not be worth a 50% premium?
If you agree with Aeson(I do) that the primary goal in scouting is to make contacts for trading, lower research costs, etc. doing so in half the time for half-again the cost sure seems worth it to me.

I'm not being snarky, I'm curious about your value judgement in the context of the quote.
Scouting units can serve two distinct purposes. One is to head off on essentially a straight line in a particular direction in order to make contact as quickly as possible. I'll call scouts primarilly assigned that duty "long-range scouts" because their goal is to travel great distances. The other purpose is to cover essentially every tile near the capital looking for good city sites and setting up to know where resources are located when the appropriate techs are learned. I'll call scouts primarily assigned to that duty "coverage scouts." Scouts can start off as coverage scouts and shift to being long-range scouts easily enough, but the reverse is not true because a long-range scout has to travel all the way back home before it can engage in coverage scouting.

For normal expansionist civs, it often makes sense to have the same scout units do a bit of coverage scouting before they start operating as long-range scouts. Scouts are no more expensive than warriors, so using them for coverage scouting is always cost-efficient (aside from the fact that they can't serve as patrols or MPs when they're done).

But for the Aztecs at cost 15, the dynamics are very different. If two Jaguar Warriors each spend some time doing coverage scouting before shifting to long-range scouting, the time they waste on coverage scouting eats into their speed advantage making contact with distant civs. On many map types (including the always-popular standard continents type), building three warriors, sending two out immediately as long-range scouts, and using the third as a coverage scout could work as well or better because the scouting units start their long-range operations earlier that way. On the other hand, if the first two Jaguar Warriors immediately go off as long-range scouts, that leaves the player with half the cost of a granary spent and still no units dedicated to uncovering good city sites near home.

For the same investment that gives the Aztecs two high-speed scouting units, a typical expansionist would have four (including the free original), sufficient for long-range scouting in two different directions and very heavy coverage scouting. Further, with one scout free and the rest cheaper, the expansionist civ would get its scouts out a good bit more quickly. The Incas would have only three, but two of those would be Chasquis with a speed advantage on the high ground that scouting units enjoy looking down from so much.

I do agree that even at cost 15, the Aztecs have a considerable advantage over other non-expansionist civs on standard and larger pangea maps and large and huge continents maps in regard to gaining contact early. But on maps that don't have exceptionally large land masses, the advantage of the Jaguar Warrior over scouting with regular warriors is only marginal even for the specific purpose of trying to gain early contact.

At cost 10, the Jaguar Warrior's superior scouting ability compared with regular warriors is very useful on all map types. But at cost 15, I don't see the scouting advantages as being anywhere near great enough to make up for the UU's being essentially useless militarily.
nbarclay is offline  
Old February 26, 2004, 00:37   #57
nbarclay
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering Storm
Emperor
 
nbarclay's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 6,676
In the original Civ 3, UUs always had the same cost as their regular counterparts. PtW introduced UUs that either had both an advantage and a disadvantage and had a lower cost as a result (Ansar and Keshik) and that had an advantage greater than one point but a higher cost (Sipahi, Berserk, Conquistador and Numidian Merc).

The Gallic Swordsman is a special case because whether its advantage over a conventional unit should count as one point or two points depends on what you compare it with. Compared with a swordsman, it has a difference of one point. But compared with a horseman, which is probably the closer comparison in terms of how the unit is likely to be used, it has a two-point difference - one attack and one defense. Firaxis decided to base the unit's cost on the horseman comparison, and I think that was the right choice. (Consider that the Mounted Warrior was already considered arguably the most powerful UU in the game and the Gallic Swordsman had better stats, a better path to build units to upgrade to it, and a civ with traits more suited to a powerful offensive UU.)

To the best of my recollection, there is no UU in the game that does not have an advantage greater than one point compared with a conventional unit (even if it's a different unit from the one the UU is based on, as in the case of the GS) that has a higher cost than its conventional counterpart - except, now, for the Jaguar Warrior.

Last edited by nbarclay; February 26, 2004 at 01:15.
nbarclay is offline  
Old February 26, 2004, 01:14   #58
nbarclay
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering Storm
Emperor
 
nbarclay's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 6,676
Quote:
Originally posted by Dominae

At 15 Shields the Jag is definitely annoying to use compared to what we're used to, but it's nonetheless not a bad UU (above average I would say, depending on your playstyle or goal).
I would say that the Jag is only "not a bad UU" at 15 shields for players who view early contact as a major priority and who are playing on a map size and type where the Jag's speed can be put to good use. And even there, the usefulness has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the military value of using the unit in combat.

The last time we found a UU that we viewed as possibly militarily inferior to conventional alternatives, we did a lot of discussing how to do something about the situation until an AU game ultimately showed that the unit (the Gallic Swordsman) did in fact provide an advantage rather than a disadvantage. The fact that the Aztecs are not prevented from building the regular unit instead of the UU makes this situation a little less serious than we were afraid that one might be, but the issue of a UU that is militarily worse than conventional alternatives instead of providing a military advantage is very similar.

(And before you mention chariots again, I find it hard to imagine an argument that I would view as more irrelevant. The chariot is by far the worst joke in the entire game as military units go; people build them for upgrade to horsemen or mounted warriors, but that's all they're really used for. Further, considering the fact that the Enkidu matches the capabilities of a vastly more useful cost-20 unit with a cost-10 unit, there can be no valid claim that there is something inherently philosophically wrong with having the Jaguar Warrior match the capabilities of a chariot at half the cost.)
nbarclay is offline  
Old February 26, 2004, 03:16   #59
Aqualung71
PtWDG Gathering StormCivilization III PBEMCivilization III Democracy GameInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityIron CiversC3CDG Desolation Row
Emperor
 
Aqualung71's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:13
Local Date: November 3, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 7,544
Chariots? What are they?
Aqualung71 is offline  
Old February 26, 2004, 04:07   #60
Aeson
Emperor
 
Local Time: 10:13
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: orangesoda
Posts: 8,643
My view is that Jags are still powerful at 15 shields. The Aztecs as a civilization are more powerful in C3C under various conditions than they were in Civ/PtW, due to the Agricultural trait. They aren't the defacto #1 on Small and Tiny Pangaea maps that they were, but they fare better in other conditions.

Chariots are not a good comparison as they require Horses and cannot pass various terrain, Mountains being especially important when exploring. A 'Chariot that crosses Mountains, Marshes, and Jungles without requiring Horses or the Wheel all while costing less' is actually a rather big advantage for a unit.

Jags role (and excellence) in AI Worker capture and destroying AI terrain improvements can essentially win your landmass and even future wonder races within the first 20 turns. Stealing a Worker or two from an AI sets it back difficulty levels in how hard it is to deal with. Combining that with the pillaging ability can keep an AI from ever becoming a viable threat.

This is the Jags unmatched capability that warrents their status as a UU, and I don't think it's overpriced at 15 shields.
__________________
"tout comprendre, c'est tout pardonner"
Aeson is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:13.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team