January 23, 2004, 16:35
|
#1
|
Deity
Local Time: 12:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
philosophy about god
I posted this in the Jesus' forgiveness thread, but no one responded to it (it was pretty far OT), so I think it deserves its own thread:
Quote:
|
Well, personally I like this quote:
"Some would ask, how could a perfect God create a universe filled with so much that is evil. They have missed a greater conundrum: why would a perfect God create a universe at all?" - Sister Miriam Godwinson, "But for the Grace of God"
Despite the fact that it's from SMAC, it brings up an interesting point: if God is omnipotent, he essentially defines reality. Now let's see what this would mean if, say, I had this power (just to remove religious dogma from this):
First, I could easily get rid of the suffering of every human being ever to live. I see how that would be a good thing. Well, wouldn't I be doing a good thing to make sure no baby had ever been stillborn or aborted, and instead lived happy, blissful lives? Seems so. You know what, how about I give all of those potential people, who could have been conceived but weren't? I'll stick them in too. Actually, I'll start adding even MORE people, and giving them good lives too. Even better! I think to make the maximum possible goodness, I'll create an INFINITE number of people, all with happy lives. And I'll give them free will, sure, but I'll create each and every one of them with enough "conscience" so that they never actually decide to "sin". Yay!
Bo-ring. What's the point?
Now, obviously, if I created a world like we had now, I'd be "evil". I mean, how can anyone but I be responsible for plagues and natural disasters - I created the world such that they would occur. Have I not "sinned" more than anyone, caused more pain and suffering than every human combined? All as some petty spite for them eating an apple from a tree? If the police did something like that, I'm sure most people here would definately call it abuse. It's like selling drugs on the street in order to catch drug users.
Obviously, our sense of "morals" could not in the least apply to an omnipotent being, because the ultimate result of that is utter pointlessness. Frankly, I'd rather live in a world with conflict than one without. It would be frighteningly dull without it. Just like when you play Risk - the objective is to conquer the world, but you don't keep playing afterwards, do you?
|
Note: I'm still an atheist, I'm just thinking about the implications of omnipotence.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 16:39
|
#2
|
Emperor
Local Time: 01:42
Local Date: November 3, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wal supports the CPA
Posts: 3,948
|
When I've had ten pints, I'm omniimpotent.
__________________
Only feebs vote.
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 16:46
|
#3
|
Local Time: 18:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: jihadding against Danish Feta
Posts: 6,182
|
IIUC, Ben Kenobi posted somewhere that some theologians argued that God could only be omnipotent, because his powers are can only be as high as our human minds can fathom, not lower.
BK then argues that God willingly limits his powers of controlling mankind, by granting it free will. This means, our free will doesn't mean he's not omnipotent, only that he refrains for using all his power.
I think it is a valid theological position.
But this also means, God is a construct whose power is limited by the human brain. In other words, God is a product of our imagination.
Sounds a VERY valid theological position to me
__________________
"I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 16:48
|
#4
|
Deity
Local Time: 12:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
I don't dispute that God could refrain from using his power. I'm just saying that applying morality to it doesn't really make much sense, because he could have made the same restrictions on his power but create a better universe.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 17:04
|
#5
|
Prince
Local Time: 16:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tory Party of 'Poly
Posts: 523
|
but who said god was a nice guy in the first place?
__________________
eimi men anthropos pollon logon, mikras de sophias
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 17:44
|
#6
|
Princess
Local Time: 10:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: falling, once again
Posts: 8,823
|
Well the god created light, air and water, sky and land, fish and bird and other animals, then he thought, hmmm how about we create a new kind, with the form of me and an ability of thought, see what they can do. So he created human. Of course he could have calculated that given all the conditions what an evil world he would be creating, but what is the fun of that?
So he created, and observes, and helps a little here and there. But most of the time he simply observes. You know when a child who is learning to walk falls you don't always go pick him up even if you know that it might hurt a little. But you are doing a good thing for him for you know he'll eventually learn not to fall. Some people never learn how to walk properly is entirely another matter.
