January 23, 2004, 11:24
|
#1
|
Settler
Local Time: 16:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2
|
What's your favorite Civ to play?
Let's start a post to talk about what your favorite civ is and why. Feel free to be candid and detailed here.
Last edited by USA #1; January 23, 2004 at 11:32.
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 12:20
|
#3
|
Emperor
Local Time: 12:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,988
|
i used to be heavily dependant on the religious trait, but after i broke that bad habit, i just leave my civ choice to the computer as i leave it on random. now i can take any civ they give me
__________________
You don't have to like me, you just have to pay me.
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 12:50
|
#4
|
Prince
Local Time: 01:40
Local Date: November 3, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: at the beach
Posts: 40,904
|
The English, I am enjoying the seafaring side of life.
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 13:20
|
#5
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: flying too low to the ground
Posts: 4,625
|
as of right now, the Byzantines, but i haven't explored all the new civs to a great degree.
__________________
"I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
- Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 13:39
|
#6
|
King
Local Time: 10:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Our house. In the middle of our street.
Posts: 1,495
|
I've been enjoying the Spanish, and Japan is always good, but my favorite really is Random. With the minor nerf to Industrious, I don't really pine for it like I used to.
__________________
"Just once, do me a favor, don't play Gray, don't even play Dark... I want to see Center-of-a-Black-Hole Side!!! " - Theseus nee rpodos
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 13:43
|
#7
|
Settler
Local Time: 16:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2
|
please don't forget to post WHY they are your favorite civs
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 13:46
|
#8
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: listening too long to one song
Posts: 7,395
|
I like most civs now, but the last four games I've played have been, in order, Dutch, byzantine, english and currently Spanish. (hmmm)
With the change to industrious and the SGL and corruption changes (commercial), the traits seem much more balanced to me now.
Actually, I love the dutch. The trait combo is quite powerful, highly developed at home, but able to project power overseas quite easily. And their UU is very handy, a real ***** to deal with in the AI's hands.
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 18:40
|
#9
|
Emperor
Local Time: 12:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The warmonger formerly known as rpodos. Gathering Storm!
Posts: 8,907
|
I like soooo many. Prolly have to be Scandy, though, just for the bloody Berserk fun.
__________________
The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.
Duas uncias in puncta mortalis est.
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 19:00
|
#10
|
Prince
Local Time: 10:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: of Central Texas
Posts: 561
|
I hate to answer questions like this one with any kind of definitive answer. For some reason any type of 'Fav Civ' post makes me think that someone just wants to know shortcuts or something like that.
My personal opinion is that each civ has its own strengths/weaknesses. Some trait combos are especially good on certain map types, some are worse. It just depends upon each player's style of play and, to a (sometimes) lesser extent, the map.
There's no 'Best Civ'. At least not that I can tell here in the Apolyton community. Lots of the posters here, I'm sure, could kick my butt several times over even if I were playing 'The Best' civ and they were playing 'The Worst' one.
It's more of a matter of what a particular civ can do in the hands of which player.
My favorite Civ is the next one because by the time I get well into my game, I start thinking about how I can do even better the next game.
Just my opinion,
Steven
__________________
"...Every Right implies a certain Responsibility; Every Opportunity, an Obligation; Every Possession, a Duty." --J.D. Rockerfeller, Jr.
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 19:12
|
#11
|
Emperor
Local Time: 12:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: here
Posts: 8,349
|
I started out with the French, mostly because that was my heritage. After adjusting to the rather alarming shade of pink that Firaxis chose for my Gallic kin (thanks loads, fellas), I found that they neatly fit my playing style--perfectionist builder, avoiding conflict if at all possible. Com/Ind was nice and simple and easy to work with, and I didn't feel like I had to go out and kick butt with my UU, due to it being practically useless. Wonder GA were no problem.
Now with C3C, Ind is toned down a touch, but I still enjoy the French--the UU has been beefed up quite a bit, but I still tend to be peaceful. Right now, I'm playing my first game as the Yanks, and I am kicking ass like crazy. Exp gave me an early tech lead that I never relinquished. It should end pretty soon.
__________________
"My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
"Strange is it that our bloods, of colour, weight, and heat, pour'd all together, would quite confound distinction, yet stand off in differences so mighty." --William Shakespeare
"The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 20:54
|
#12
|
Emperor
Local Time: 12:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The warmonger formerly known as rpodos. Gathering Storm!
