OT Babe Thread - Page 5

Kuciwalker · January 25, 2004, 00:45

That's not cool, man.

Ted Striker · January 25, 2004, 01:23

let's get this thread back on track

i think greece is the greatest country in the history of mankind

http://www.missuniverse.com/delegate...ountry/GR.html

Jaguar · January 25, 2004, 02:00

OMG!

Space05us · January 25, 2004, 06:32

Im Greek, really!!!

Im no history expert, but I'd bet that that is the "face that launched a thousand ships"

Potassium · January 25, 2004, 09:07

Quote:

Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
True. We may wish to put a limit on the number of pictures anyone may post per day.

The other rules, such as the type of photos that can be posted should revert to the old rules, no nipple, no hands over breasts, etc.

Well, crap, there goes those pictures of Michelle Branch from Maxim

Skanky Burns · January 25, 2004, 09:12

You could probably post a link though.

St Leo · January 25, 2004, 17:23

Quote:

Originally posted by Agathon
Silence!!! I've just found out that you are a Sidgames scum and a traitor to Apolyton!!!

I am not and have never been a staff member of the SidGames Party.

Space05us · January 25, 2004, 17:37

So what is the official decree on the babe thread? Mark, Dan?

Ming · January 25, 2004, 17:59

I don't know what the official answer is... but I do know that people who try to turn this into a babe thread will get toasted

SO NO MORE PICTURES

Skanky Burns · January 25, 2004, 19:26

Did you mind toasting Zero anyway?

PLATO · January 25, 2004, 20:24

Quote:

Originally posted by Skanky Burns
Did you mind toasting Zero anyway?

That just wasn't right.

Dis · January 26, 2004, 01:20

babethreads only make me horny. I'm against them

Potassium · January 26, 2004, 06:04

Quote:

Originally posted by Dissident
babethreads only make me horny. I'm against them

Says the guy with the Quagmire avatar...

Rasputin · January 26, 2004, 06:10

me thinks this thread should be closed,,,,, Question asked Question answered

DaShi · January 26, 2004, 06:46

I agree.

duke o' york · January 26, 2004, 07:09

Has the question been answered yet?

Ming said we haven't had an official reply yet.

No bets will be paid on until there is an official response!

MattH · January 26, 2004, 11:29

Quote:

Originally posted by Urban Ranger
Ah, the Grand Lord approves the appeal

How is this not an answer?

duke o' york · January 26, 2004, 11:39

Is this what you're claiming as your answer?

Quote:

Posted by his holiness:

these kind of babe pics are ok

I didn't notice the second line that says "now go and start a babe thread lest ye be most mightily smitten by the hand of Mod".

Maybe I lack the faith.....
But no thread has materialised that is detectable by our puny human science.

Space05us · January 26, 2004, 17:54

Quote:

How is this not an answer?

when you assume all you do is put an ass before you and me. (is that how the saying goes?) We need an official yes or no answer, since one of the OT mods (The most merciless OT mod dare I say) has decided that what Mark said is not answer enough. So until Mark od Dan gives us a 'yes' or a 'no' our babe threads will simply locked and deleted. Unless you can convice the OT mods that what Mark said was a 'yes'.

Ben Kenobi · January 26, 2004, 17:55

http://www.apolyton.com/forums/showt...hreadid=107297

Go here.

Can Ming toast this A/C thread, please?

Question asked and answered.

Ming · January 26, 2004, 20:14

Quote:

Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
http://www.apolyton.com/forums/showt...hreadid=107297

Go here.

Can Ming toast this A/C thread, please?

Question asked and answered.

No... I'm not sure if he answered or was just making a comment. You notice he didn't say... Babe threads are allowed again

But what the heck, I won't close your babe thread until he is more specific on whether they are really allowed again or not

Ben Kenobi · January 26, 2004, 22:56

Thanks for giving me the benefit of the doubt, Ming.

devilmunchkin · January 26, 2004, 23:23

i don't think religion has any place in this argument whatsoever. Whether or not it is a sin in someone's eyes is irrelevant. THis is not a relgious website. It's a sid meier website with an off topic.
THe matter at hand is
1) whether or not the pictures are legal (and i'm sure it is).
2) whether the adminstrators of the board feel that the babe thread is a productive, worthwhile thread that they would like to see on their site.

Kuciwalker · January 26, 2004, 23:26

devilmunchkin - don't worry, Markos isn't a Morman like Tass

Nubclear · January 26, 2004, 23:28

Oh bah. I look into the thread and I see a picture with a womans breasts partially exposed!!!
This is beyond "inappropriate"

Bloody Monk · January 27, 2004, 00:04

Quote:

Originally posted by Comrade Tassadar
Oh bah. I look into the thread and I see a picture with a womans breasts partially exposed!!!
This is beyond "inappropriate"

Oh, my, yes. Your fears and twisted view of the human body are "inappropriate."

If you are so offended, follow scripture and pluck out YOUR eyes. Only after you do that will you have any standing to say such nonsense. And then not much. Look in the mirror; there you will find the source of your problem with this. It's all about how YOU think about women. It's folk like you who force girls back into a burning building because they forgot their headscarves. They should die so you don't have to see their bare heads. Good grief.

Monk

DRoseDARs · January 27, 2004, 00:47

Well, if Ben gets his Mariah Car...erm..."Babe" thread do the gay/bi/female posters get one too?

Specifically, a "Babe" thread...not a "Mariah Carey & Assorted Strumpets" thread.

Nubclear · January 27, 2004, 01:09

[QUOTE} It's all about how YOU think about women. [/QUOTE]

I respect women, and unlike some I don't treat them as some object used to climax.

Quote:

It's folk like you who force girls back into a burning building because they forgot their headscarves. They should die so you don't have to see their bare heads. Good grief.

Nice try, but demanding the deletion of a thread containing pictures showing exposed breasts with the person in a suggestive position isn't quite the same as ordering a girl back to her death

I mean, theres one VERY naked pic in there already! I'm sure Markos will agree that isn't QUITE family-friendly material.

Bloody Monk · January 27, 2004, 01:38

Quote:

Nice try, but demanding the deletion of a thread containing pictures showing exposed breasts with the person in a suggestive position isn't quite the same as ordering a girl back to her death

But it's only a small step for fundy knuckleheads who walk around beating on others for their shortcomings. And you originally said "partially exposed" so your current reply is just a weak, nonrigorous flimflam. Stop with the fast shuffle, please.

You are what you are and that is a shame and a waste, for the world out beyond your eyeballs is neither as ugly or as twisted as your mind tells you.

The consensus has spoken of tasteful, clothed pictures and all your scolding will not make that bad.

Monk

Nubclear · January 27, 2004, 01:40

Quote:

The consensus has spoken of tasteful, clothed pictures and all your scolding will not make that bad.

I almost fell for your troll (again), but this is what tipped me off