Quote:
|
Originally posted by Locutus
The things you mention are the exact things that the rules call for now: no swearing, good faith, common sense, that sort of thing. But according to you, that was too subject to "multiple (good faith) interpretations". What you're saying now directly contradicts your earlier post...
|
The whole point in distinguishing good faith interpretations from bad faith ones is that people can have genuine disagreements about the meaning of a rule, or a work, etc. without being lawyerly about it. How is that contradictory?
__________________
- "A picture may be worth a thousand words, but it still ain't a part number." - Ron Reynolds
- I went to Zanarkand, and all I got was this lousy aeon!
- "... over 10 members raised complaints about you... and jerk was one of the nicer things they called you" - Ming
|