Posts: 8,907
|
Hmmm... Guynemer raises a good point. At a minimum, the question should be framed into styles, e.g.: What is your fav civ as 1) builder, 2) warmonger, or 3) opportunistic?
And to be honest, I just don't have enough experience with all the civs to properly answer those three questions.
__________________
The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.
Duas uncias in puncta mortalis est.
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 21:00
|
#13
|
Deity
Local Time: 12:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oviedo, Fl
Posts: 14,103
|
Guynemer put me in mind of the Reservoir Dogs and Mr. Pink not liking that name.
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 22:57
|
#14
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 11:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ohio...
Posts: 34
|
Well, my current game is as the Scandinavians, and I'm rather new to Conquests, but I've loved it so far. Mmmm, Berserker Armies (helped by being militaristic) versus Pikemen/Spearmen. Delicious.
|
|
|
|
January 24, 2004, 00:46
|
#15
|
Emperor
Local Time: 12:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: here
Posts: 8,349
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Theseus
Hmmm... Guynemer raises a good point. At a minimum, the question should be framed into styles, e.g.: What is your fav civ as 1) builder, 2) warmonger, or 3) opportunistic?
And to be honest, I just don't have enough experience with all the civs to properly answer those three questions.
|
Likewise.
I've also played with the Persians and the Aztecs (random starts), and while I enjoyed both, I had to alter my style pretty radically to play to the strengths of those civs (notably their UUs).
I just don't have enough experience with the others to make an informed comment.
__________________
"My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
"Strange is it that our bloods, of colour, weight, and heat, pour'd all together, would quite confound distinction, yet stand off in differences so mighty." --William Shakespeare
"The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud
|
|
|
|
January 24, 2004, 01:53
|
#16
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Flyover Country
Posts: 4,659
|
As a solid builder, I've always liked the French, the Greeks, and the Babylonians.
Of the three, I liked the strong early defense and research speed the Greeks afforded, which usually allowed me to dominate in games fairly early on.
__________________
"We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work...After eight years of this Administration, we have just as much unemployment as when we started... And an enormous debt to boot!" — Henry Morgenthau, Franklin Delano Roosevelt's Treasury secretary, 1941.
|
|
|
|
January 24, 2004, 04:23
|
#17
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 16:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 97
|
Definitely the Seafaring Civs - at the moment Byzantines, Portugal, England and the Vikings.
When I'm in the mood to be nasty and just go on a rampage I like the Zulus.
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2004, 05:35
|
#18
|
Settler
Local Time: 16:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3
|
personally i think the celts are the best.
The rel/ag combo is awsome becuase the traits come together perfectly for insane growth.
The ag trait means your cities will grow super fast so you can either get a empire of 7-12 pop cities really fast or spew out settlers that can actually use destert tiles in the ancient age.
while the rel trait lets you keep your cities happy with cheap temples and cathedrals (nothing more annoying then having to pump up the lux silder or hire clowns at the start of the game).
Also the UU is perfect for the type of the game the traits work best in. The +1 movement of the gallic swordsman means you wont find your wars suffering becuase its taking too long for reinforcments to cross your giant empire.
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2004, 10:51
|
#19
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 11:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 69
|
Personally, I like the French. I like the combination of Industrious and Commercial (even after the slight nerfing). I also really enjoy their UU, which is even better now. It comes at a good time for me to like my GA.
I do play and like the other civs too, I've put a lot of play time in with the Carthaginians (though not since C3C). I have yet to pay with a 'seafaring' trait, but I expect I'll enjoy that one as well. The only one I'm not too keen on is Expansionist (but a lot of people out there will disagree with me).
There is a reason for me to pick _against_ a particular civ. The Carthaginians (even though I've played them a lot, I don't much anymore, heh), Zulu, Greeks, and many others etc... I don't like having their UU so early, especially a defensive one. It's too early to have a badly-timed GA. Egyptians, on the other hand, I've never built their UU. It expires too soon.
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2004, 11:45
|
#20
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Illinois
Posts: 8,595
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by geniemalin
Definitely the Seafaring Civs - at the moment Byzantines, Portugal, England and the Vikings.
When I'm in the mood to be nasty and just go on a rampage I like the Zulus.
|
Wouldn't you rather be the Mongols if you're in a rampaging mood?
__________________
STFU and then GTFO!
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2004, 11:51
|
#21
|
Emperor
Local Time: 12:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 4,132
|
For demigod level
1) If I'm going to restart lacking the resource for my UU, the Iroquois, who now have alpha at the start, are good and the Persians work well, along with Cleo and her cheap UU.
