March 6, 2004, 19:18
|
#61
|
King
Local Time: 11:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,413
|
Oncle Boris:
I hope you don't think Evan von Christoph is a "noob"
Him, Asher, and Orange all get my votes
__________________
"I predict your ignore will rival Ben's" - Ecofarm
^ The Poly equivalent of:
"I hope you can see this 'cause I'm [flipping you off] as hard as I can" - Ignignokt the Mooninite
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 19:20
|
#62
|
Deity
Local Time: 14:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Oncle Boris

Thus, debates that involve Imran?
|
More like debates that involve YOU. Imran is fine.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 19:21
|
#63
|
Deity
Local Time: 14:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Agathon
Who?
|
You mean "Whom?"
[/nazi]
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 19:23
|
#64
|
Deity
Local Time: 14:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
MtG
Imran
CBH
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 19:25
|
#65
|
Emperor
Local Time: 14:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Directly from the FART international airport
Posts: 3,045
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by skywalker

More like debates that involve YOU. Imran is fine.
|
Imran is a fine dialectician, but he's weak in conceptual debates. Plus he never admits defeat. Now, to YOU.
You are quite smart for your age, but you have much to learn. Must I remember you that you put me in the looney bin for introducing you to 'philosophy of language', an obligatory topic to anyone who has to study philosophy?
And you still have to get a clue about free will.
__________________
"Now you're gonna ask me, is it an enforcer's job to drop the gloves against the other team's best player? Well sure no, but you've gotta know, these guys, they don't think like you and me." (Joël Bouchard, commenting on the Gaborik-Carcillo incident).
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 19:27
|
#66
|
Emperor
Local Time: 14:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Directly from the FART international airport
Posts: 3,045
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by The Emperor Fabulous
Oncle Boris:
I hope you don't think Evan von Christoph is a "noob"
Him, Asher, and Orange all get my votes
|
 for Asher
And I'll add this Evan, who has not posted anything in the last three months. Alas, it seems like I'm the noob here.
__________________
"Now you're gonna ask me, is it an enforcer's job to drop the gloves against the other team's best player? Well sure no, but you've gotta know, these guys, they don't think like you and me." (Joël Bouchard, commenting on the Gaborik-Carcillo incident).
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 19:30
|
#67
|
Emperor
Local Time: 03:49
Local Date: November 3, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wal supports the CPA
Posts: 3,948
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by skywalker
You mean "Whom?"
[/nazi]
|
No, since the implicit question is "Who is is that?".
"Whom" is used for the direct and/or indirect objects of a sentence IIRC.
/counter nazi.
__________________
Only feebs vote.
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 19:41
|
#68
|
Emperor
Local Time: 13:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: topeka, kansas,USA
Posts: 8,164
|
1) Wraith
2) Ramo
3) Ben Kenobi
3) Mindseye
4) Dinodoc
5) Giant Squid
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 20:07
|
#69
|
Deity
Local Time: 14:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Agathon
No, since the implicit question is "Who is is that?".
"Whom" is used for the direct and/or indirect objects of a sentence IIRC.
/counter nazi.
|
"Who is is that" ??? (I'll assume you simply typed "is" twice)
Well, that's the inversion of "That is who", where "who" is being used (incorrectly) as an object pronoun. It should be "That is whom"
/countercounter nazi
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 20:09
|
#70
|
Deity
Local Time: 20:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Republic of Flanders
Posts: 10,747
|
Whom cares....
__________________
#There’s a city in my mind
Come along and take that ride
And it’s all right, baby, it’s all right #
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 20:16
|
#71
|
Deity
Local Time: 19:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seouenaca, Cantium
Posts: 12,426
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by skywalker
"Who is is that" ??? (I'll assume you simply typed "is" twice)
Well, that's the inversion of "That is who", where "who" is being used (incorrectly) as an object pronoun. It should be "That is whom"
/countercounter nazi
|
You use "who" as the subjective form (e.g "he"/"she"/ "they"), and "whom" as a direct or indirect object (e.g "him"/ "her"/"them"):
As the grammatically correct question is "who are they?" or "Who is he?" not "Whom are them" or "Whom is he?"Agathon is correct, in his usage of "who" at least..
Edit - almost irrelevant typo.
__________________
"Everybody knows you never go full retard. You went full retard man. Never go full retard"
Last edited by Dauphin; March 6, 2004 at 20:22.
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 20:20
|
#72
|
Local Time: 20:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: jihadding against Danish Feta
Posts: 6,182
|
GePap
Plato
Azazel
__________________
"I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 20:21
|
#73
|
Emperor
Local Time: 03:49
Local Date: November 3, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wal supports the CPA
Posts: 3,948
|
Yes, the shame of the double "is" somewhat undermines my credibility.
__________________
Only feebs vote.
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 20:21
|
#74
|
King
Local Time: 11:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,413
|
IIRC, Evan is now Thorn
Right?
