March 1, 2004, 01:17
|
#31
|
PolyCast Thread Necromancer
Local Time: 18:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: We are all Asher now.
Posts: 1,437
|
How did LotR ever become so popular?
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:18
|
#32
|
Emperor
Local Time: 14:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: New England
Posts: 3,572
|
And the academy continues its long tradition of celebrating mediocrity and bombast over humanity in films.
*yawn*
Terrible, terrible Oscar night. The only good thing was Tim Robbins getting it, and a couple other awards. Charlize Theron's speech was nice.
Also, the song performances were pretty cool too.
__________________
"mono has crazy flow and can rhyme words that shouldn't, like Eminem"
Drake Tungsten
"get contacts, get a haircut, get better clothes, and lose some weight"
Albert Speer
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:18
|
#33
|
Local Time: 13:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ACK!! PPHHHHTTBBBTTTT!!!
Posts: 7,022
|
The American Express movie with Tiger Woods play the role of Carl the groundskeeper from Caddyshack.
Best part of the whole show.
ACK!
__________________
"I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry, and that's extra scary to me. There's a large out of focus monster roaming the countryside. Look out, he's fuzzy, let's get out of here."
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:19
|
#34
|
King
Local Time: 11:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,413
|
Quote:
|
How did LotR ever become so popular?
|
Peter Jackson having buttsex with Harvey Weinstein...never fails
__________________
"I predict your ignore will rival Ben's" - Ecofarm
^ The Poly equivalent of:
"I hope you can see this 'cause I'm [flipping you off] as hard as I can" - Ignignokt the Mooninite
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:19
|
#35
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ??
Posts: 3,059
|
One movie to rule them all
__________________
"Many religions now come before us with ingratiating smirks and outspread hands, like an unctuous merchant in a bazaar. They offer consolation and solidarity and uplift, competing as they do in a marketplace. But we have a right to remember how barbarically they behaved when they were strong and were making an offer that people could not refuse." -Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:29
|
#36
|
King
Local Time: 20:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Yuggoth
Posts: 1,987
|
The best part was when the Winner of AFAIK best Cinematography said:
"We are thankful that Lord of the Rings isnīt nominated in this Category"
__________________
Applications programming is a race between software engineers, who strive to produce idiot-proof programs, and the Universe which strives to produce bigger idiots. - software engineers' saying
So far, the Universe is winning.
- applications programmers' saying
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:30
|
#37
|
King
Local Time: 18:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 1,528
|
It was a deserving picture, despite what any nay-sayer would have us believe. Truely an astonishing achievement by the entire production and ensemble.
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:30
|
#38
|
King
Local Time: 18:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 1,528
|
IIRC that was Best Foreign Language Film... for Barbarian Invasions.
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:31
|
#39
|
Local Time: 13:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ACK!! PPHHHHTTBBBTTTT!!!
Posts: 7,022
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Proteus_MST
The best part was when the Winner of AFAIK best Cinematography said:
"We are thankful that Lord of the Rings isnīt nominated in this Category"
|
It was "Best Foreign language film".
Which threw, because one was from Canada.
ACK!
__________________
"I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry, and that's extra scary to me. There's a large out of focus monster roaming the countryside. Look out, he's fuzzy, let's get out of here."
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:31
|
#40
|
PolyCast Thread Necromancer
Local Time: 18:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: We are all Asher now.
Posts: 1,437
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by MrBaggins
It was a deserving picture, despite what any nay-sayer would have us believe. Truely an astonishing achievement by the entire production and ensemble.
|
No, not really.
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:35
|
#41
|
King
Local Time: 20:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Yuggoth
Posts: 1,987
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by MrBaggins
IIRC that was Best Foreign Language Film... for Barbarian Invasions.
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Tuberski
It was "Best Foreign language film".
Which threw, because one was from Canada.
ACK!
|
Oh, sorry, you are right.
There were so few Categories where LotR didnīt win
__________________
Applications programming is a race between software engineers, who strive to produce idiot-proof programs, and the Universe which strives to produce bigger idiots. - software engineers' saying
So far, the Universe is winning.
- applications programmers' saying
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:36
|
#42
|
King
Local Time: 20:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Yuggoth
Posts: 1,987
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Comrade Tassadar
No, not really.
|
Maybe you donīt like Fantasy and
didnīt even read the whole Lord of the Rings-Trilogy
(and of course the Silmarillion) ?
__________________
Applications programming is a race between software engineers, who strive to produce idiot-proof programs, and the Universe which strives to produce bigger idiots. - software engineers' saying
So far, the Universe is winning.
