Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 22, 2004, 23:04   #1
Gluegun
Alpha Centauri Democracy GameAlpha Centauri PBEM
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 12:35
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 32
Suggestions for fixing Air Power?
Hi there... I'm looking for some suggestions for how to make Air Power in Alpha Centauri more fun, gameplay-wise... So far, all I've come up with is making the "Combat penalty % -> Air superiority unit vs. ground unit" 0, and doing something so the AI always builds interceptor units...? So it's possible to have all your planes be interceptors, and it would have to be an attrition war of interceptors to win...? Would that work? Anyone else have any suggestions? What really irks me is a bunch of planes roaming around free over my lands, where I can really do not much of anything to stop them... at least until I get "1/best/Clean/AAA" units everywhere... hmm... maybe moving AAA somewhere very early? Anyone have any idea where?
Gluegun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 23, 2004, 09:39   #2
Maniac
Alpha Centauri Democracy GameC4DG Team Alpha CentauriansACDG The Cybernetic ConsciousnessACDG Planet University of TechnologyPolyCast TeamACDG3 Spartans
 
Maniac's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:35
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Gent, Belgium
Posts: 10,712
Reduce the movement points of chopper.
__________________
Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)
Maniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 23, 2004, 10:35   #3
Gluegun
Alpha Centauri Democracy GameAlpha Centauri PBEM
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 12:35
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 32
Well, ya, but what about the Needlejets BEFORE ya get choppers? Any suggestions?
Gluegun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 24, 2004, 02:36   #4
The Mad Monk
Emperor
 
The Mad Monk's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:35
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Flyover Country
Posts: 4,659
I don't see anything that needs fixing.

Except choppers.
__________________
"We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work...After eight years of this Administration, we have just as much unemployment as when we started... And an enormous debt to boot!" — Henry Morgenthau, Franklin Delano Roosevelt's Treasury secretary, 1941.
The Mad Monk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 24, 2004, 09:47   #5
Maniac
Alpha Centauri Democracy GameC4DG Team Alpha CentauriansACDG The Cybernetic ConsciousnessACDG Planet University of TechnologyPolyCast TeamACDG3 Spartans
 
Maniac's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:35
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Gent, Belgium
Posts: 10,712
I agree with Mad Monk. Having a difference between penetrators and interceptors at least adds a bit of strategy and choice. What's fun in a pure interceptor war of production and attrition?

Oh yeah, something else to make air combat more vivid might be to put the air carrier ability earlier in the tech tree. Say Doc:Ini or so.
__________________
Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)
Maniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 29, 2004, 22:12   #6
GeoModder
ACDG The Cybernetic ConsciousnessACDG3 Data AngelsC4BtSDG Rabbits of CaerbannogC4WDG The Goonies
Deity
 
GeoModder's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:35
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: amongst equals.
Posts: 12,956
Re: Suggestions for fixing Air Power?
I refer to my Marssurvivors scenario on Maniac's link . I did put 'choppers (with low movement points) on Doctrine: Air Power, and Needlejets (with 3 flying turns and increased range) on Mind/Machine Interface.

The idea was that needlejets became some kind of low orbit space fighters capable of attacking halfway the planet
GeoModder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 30, 2004, 05:58   #7
johndmuller
Alpha Centauri PBEMACDG Peace
King
 
johndmuller's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:35
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Capitol Hill, Colony of DC
Posts: 2,108
Gluegun, If I'm understanding you correctly, you're getting harassed by the AI's planes and are struggling to defend yourself, so you may need to adjust your strategy. (my apologies if you are coming from somewhere else.) Particularly, it would help to get Doc:AP yourself, sometime in the same general timeframe that they do by trading or stealing it from them or in the old fashioned way (researching it yourself). Then you can take the fight to them - it is easier to actively take out their planes (like in their base) rather than to defend against them in your territory (although you may find SAM rovers and interceptors to be useful as well).

Many posters here find that the AI handles aircraft in too wishy-washy a fashion - i.e., the AI seems to be reluctant to attack bases with planes, especially when you have AAA and/or AeroComplexes, even if it could knock out your defenses with the loss of only a couple of NJ's. The AI also is relatively non-competitive when it comes to aggressive use of Choppers (hardly ever using the 'Chop and Drop' attack). Mostly, the AI airforce seems to specialize in flying around doing nothing; occasionally picking off formers and crawlers. Consequently, people try to think of ways to diminish the power of aircraft, particularly choppers, to avoid taking advantage of the AI to such an unseemly extent.

The power of choppers does seem somewhat great IMhO compared to NJ's, particularly considering how easy it seems to be for individuals on the ground to shoot them down in the real world. Cutting back the movement allowance of the choppers seems to be a reasonable balancing act, even thought it doesn't reallly address that particular disconnect, but unfortunately that adjustment is one of those things that are driven by the Alpha(x).txt file [i]on each individual's computer[i] and are not bound into the game file for PBEMs, so it would have to be changed on everlyone's machine in a PBEM, which is a big PIA and generally a show stopper.

I've often thought that delaying the onset of Doc:AP would be a good idea, especially with respect to Doc:Flex. I think that this could be easily done by inserting an extra tech before Doc:AP (using Doc:AP's prereq's for the new tech and making the new tech the prereq of Doc:AP). The Doc:AP would remain the prereq for the NJ chasis, but the new tech could release a new predesigned basic Gun-NJ unit (a 'Biplane') that would not be very dangerous, but would still have its uses. Something similar could be done for MMI to further delay the destabilizing effects of Choppers and drop units. I think that such changes to the tech tree are bound into the PBEM files, but I would have to check that out to be sure.
johndmuller is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:35.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team