__________________
Be good, and if at first you don't succeed, perhaps failure will be back in fashion soon. -- teh Spamski
Grapefruit Garden
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 18:25
|
#7
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 18,269
|
Quote:
|
God is a construct whose power is limited by the human brain. In other words, God is a product of our imagination.
|
Our perceptions of God are always limited by our own understanding, thus while we can imagine an omnipotent being, our limitations prevent us from fully grasping such a concept.
That's the problem with trying to define omnipotence, because we simply do not have any reference points to compare, (in fact, such reference points would be impossible).
All we can say is that an essential quality of God must be omnipotence.
Another quality of God is sufficiency, as he is totally self-sufficient. Therefore, God cannot merely be a creation of the mind of lesser beings, because such creation could not be God. We can grasp the merest portion, a list of qualities that ought to be attributed to God.
HongHu:
Quote:
|
But most of the time he simply observes.
|
Would it surprise you if I said that without God, there would be nothing else? That God continually sustains life? If we are made in his image, a good analogy can be made with a mirror. What happens to the reflection in the mirror when the person walks away? The same is with God. If God were to walk away, we would simply cease to be.
__________________
Scouse Git (2) LaFayette and Adam Smith you will be missed
"All my own perception of beauty both in majesty and simplicity is founded upon Our Lady." - JRR Tolkein
Get busy living or get busy dying.
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 19:04
|
#8
|
King
Local Time: 11:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Halloween town
Posts: 2,969
|
Philosophy about God:
"God is Dead" signed Nietschze, on the bathroom wall.
"Nietxche is dead" signed furious God, on the bathroom wall.
"You're both dead" signed the angry janitor.
__________________
:-p
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 19:05
|
#9
|
Princess
Local Time: 10:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: falling, once again
Posts: 8,823
|
Hmmm, I think not. If he walks away after he made us, well we would still be here waiting for his return.
__________________
Be good, and if at first you don't succeed, perhaps failure will be back in fashion soon. -- teh Spamski
Grapefruit Garden
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 19:06
|
#10
|
Princess
Local Time: 10:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: falling, once again
Posts: 8,823
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Zero
Philosophy about God:
"God is Dead" signed Nietschze, on the bathroom wall.
"Nietxche is dead" signed furious God, on the bathroom wall.
"You're both dead" signed the angry janitor.
|
__________________
Be good, and if at first you don't succeed, perhaps failure will be back in fashion soon. -- teh Spamski
Grapefruit Garden
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 19:10
|
#11
|
Warlord
Local Time: 09:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 131
|
The way I look at it is this:
If there is a "being" outside of our existence, outside of our universe... it ain't bound by the laws of said universe. It is, by definition, everything one has ever seen and nothing one could ever imagine at the same time, because these concepts of 'everything' and 'nothing' are simply states of being, or conceiving, in our universe.
Good, evil, happy sad... none of that factors into it. Anything outside of our existence is unknowable. If you follow most religions to their "end", if you will, that's usually what the message is.
So why alter your life in an uncomfortable way to attempt to please a "being" that no one can even conceive of, or know? That's just silly talk!
__________________
"I wrote a song about dental floss but did anyone's teeth get cleaner?" -Frank Zappa
"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue, but moderation in principle is always a vice."- Thomas Paine
"I'll let you be in my dream if I can be in yours." -Bob Dylan
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 19:17
|
#12
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 18,269
|
Quote:
|
If he walks away after he made us, well we would still be here waiting for his return.
|
Interesting. So do we need God in our lives at all?
__________________
Scouse Git (2) LaFayette and Adam Smith you will be missed
"All my own perception of beauty both in majesty and simplicity is founded upon Our Lady." - JRR Tolkein
Get busy living or get busy dying.
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 20:01
|
#13
|
Prince
Local Time: 16:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Posts: 853
|
God, n, The justification for the penis
__________________
"I work in IT so I'd be buggered without a computer" - Words of wisdom from Provost Harrison
"You can be wrong AND jewish" - Wiglaf :love:
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 21:48
|
#14
|
King
Local Time: 09:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,413
|
I don't understand that whole "waiting for God's return" thing. I am a Christian, but that's a part that has escaped me. I mean, I personally feel God's presence, and believe I can talk to Him and sense Him in my surroundings. So why do I need to wait for His return? He's already here.