- applications programmers' saying
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:39
|
#43
|
King
Local Time: 11:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,413
|
Actually, the LotR Trilogy was an amazing feat
However, RotK was NOT a good movie
__________________
"I predict your ignore will rival Ben's" - Ecofarm
^ The Poly equivalent of:
"I hope you can see this 'cause I'm [flipping you off] as hard as I can" - Ignignokt the Mooninite
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:40
|
#44
|
King
Local Time: 18:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 1,528
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Comrade Tassadar
No, not really.
|
Are you trying to say that this wasn't an astonishing achievement in film, or astonishing acting by the ensemble?
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:40
|
#45
|
PolyCast Thread Necromancer
Local Time: 18:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: We are all Asher now.
Posts: 1,437
|
I tried watching the first.
But I cringed.
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:42
|
#46
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,412
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by The Emperor Fabulous
Actually, the LotR Trilogy was an amazing feat
However, RotK was NOT a good movie
|
The Oscars tonight were given for the whole trilogy, not just RotK. Notice how it won nothing the last 2 years. The academy was essentially viewing them as a single feat.
And I say, kudos. I think it was the most deserving acheivement up there, warts and all. An astonishing acheivement, actually. And Jackson earned his Oscar.
__________________
Tutto nel mondo č burla
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:44
|
#47
|
King
Local Time: 11:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,413
|
__________________
"I predict your ignore will rival Ben's" - Ecofarm
^ The Poly equivalent of:
"I hope you can see this 'cause I'm [flipping you off] as hard as I can" - Ignignokt the Mooninite
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:46
|
#48
|
Emperor
Local Time: 14:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: New England
Posts: 3,572
|
The lord of the rings is an astonishing achievement. Too bad it isn't an astonishing film.
__________________
"mono has crazy flow and can rhyme words that shouldn't, like Eminem"
Drake Tungsten
"get contacts, get a haircut, get better clothes, and lose some weight"
Albert Speer
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:46
|
#49
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,412
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by The Emperor Fabulous
I guess I'm just bitter...Mystic River losing to RotK was like Boston vs. Yankees
|
Then it deserved to lose, so what's the problem?
__________________
Tutto nel mondo č burla
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:47
|
#50
|
King
Local Time: 20:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Yuggoth
Posts: 1,987
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Boris Godunov
The Oscars tonight were given for the whole trilogy, not just RotK. Notice how it won nothing the last 2 years. The academy was essentially viewing them as a single feat.
And I say, kudos. I think it was the most deserving acheivement up there, warts and all. An astonishing acheivement, actually. And Jackson earned his Oscar.
|
Yep, that was it.
Maybe that Rise of the King isnīt the best Film at all,
but the Trilogy as a whole has more than earned all the Oscars given tonight.
Especially if you take into account that the Books of Lord of the Ring were considered to be impossible to bring onto the Screen.
__________________
Applications programming is a race between software engineers, who strive to produce idiot-proof programs, and the Universe which strives to produce bigger idiots. - software engineers' saying
So far, the Universe is winning.
- applications programmers' saying
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:48
|
#51
|
King
Local Time: 11:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,413
|
DIE CLOWN!
__________________
"I predict your ignore will rival Ben's" - Ecofarm
^ The Poly equivalent of:
"I hope you can see this 'cause I'm [flipping you off] as hard as I can" - Ignignokt the Mooninite
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:50
|
#52
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,412
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by monolith94
The lord of the rings is an astonishing achievement. Too bad it isn't an astonishing film.
|
Sure it is. Far more astonishing than any of its competitors. Mystic River was good, but hardly ground-breaking. Great performances (I think Penn deserved the Oscar), but overall nothing new there. LotR is new--nothing on that scale has ever been done before.
What else was there? Master and Commander?! Puke. Lost in Translation? Dull.
I find this is like whining that Verdi's Otello is more of an acheivement than The Ring of the Neibelung. Sure, Otello may be better than Gotterdamerung, but it can't compete with the whole of Wagner's tetrology.
__________________
Tutto nel mondo č burla
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:54
|
#53
|
PolyCast Thread Necromancer
Local Time: 18:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: We are all Asher now.
Posts: 1,437
|
Just because it might be better than the other films doesn't mean its good.
Just look at Deus Ex 2. Better than any other game released last year (IIRC), but still really really bad.
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:54
|
#54
|
Emperor
Local Time: 14:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Directly from the FART international airport
Posts: 3,045
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Boris Godunov
LotR is new--nothing on that scale has ever been done before.
|
Yeah, never before a film was made with astonishing environments and huge budgets? The history of Hollywood is about ROTK being remade and remade every 5 years or so, with a new technological caveat thrown in. That is hardly an achievement.
__________________
"Now you're gonna ask me, is it an enforcer's job to drop the gloves against the other team's best player? Well sure no, but you've gotta know, these guys, they don't think like you and me." (Joël Bouchard, commenting on the Gaborik-Carcillo incident).
