Thread Tools
Old September 11, 2004, 11:09   #91
nbarclay
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering Storm
Emperor
 
nbarclay's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 6,676
I'd like to add Player1's suggested reduction in the cost of the Pentagon to the proposal Alexman described. If I understand how things work correctly, the improvement in army stats won't average being as big for the Increased Army Value flag as for adding a fourth unit. Between that and losing the extra hitpoints a fourth unit provides, the new Pentagon would be clearly weaker, so a reduction in its cost seems warranted.
nbarclay is offline  
Old September 11, 2004, 20:13   #92
alexman
PtWDG Gathering StormCivilization IV CreatorsInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityIron CiversCivilization IV: MultiplayerApolytoners Hall of FameCivilization IV PBEMApolyCon 06 Participants
Firaxis Games Software Engineer
 
alexman's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1998
Posts: 5,360
I would build the Pentagon with its current cost every time, just to give my Tank Armies +4 attack instead of +2, for example. Won't a cost reduction render the Wonder a no-brainer to build?

Of course, the Wonder is already a no-brainer in stock C3C, so maybe we want to keep it that way. So perhaps we can add the cost reduction as a second part of the proposal. What should be the cost reduction? Half price? 3/4?
alexman is offline  
Old September 11, 2004, 21:41   #93
nbarclay
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering Storm
Emperor
 
nbarclay's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 6,676
Building the Pentagon at some point is and will remain pretty much a no-brainer, but the question of when to build it can be a bit more interesting. For example, at a lower cost, the Pentagon would be more interesting to build for a civ that gets three or four armies from ancient and/or medieval leaders but does not have strong enough units to benefit from the Pentagon in all of those armies. At the other end of the spectrum, at a lower cost, a civ at peace couldn't benefit as much (and get as much advantage over the AIs) from leaving the Pentagon available as a prebuild instead of going ahead and building it.

I'm not really sure whether it would make more sense to take the Pentagon all the way down to 200 shields or just down to 300 (compared with its current cost of 400). My current inclination might be toward 200 as making the Pentagon more interesting if a player gets enough armies from early leaders to be able to build it.
nbarclay is offline  
Old September 12, 2004, 08:07   #94
jshelr
Civilization III PBEMIron CiversC3CDG Ankh-Morpork
Emperor
 
jshelr's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 4,132
I don't want to be a Luddite, but I just completed a game i've been puttering away on for awhile to get a military victory on demi. All that was required was to get to modern armor, fill your armies with those units, and use settlers to speed things up. You can clear a standard map of opponent cities without any losses, even against MI defense.

It's just too straightforward, and the AI just won't build modern era armies as a threat to the human player. It would be helpful if great military leaders could not arise after the middle ages and advanced military units could not be placed in armies.

Conversely, on demi and above, at least, cultural victory by an AI civ that wins early wars is a definite possibility. They build so cheaply that they end up building all the cultural buildings and, of course, they usually get all the early wonders. If it were hard to take them down, the game would have more interest in the late stages. But all you have to do, generally, is land some armies safely on a mountain near their capital and "you win."

Here's an off topic but related idea -- as soon as the UN is built, all civs at peace automatically enter a locked alliance. When the human attacks in the final push to win, the war is immediately against everyone.

must have got up on the wrong side of the bed...where's the coffee
__________________
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
jshelr is offline  
Old September 12, 2004, 21:02   #95
nbarclay
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering Storm
Emperor
 
nbarclay's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 6,676
I'm officially placing the following under consideration in conjunction with the proposal for 1-unit, +4hp armies:

If we make the proposed change for armies, what do we do with the cost of the Pentagon?

A) Leave it at 400.
B) Reduce it to 300.
C) Reduce it to 200.

Voting will be in order of preference (ABC) format.
nbarclay is offline  
Old September 12, 2004, 21:33   #96
Theseus
PtWDG Gathering StormApolyton UniversityApolytoners Hall of FameBtS Tri-LeagueC4DG Gathering StormApolyCon 06 Participants
Emperor
 
Theseus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The warmonger formerly known as rpodos. Gathering Storm!
Posts: 8,907
Hmmm... do we need to vote on the cost of Armies as well?

[Yes, methinks]
__________________
The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.