I think that's the first time I've posted this close to my personal relationship with God...I feel...strange...
__________________
"I predict your ignore will rival Ben's" - Ecofarm
^ The Poly equivalent of:
"I hope you can see this 'cause I'm [flipping you off] as hard as I can" - Ignignokt the Mooninite
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 22:03
|
#15
|
Deity
Local Time: 12:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
Our perceptions of God are always limited by our own understanding, thus while we can imagine an omnipotent being, our limitations prevent us from fully grasping such a concept.
That's the problem with trying to define omnipotence, because we simply do not have any reference points to compare, (in fact, such reference points would be impossible).
All we can say is that an essential quality of God must be omnipotence.
|
I call BS. Omnipotence is easily defined as the ability to define reality.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 22:05
|
#16
|
Deity
Local Time: 12:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by cinch
The way I look at it is this:
If there is a "being" outside of our existence, outside of our universe... it ain't bound by the laws of said universe. It is, by definition, everything one has ever seen and nothing one could ever imagine at the same time, because these concepts of 'everything' and 'nothing' are simply states of being, or conceiving, in our universe.
Good, evil, happy sad... none of that factors into it. Anything outside of our existence is unknowable. If you follow most religions to their "end", if you will, that's usually what the message is.
So why alter your life in an uncomfortable way to attempt to please a "being" that no one can even conceive of, or know? That's just silly talk!
|
Well, given the definition of universe (the set of all that exists), if God isn't within the universe, then God doesn't exist and wrt the "laws" of said universe, one of those "laws" would be that God was omnipotent.
Plus, I'm not assuming outside our universe. I'm really talking about the philosophical implications of omnipotence.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 22:09
|
#17
|
Deity
Local Time: 12:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
I think I need to clarify something: the first part of my proof (or random musing), which is the important part, is NOT TALKING ABOUT GOD. I am merely referring to an omnipotent being. It could be you, me, or for that matter Michael Jackson - so no religious dogma about "God" applies. Only in the second part do I apply these conclusions to the christian God.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 22:18
|
#18
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 18,269
|
Skywalker:
Quote:
|
do not have any reference points to compare,
|
Any way around this point?
__________________
Scouse Git (2) LaFayette and Adam Smith you will be missed
"All my own perception of beauty both in majesty and simplicity is founded upon Our Lady." - JRR Tolkein
Get busy living or get busy dying.
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 22:21
|
#19
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 18,269
|
Quote:
|
So why do I need to wait for His return? He's already here.
|
Now we are back to the Trinity again.
God, in the person of the Holy Spirit is here right now on Earth. God, in the person of Jesus Christ, is not. When Christ returns, we will be taken up to heaven to be with God the Father, not just in spirit, but in a very real physical sense.
We will no longer have our corruptible, sinful flesh after the resurrection.
__________________
Scouse Git (2) LaFayette and Adam Smith you will be missed
"All my own perception of beauty both in majesty and simplicity is founded upon Our Lady." - JRR Tolkein
Get busy living or get busy dying.
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2004, 22:23
|
#20
|
Deity
Local Time: 12:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
Skywalker:
Quote:
|
do not have any reference points to compare,
|
Any way around this point?
|
What do you mean by a "reference point"? Is there some way that my definition of omnipotence (defining reality) is insufficient? In fact, "all-powerful" pretty much covers it.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2004, 00:55
|
#21
|
Deity
Local Time: 00:42
Local Date: November 3, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
Posts: 14,606
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
All we can say is that an essential quality of God must be omnipotence.
|
Why? I cannot recall anywhere in the bible that hints about this.
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
Another quality of God is sufficiency, as he is totally self-sufficient.
|
Again, this is unsupported by the bible IIRC.