2) If I'm going to tough it out no matter what, the Dutch seafaring trait and agriculture work well. Early contacts make it possible to get a tech lead and to trade vigorously in the early game, sometimes making life without warmongering barely possible.
__________________
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2004, 13:02
|
#22
|
Prince
Local Time: 18:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 635
|
I´m starting to like the dutch... good traits and starting techs and a nice UU
__________________
You saw what you wanted
You took what you saw
We know how you did it
Your method equals wipe out
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2004, 13:18
|
#23
|
Emperor
Local Time: 12:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,017
|
Koreans.
__________________
And her eyes have all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming...
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2004, 13:22
|
#24
|
Deity
Local Time: 12:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
Byzantines - you have to love those 4-move 2-attack lethal sea bombarding Galleys and Scientific sure doesn't hurt.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2004, 16:02
|
#25
|
Warlord
Local Time: 08:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 236
|
I'm psyched that, having skipped PTW, there are so many tribes to choose from, I probably won't ever come up with a clear favorite.
With the vagaries of the RNG, however, "random" has picked Mongols twice and Koreans 3-4 times.
Playing Mongols allowed me to try out Fascism (though I ultimately went for Democracy and a space victory) and has worked out quite well for the sort of limited warmongering C3C generally requires. I get a kick out of moving my Keshiks along mountains, too.
And I like the Hwa'chaa, which has encouraged me to use artillery more in all my games.
But I recently played a game as the French (which, again, due to the capriciousness of the RNG I had not played before) and had a sort of daring game where I had <1 stone-age military unit per city until gunpowder, and didn't really get a decent fighting force until cavalry. (Said fighting force used to fight one of those "litlle wars" to acquire strategic resources.)
[ok]
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2004, 16:32
|
#26
|
Deity
Local Time: 12:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kneel before Grog!
Posts: 17,978
|
So far with Conquests, I've really like the Iroquois. Agr/Com is good for building, and the Mounted Warrior is good for fighting, making them solid all around.
I've also been playing Greece, who have an excellent combo for SGLs (com/sci).
I definitely intend to check out the revamped Celts soon.
I've played the Dutch and the Maya as well. They're fine, but I definitely prefer the Iroquois.
-Arrian
__________________
grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!
The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2004, 16:47
|
#27
|
Emperor
Local Time: 09:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vincent is back!
Posts: 6,844
|
Even though Conquests has been out for two months, it's probably still too early for me to completely decide. I've spent more time with the Conquests, PBEMs, and democracy games than epic games.
But of the the epic games I've played so far my favorite is probably the Iroquois. I love the hybrid status as it has great builder traits as well as a powerful UU for warmongering.
|
|
|
|
January 27, 2004, 08:43
|
#28
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 16:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 97
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by MrFun
Wouldn't you rather be the Mongols if you're in a rampaging mood?
|
Nope. Firstly, I can't stand looking at Genghis. Secondly, I really like the Impi. It is a defence 2 unit with 2 moves, making it able to retreat or to move then pillage. Impis won't take cities but they can cover your offensie troops and/or defend your own cities and/or run around capturing workers, pillaging and causing havoc.
The Keshik OTOH is a pretty blah unit.
|
|
|
|
January 28, 2004, 01:27
|
#29
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Illinois
Posts: 8,595
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by geniemalin
Nope. Firstly, I can't stand looking at Genghis. Secondly, I really like the Impi. It is a defence 2 unit with 2 moves, making it able to retreat or to move then pillage. Impis won't take cities but they can cover your offensie troops and/or defend your own cities and/or run around capturing workers, pillaging and causing havoc.
The Keshik OTOH is a pretty blah unit.
|
But if YOU are playing as the Mongols, you won't ever have to look at him during the game.
__________________
STFU and then GTFO!
|
|
|
|
January 28, 2004, 02:18
|
#30
|
Warlord
Local Time: 11:40
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2003
Location: beautiful coastal city of... Que te Importa
Posts: 255
|
Before Conquest I chose all Industr. civs, because it was so much better. I have yet to play an Epic Conquest game with the 'improved' industr. trait, so not sure if they're still my fav civs.
__________________
"The Pershing Gulf War began when Satan Husane invaided Kiwi and Sandy Arabia. This was an act of premedication."
Read the Story of La Grande Nation , Sieg oder Tod and others, in the Stories Forum
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40.
|
|