Duas uncias in puncta mortalis est.
Theseus is offline  
Old September 12, 2004, 22:25   #97
nbarclay
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering Storm
Emperor
 
nbarclay's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 6,676
The revamped military academy spits out an army every 25 turns instead of building them with shields, and we've reduced the shield cost of armies to 1 to prevent disbanding them for sheilds. So the change to the nature of armies should not require rethinking any cost issues.
nbarclay is offline  
Old September 13, 2004, 03:40   #98
donZappo
Warlord
 
donZappo's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 117
In order to make up for the large decrease in strength that is being proposed, why not gives armies a small amount of support abilities to make up for it? I don't see a problem with giving them "build roads" or "build fort" as an added bonus.

It seems as if the added attack bonus to one unit isn't too large to matter early in the game, but could make a significant difference during the later stages. This would allow armies to be useful early on where added roads or extra forts are most helpful and preserve its utility throughout all the ages.
donZappo is offline  
Old September 13, 2004, 03:48   #99
Modo44
Apolyton UniversityPtWDG2 Monty PythonCivilization III PBEMCivilization III Democracy GameDiploGamesACDG3 SpartansAlpha Centauri Democracy GameC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton Team
Emperor
 
Modo44's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: in western Poland
Posts: 6,038
The change is supposed to help the AI. It doesn't know how to use offensive units for building, so giving an army this ability would favor the human player.
__________________
Seriously. Kung freaking fu.
Modo44 is offline  
Old September 13, 2004, 11:01   #100
Theseus
PtWDG Gathering StormApolyton UniversityApolytoners Hall of FameBtS Tri-LeagueC4DG Gathering StormApolyCon 06 Participants
Emperor
 
Theseus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The warmonger formerly known as rpodos. Gathering Storm!
Posts: 8,907
Quote:
Originally posted by nbarclay
The revamped military academy spits out an army every 25 turns instead of building them with shields, and we've reduced the shield cost of armies to 1 to prevent disbanding them for sheilds. So the change to the nature of armies should not require rethinking any cost issues.
Errr, yes, I am officially an idiot.
__________________
The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.

Duas uncias in puncta mortalis est.
Theseus is offline  
Old September 17, 2004, 03:16   #101
nbarclay
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering Storm
Emperor
 
nbarclay's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 6,676
I hope we're getting very close to ready to lauch AU 504, so let's go ahead and get a vote started even though the Pentagon cost issue should technically wait a couple more days.

1) Yes/no: Should we adopt the following package of army changes?

Quote:
Army: Add 4 bonus HP

Army: Reduce transport capacity to 1

Pentagon: Replace 'Build Larger Armies' flag by 'Increased Army Value'

Reduce cities needed to support an army to 1
2) If the answer to (1) is yes, what should we do about the cost of the Pentagon? Please vote in order of preference among the three options (ABC format).

Quote:
A) Leave it at 400.
B) Reduce it to 300.
C) Reduce it to 200.
Please vote within 48 hours.
nbarclay is offline  
Old September 17, 2004, 03:17   #102
nbarclay
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering Storm
Emperor
 
nbarclay's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 6,676
My votes:

1) Yes
2) CBA
nbarclay is offline  
Old September 17, 2004, 08:55   #103
punkbass2000
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III Democracy GameApolyton UniversityCivilization III PBEM
King
 
punkbass2000's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waterloo, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,500
1) Yes
2) Either way is fine (I rarely get that far in my games, so I don't have much of an idea of what a 'fair' value would be)
__________________
"I used to be a Scotialist, and spent a brief period as a Royalist, but now I'm PC"
-me, discussing my banking history.
punkbass2000 is offline  
Old September 17, 2004, 09:01   #104
jshelr
Civilization III PBEMIron CiversC3CDG Ankh-Morpork
Emperor
 
jshelr's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 4,132
Yes,C
__________________
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
jshelr is offline  
Old September 17, 2004, 10:33   #105
alexman
PtWDG Gathering StormCivilization IV CreatorsInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityIron CiversCivilization IV: MultiplayerApolytoners Hall of FameCivilization IV PBEMApolyCon 06 Participants
Firaxis Games Software Engineer
 
alexman's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1998
Posts: 5,360
1) Yes
2) ABC

There are good arguments for and against a cheaper Pentagon, but when in doubt, keep it closer to stock.

A small Wonder like the Pentagon is different than a Great Wonder because you are under no time pressure to build it. You will eventually build it - the question is when. 400 shields in the Industrial Age is not a big deal, and 200 shields is the price of a city improvement (as cheap as a University).