__________________
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2004, 01:35
|
#22
|
Princess
Local Time: 10:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: falling, once again
Posts: 8,823
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
Interesting. So do we need God in our lives at all?
|
Well the truth is that we might not need him in our lives at all, but it is better for the peace of mind to believe in him anyway, for this way we could be a little bit more sure about that unpredicatable fate.
Quote:
|
Well, given the definition of universe (the set of all that exists), if God isn't within the universe, then God doesn't exist and wrt the "laws" of said universe, one of those "laws" would be that God was omnipotent.
Plus, I'm not assuming outside our universe. I'm really talking about the philosophical implications of omnipotence.
|
You know the fact that we are not aware of something "exist" within the "universe" that are defined by our own awareness doesn't mean that something doesn't exist at all. We all know that there had been a time when people thought that the earth was the center of the "universe" and that they didn't know that Mars exist but we all know that Mars did exist at that time don't we.
Think about ants. They kind of live in a two dimentional world. They eat, sleep, work, fight, and play. There might be one ant that is very intelligent and he found out if he travels toward one direction he would eventually come back to his starting point. He even realized that their universe (the surface of earth) is without border but still limited. Another ants had attempted to climb up to a tree and looked at their world from an entirely different perspective.
However, there are things that they cannot understand. When a two year old accidently stepped on their nest they didn't know what had caused that disaster. When he saw the ants and picked up an ant and study it for a while, the ants didn't know how could one ant mysteriously disappear and reappear. They attibute all these to be miracles. Some ants had seen one of the child's foot, others had seen one of his fingers. They believed that they had seen god. They belived that he is omnipotent.
Later, the child grew up and lost his interest in ants. The ants were lost. They started to debate whether the god really exist and what would happen when he returns. But within their limited universe that is defined by their own awareness, how could even the smartest ant understand what is happening in the three-dimentional world?
Human beings are like ants that are living in a three-dimentional world. How could even the most intelligent of us understand what could be happening in a higher dimentional world? How could we ever find the conclusion about whether a god exist or not in an universe that is greater than our own awareness?
__________________
Be good, and if at first you don't succeed, perhaps failure will be back in fashion soon. -- teh Spamski
Grapefruit Garden
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2004, 01:41
|
#23
|
Deity
Local Time: 12:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
Quote:
|
You know the fact that we are not aware of something "exist" within the "universe" that are defined by our own awareness doesn't mean that something doesn't exist at all. We all know that there had been a time when people thought that the earth was the center of the "universe" and that they didn't know that Mars exist but we all know that Mars did exist at that time don't we.
Think about ants. They kind of live in a two dimentional world. They eat, sleep, work, fight, and play. There might be one ant that is very intelligent and he found out if he travels toward one direction he would eventually come back to his starting point. He even realized that their universe (the surface of earth) is without border but still limited. Another ants had attempted to climb up to a tree and looked at their world from an entirely different perspective.
However, there are things that they cannot understand. When a two year old accidently stepped on their nest they didn't know what had caused that disaster. When he saw the ants and picked up an ant and study it for a while, the ants didn't know how could one ant mysteriously disappear and reappear. They attibute all these to be miracles. Some ants had seen one of the child's foot, others had seen one of his fingers. They believed that they had seen god. They belived that he is omnipotent.
Later, the child grew up and lost his interest in ants. The ants were lost. They started to debate whether the god really exist and what would happen when he returns. But within their limited universe that is defined by their own awareness, how could even the smartest ant understand what is happening in the three-dimentional world?
Human beings are like ants that are living in a three-dimentional world. How could even the most intelligent of us understand what could be happening in a higher dimentional world? How could we ever find the conclusion about whether a god exist or not in an universe that is greater than our own awareness?
|
What's your point? I'm not talking about our understanding of the specifics of the universe, I'm talking about the general definition of the universe - the set of all that exists. Anything outside that set, by definition, does not exist. However, I never said god was outside that set (even though I believe him to be, that isn't the point of this thread). "Universe" here doesn't mean "contiguous region of spacetime".