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:54
|
#55
|
King
Local Time: 18:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 1,528
|
/me coughs
Return of the King
will be a film that the Academy won't mind having recognized in many years time.
Cold "Cold Reception" Mountain, Mystic "Oscar Bait" River, Lost "Lost sense of storytelling" in Translation and "Disney"Biscuit just weren't worthy winners.
There is no doubt that RotK was worthy to win the technicals it did, and the big awards too. Best Actor or Actress would have been a stretch... but it wasn't nommed for those categories.
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 01:58
|
#56
|
King
Local Time: 18:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 1,528
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Oncle Boris
Yeah, never before a film was made with astonishing environments and huge budgets? The history of Hollywood is about ROTK being remade and remade every 5 years or so, with a new technological caveat thrown in. That is hardly an achievement.
|
No one has ever attempted the simultaneous production of three massive films together, before. Its firstly astonishing, period, and secondly astonishing that it maintained qualitive consistency.
There were a *lot* of trilogies, that had very poor second and third, or just third parts... Godfather III, SW VI... the list goes on and on.
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 02:01
|
#57
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,412
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Comrade Tassadar
Just because it might be better than the other films doesn't mean its good.
.
|
Um, but it does mean it should beat them out for Best Picture...
__________________
Tutto nel mondo č burla
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 02:04
|
#58
|
Emperor
Local Time: 14:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Directly from the FART international airport
Posts: 3,045
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by MrBaggins
No one has ever attempted the simultaneous production of three massive films together, before. Its firstly astonishing, and secondly astonishing that it maintained qualitive consistency.
|
What about Star Wars? BTW, the simultaneous production was merely a financial decision, they could have made each film with 6 years between each, and that wouldn't have changed much.
Quote:
|
There were a *lot* of trilogies, that had very poor second and third, or just third parts... Godfather III, SW VI... the list goes on and on.
|
And there are plenty of good TV series. Making 6 hours of worthy entairtenment is not harder than making 2 or 24. Especially when you're following a recipe.
What about those directors who consistently made quality films thourghout their entire career? Why don't they automatically get an Oscar?
__________________
"Now you're gonna ask me, is it an enforcer's job to drop the gloves against the other team's best player? Well sure no, but you've gotta know, these guys, they don't think like you and me." (Joël Bouchard, commenting on the Gaborik-Carcillo incident).
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 02:10
|
#59
|
Emperor
Local Time: 12:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: of the Big Apple
Posts: 4,109
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Oncle Boris
What about Star Wars? BTW, the simultaneous production was merely a financial decision, they could have made each film with 6 years between each, and that wouldn't have changed much.
|
False. Making all three movies at once is a huge departure from all previous attempts, and ficnancial horribly risky and nonsensical- once they committed to three films and beguin paying for it all, if the firt movie sank, there would have been huge pressure to tank the whole project and the producers would have lost the budget of three films in one failure.
Quote:
|
And there are plenty of good TV series. Making 6 hours of worthy entairtenment is not harder than making 2 or 24. Especially when you're following a recipe.
|
False also. Making one hour of entertainment is hard, and it gets harder the more time you add on, period. Think of it this way-this was a 7 year process: that should give you a sense of the scale.
Quote:
|
What about those directors who consistently made quality films thourghout their entire career? Why don't they automatically get an Oscar?
|
It's called the lifetime achievement Oscar. Blake won it this year.
__________________
If you don't like reality, change it! me
"Oh no! I am bested!" Drake :(
"it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
"Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2004, 02:11
|
#60
|
King
Local Time: 18:36
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 1,528
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Oncle Boris
What about Star Wars? BTW, the simultaneous production was merely a financial decision, they could have made each film with 6 years between each, and that wouldn't have changed much.
And there are plenty of good TV series. Making 6 hours of worthy entairtenment is not harder than making 2 or 24. Especially when you're following a recipe.
What about those directors who consistently made quality films thourghout their entire career? Why don't they automatically get an Oscar?
|
They sure could have... maybe... but they DIDN'T.
Star Wars ep 4 was an independent production from 5 and 6. They included a complete story arc in 4, because Lucas didn't know if they'd even make any other films.
Part of the point of the simultaneous production being such a massive feat is that you have to devote hundreds of millions to production, before seeing a dime from any theatre.
As for whether filming three films 6 years apart is the same... what are you smoking? Some actors would be 12 years older in the last episode... some might even die in the meantime.
And TV productions are small potatoes comparitively to film. The only things that approach are the HBO mini-series... like Angels in America, or Band of Brothers. Unsurprisingly, these have professional producers, like Speilberg running them.
Lastly.. lifetime achievement awards reward... lifetime achievement. Duh...
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:36.
|
|