I believe that there will be a more interesting strategic choice if the Pentagon remains relatively expensive, because you might decide to sacrifice an MGL to build it in the Ancient/Medieval Ages.
alexman is offline  
Old September 17, 2004, 10:37   #106
Theseus
PtWDG Gathering StormApolyton UniversityApolytoners Hall of FameBtS Tri-LeagueC4DG Gathering StormApolyCon 06 Participants
Emperor
 
Theseus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The warmonger formerly known as rpodos. Gathering Storm!
Posts: 8,907
1. Yes
2. BAC
__________________
The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.

Duas uncias in puncta mortalis est.
Theseus is offline  
Old September 17, 2004, 11:14   #107
sabrewolf
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMApolyton UniversityIron CiversCivilization IV CreatorsC3CDG Desolation RowCivilization IV PBEMCivilization IV: Multiplayer
Emperor
 
sabrewolf's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: turicum, helvetistan
Posts: 9,852
i thought only panelists vote? if no:
1) yes
2) a, b, c
same reasons as alex... 200 is just too cheap...
__________________
- Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity
- Atheism is a nonprophet organization.
sabrewolf is offline  
Old September 17, 2004, 11:15   #108
lockstep
Apolyton University
King
 
lockstep's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 1,529
1: YES
2: ABC
__________________
"As far as general advice on mod-making: Go slow as far as adding new things to the game until you have the basic game all smoothed out ... Make sure the things you change are really imbalances and not just something that doesn't fit with your particular style of play." - WesW
lockstep is offline  
Old September 17, 2004, 13:04   #109
nbarclay
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering Storm
Emperor
 
nbarclay's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 6,676
It's supposed to be just panelists voting.
nbarclay is offline  
Old September 17, 2004, 13:08   #110
punkbass2000
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III Democracy GameApolyton UniversityCivilization III PBEM
King
 
punkbass2000's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waterloo, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,500
Quote:
Originally posted by nbarclay
It's supposed to be just panelists voting.
Oh. Well no one had said that...
__________________
"I used to be a Scotialist, and spent a brief period as a Royalist, but now I'm PC"
-me, discussing my banking history.
punkbass2000 is offline  
Old September 17, 2004, 15:50   #111
jshelr
Civilization III PBEMIron CiversC3CDG Ankh-Morpork
Emperor
 
jshelr's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 4,132
sorry

you guys are normally so inclusive and consensus-building that i never ran into this before
__________________
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
jshelr is offline  
Old September 17, 2004, 21:25   #112
nbarclay
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering Storm
Emperor
 
nbarclay's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 6,676
I guess it's been so long since we've had many votes that it's not hard for people to forget how this is set up, or for new people to come along who never knew. The official process, as described in the Apolyton University Mod C3C Version thread, is:

Quote:
Method

Most modifications incorporated by the AU mod are a compromise between a) improving the AI, b) presenting the player with more options, and c) changing as little as possible. The level of this compromise is a delicate and subjective decision, so each proposed change is discussed by the Apolyton University community before it is implemented.

A new idea for the mod, or an area where the stock version needs improvement should first be posted in this thread [the Apolyton University Mod C3C Version thread] by any member of the community. A member of the AU mod panel (see next section) then starts a thread for discussion, where the community debates the merits of the new idea, the necessity for a change, its compliance with the philosophy of the mod, and its best final implementation. That thread is linked to this thread for easy future reference.

After listening to all sides of the debate, the AU mod panel then formulates a specific proposal, and the the issue is marked "under consideration" for a period of one week. During that period, the community is given the opportunity to present arguments for and against the proposed change.

After a week from the proposal being marked as "under consideration", the panel members get a time period (usually 24 hours) to cast their (Yes/No) votes. A minimum of 5 votes are needed within that time to make the decision official. If at the end of the time limit there is a tie, all remaining of the 7 panel members who did not vote, must then vote to resolve the tie.

The Panel

The AU mod is a community effort. However, a semi-official panel is set up to ensure this process runs smoothly.

The AU mod panel has these responsibilities:
  1. Listen to input from the Apolyton University community in order to identify possible changes to the standard game that fit into the AU mod philosophy, or problems with modifications already present in the AU mod. This includes reading this thread, as well as AARs and DARs for AU courses, as many scenarios are used as tests for the AU mod.
  2. Formulate official proposals for any change to the AU mod. In the case of new modifications, present a proposal to the community for discussion through a new thread, (which is to be linked from the mod’s description found in this thread). In the case of changes to the existing AU mod modifications, bump the relevant discussion thread by formulating the new proposal.
  3. Vote on the resolution of each official proposal. Modifications may be incorporated on a trial basis, in case real-game testing is required to further evaluate the change. Panelists cannot abstain.
  4. Implement any accepted proposal in the editor, create and upkeep the official documentation for the AU mod, and ensure that both the mod and the documentation are readily accessible the community.
nbarclay is offline  
Old September 18, 2004, 02:18   #113
Aqualung71
PtWDG Gathering StormCivilization III PBEMCivilization III Democracy GameInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityIron CiversC3CDG Desolation Row
Emperor
 
Aqualung71's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:16
Local Date: November 3, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 7,544
I hate the idea of reducing Army transport capacity to 1 (Theseus, where are you?)