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2004, 01:43
|
#24
|
Deity
Local Time: 12:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
(getting OT)
Quote:
|
Well the truth is that we might not need him in our lives at all, but it is better for the peace of mind to believe in him anyway, for this way we could be a little bit more sure about that unpredicatable fate.
|
However, the fact that it would be personally beneficial to believe in god (not that I agree with that, but I won't dispute it here) does not mean that belief in god is actually correct.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2004, 01:44
|
#25
|
Deity
Local Time: 00:42
Local Date: November 3, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
Posts: 14,606
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by HongHu
You know the fact that we are not aware of something "exist" within the "universe" that are defined by our own awareness doesn't mean that something doesn't exist at all.
|
Sure, though cinch started with the assumption that this god is outside of our universe...
Quote:
|
Originally posted by HongHu
We all know that there had been a time when people thought that the earth was the center of the "universe" and that they didn't know that Mars exist but we all know that Mars did exist at that time don't we.
|
Hm, even the ancient Greeks had their own heliocentric theory, which was also inaccurate, but was more accurate than Ptolemy's geocentric system. Ptolemy's system was propped up by the Church for obvious reasons.
__________________
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2004, 03:56
|
#26
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Illinois
Posts: 8,595
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Agathon
When I've had ten pints, I'm omniimpotent.
|
__________________
STFU and then GTFO!
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2004, 04:34
|
#27
|
King
Local Time: 11:42
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wichita
Posts: 1,352
|
When you realize the implications of omnipotence, you will find the answer to your own question, Sky.
__________________
http://monkspider.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2004, 05:03
|
#28
|
Deity
Local Time: 00:42
Local Date: November 3, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
Posts: 14,606
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by monkspider
When you realize the implications of omnipotence, you will find the answer to your own question, Sky.
|
Omnipotence is self-contradictory.
Simplest argument: can an omnipotent being make a rock so heavy that even it can't lift?
__________________
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2004, 06:16
|
#29
|
Emperor
Local Time: 02:42
Local Date: November 3, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,988
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by HongHu
Human beings are like ants that are living in a three-dimentional world. How could even the most intelligent of us understand what could be happening in a higher dimentional world? How could we ever find the conclusion about whether a god exist or not in an universe that is greater than our own awareness?
|
Then we evolve and extend our awareness.
Sometimes I wonder if we really understand, or if we only beleive we understand. Knowledge and Beliefs are, in working, almost the same (save for certainty).
Likewise, with perception, is there a way to know what crosses our mind's eye isn't a symptom of a mental disorder rather than reality?
How is it that we are certain of our emotions; chemically influenced as they are we may merely be being fed these emotions by implants.
And as for Logic? What causes us to be sure of causation, and implies that implications hold? A part of understanding as it is, Aristotle's Axioms are merely well-working beliefs.
Perhaps on a greater scale, How can we be sure of the sense of self, or the sense of existence? How can we know... at all?
The fact is, we can't. The Self, and indeed every concept we have, is a presumption and an approximation.
Thought in itself may be a fudge factor!
Now, to confuse it even more, attach an awareness to Reality (i.e. presume it is self-aware) and these confusions extend within it as well.
Now, with these flaws in knowledge, What if something were outside the confusions mentioned (i.e. it transcends awareness)?
For the life of me, I don't have a bloody clue what such a thing would be like!
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2004, 06:25
|
#30
|
Deity
Local Time: 00:42
Local Date: November 3, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
Posts: 14,606
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by HongHu
Human beings are like ants that are living in a three-dimentional world.
|
That remains to be seen...
Quote:
|
Originally posted by HongHu
How could even the most intelligent of us understand what could be happening in a higher dimentional world? How could we ever find the conclusion about whether a god exist or not in an universe that is greater than our own awareness?
|
There are several problems with your argument. First and foremost, you are making an a posteriori counter to an a priori argument. Secondly, your argument looks depressingly like the "God of the Gaps" argument, which is generally not taken seriously. Thirdly, you are making several assumptions for your argument, which you have not provided any separate arguments for.
__________________
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42.
|
|