But I guess I have to give it begrudging support since stock armies are way too overpowered in human hands.
__________________
So if you meet me have some courtesy, have some sympathy and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, or I'll lay your soul to waste

Re-Organisation of remaining C3C PBEMS
Aqualung71 is offline  
Old September 18, 2004, 04:14   #114
lockstep
Apolyton University
King
 
lockstep's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 1,529
It's not only that they are overpowered. The current AI handling of armies is simply a bug that Firaxis needs to deal with - thank god there's a (temporal?) solution available with the editor.
__________________
"As far as general advice on mod-making: Go slow as far as adding new things to the game until you have the basic game all smoothed out ... Make sure the things you change are really imbalances and not just something that doesn't fit with your particular style of play." - WesW
lockstep is offline  
Old September 18, 2004, 04:23   #115
Aqualung71
PtWDG Gathering StormCivilization III PBEMCivilization III Democracy GameInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityIron CiversC3CDG Desolation Row
Emperor
 
Aqualung71's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:16
Local Date: November 3, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 7,544
Precisely....which is why I said "in human hands"
__________________
So if you meet me have some courtesy, have some sympathy and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, or I'll lay your soul to waste

Re-Organisation of remaining C3C PBEMS
Aqualung71 is offline  
Old September 18, 2004, 07:29   #116
Stuie
King
 
Stuie's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Philly
Posts: 2,961
1: YES
2: BAC
__________________
"Stuie has the right idea" - Japher
"I trust Stuie and all involved." - SlowwHand
"Stuie is right...." - Guynemer
Stuie is offline  
Old September 18, 2004, 11:40   #117
Theseus
PtWDG Gathering StormApolyton UniversityApolytoners Hall of FameBtS Tri-LeagueC4DG Gathering StormApolyCon 06 Participants
Emperor
 
Theseus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The warmonger formerly known as rpodos. Gathering Storm!
Posts: 8,907
Quote:
Originally posted by Aqualung71
I hate the idea of reducing Army transport capacity to 1 (Theseus, where are you?)

But I guess I have to give it begrudging support since stock armies are way too overpowered in human hands.
I know, I know...

Worth it, though, I think.
__________________
The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.

Duas uncias in puncta mortalis est.
Theseus is offline  
Old September 20, 2004, 11:25   #118
ZargonX
PtWDG LegolandInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamACDG3 MorganC4DG SarantiumCiv4 SP Democracy GameApolyCon 06 ParticipantsBtS Tri-LeagueApolyton UniversityPtWDG2 TabemonoC4WDG Huygen's Union
Emperor
 
ZargonX's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Space
Posts: 5,117
Sorry for the late vote:

1)Yes
2)BAC
ZargonX is offline  
Old September 20, 2004, 13:24   #119
sabrewolf
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMApolyton UniversityIron CiversCivilization IV CreatorsC3CDG Desolation RowCivilization IV PBEMCivilization IV: Multiplayer
Emperor
 
sabrewolf's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: turicum, helvetistan
Posts: 9,852
so far it looks like B is the clear winner...
__________________
- Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity
- Atheism is a nonprophet organization.
sabrewolf is offline  
Old September 24, 2004, 17:11   #120
sabrewolf
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMApolyton UniversityIron CiversCivilization IV CreatorsC3CDG Desolation RowCivilization IV PBEMCivilization IV: Multiplayer
Emperor
 
sabrewolf's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:16
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: turicum, helvetistan
Posts: 9,852
1 week is up, so i guess the decision has fallen.

they have lost a whole lot of their punch now, but on the other hand we can now build 1 army per city.

...but....

in the early industrial era the military academy city will probably produce approx. 40-60 shields., which currently means an army every 7-10 turns. in between things like factories, power plants, hospitals and stock exchanges will wanted to be built.

so at this price armies will probably only be built when there is no infrastructure left to be made.


so before incorporating the changes in the AUmod: could we consider lowering the costs of armies from currently 400 to something around 200?
__________________
- Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity
- Atheism is a nonprophet organization.
sabrewolf is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:16.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team