Oh, and the three that Mono said are all from years ago
__________________
"I predict your ignore will rival Ben's" - Ecofarm
^ The Poly equivalent of:
"I hope you can see this 'cause I'm [flipping you off] as hard as I can" - Ignignokt the Mooninite
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 20:28
|
#75
|
Local Time: 18:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Oxford or Northampton, England
Posts: 8,116
|
This is hard to do. There are many good debators. It's more a style thing. For example, Skywalker I respect greatly, and while I disagree with his opinions on most things, he strikes me as intelligent. Yet his debating style, involving capitals a lot, seems to be patronising, especially when it's not needed. Fez must be there as a joke. Ben Kenobi, while he has shown he can debate well, and is indeed the only hardline Catholic I've seen that can discuss their policies well, I'm not sure he'd be in my top 3. Oncle and Whaleboy use way to many -isms and generally take debates into a realm that isn't necessarily as grounded in reality as I'd like, so while I agree with some of their opinions, I wouldn't put them in my top 3. Imran would be true, but I haven't seen that much of his actual debating, and more of him having fun, it seemed to me.
Two I'm pretty sure about. Spiffor and Jaguar Warrior. Spiffor will almost certainly win this, and deservedly so. He knows his stuff, he can draw on both sides of the argument, but has his own firm (and occasionally slightly extreme) beliefs. But his contraversial posts on things like underage sexual abuse (a while ago) and the French anti-religion, which not only I agree with, but also are well argued and respecting of others. That's one of the main difference, apart from obviously opinions, I've seen in style between him and Ben Kenobi. He's also a thoroughly nice guy, which always helps in debating. JW has a lot more maturity than his age would suggest, and while I disagree with him on many issues, he seems to be able to debate them eloquently and respectfully, and even to reach a consensus in the middle at times. A lot of kudos for both IMHO
The last I'm really not sure about. Slowwhand, while I disagree with him on a lot, we manage to discuss and agree on much, even some things about Iraq, like the motivations of various people, that I respect him for, while disagreeing with him greatly. Ramo also seems intelligent and argues well about things. However I'm not sure I'd put either of those in the top 3. The last one I can't decide on yet. So I'll leave it at two for the moment.
__________________
Smile
For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
But he would think of something
"Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 20:45
|
#76
|
Emperor
Local Time: 18:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Posts: 4,620
|
1)Wraith
2)Berzerker
3)MtG
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 20:49
|
#77
|
Deity
Local Time: 14:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Big Crunch
You use "who" as the subjective form (e.g "he"/"she"/ "they"), and "whom" as a direct or indirect object (e.g "him"/ "her"/"them"):
As the grammatically correct question is "who are they?" or "Who is he?" not "Whom are them" or "Whom is he?"Agathon is correct, in his usage of "who" at least..
Edit - almost irrelevant typo.
|
Not "Whom are them" but "Whom are they". "Whom are they" is the inverted form of "They are whom". It would be incorrect to say "They are who".
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 20:53
|
#78
|
Emperor
Local Time: 03:49
Local Date: November 3, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wal supports the CPA
Posts: 3,948
|
No skywalker. Word order is grammatically significant in English.
Quote:
|
The distinction between "who" and "whom" is basically simple: "who" is the subject form of this pronoun and "whom" is the object form. "Who was wearing that awful dress at the Academy Awards banquet?" is correct because "who" is the subject of the sentence. "The MC was so startled by the neckline that he forgot to whom he was supposed to give the Oscar" is correct because "whom" is the object of the preposition "to." So far so good.
|
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~brians/errors/who.html
If you are right, what is the subject of "Whom is wearing the red dress?" or "Whom are they?"
__________________
Only feebs vote.
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 20:53
|
#79
|
Retired
Local Time: 13:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Mingapulco - CST
Posts: 30,317
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Oncle Boris
And I'll add this Evan, who has not posted anything in the last three months. Alas, it seems like I'm the noob here.
|
Yep... EVC still posts under the Thorn handle (when he's not restricted)... he was posting just last week
__________________
Keep on Civin'
Civ V Civilization V Civ5 CivV Civilization 5 Civ 5 - Do your part!
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 20:56
|
#80
|
Deity
Local Time: 14:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Agathon
No skywalker. Word order is grammatically significant in English.
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~brians/errors/who.html
If you are right, what is the subject of "Whom is wearing the red dress?" or "Whom are they?"
|
I'd think it would be "they", because as I mentioned in the last two posts it's simply "they are whom" inverted ("inversion" is actually a grammatical term, at least according to my French teacher). In "who are they" you'd have two subject pronouns on opposite sides of the verb.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 21:06
|
#81
|
Emperor
Local Time: 03:49
Local Date: November 3, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wal supports the CPA
Posts: 3,948
|
If they is the subject and whom is the object, then each word must refer to different things. No item can be both the subject and the object unless you use a reflexive pronoun (himself, herself, itself, themselves). e.g. "He washed himself".
"They" is a demonstrative pronoun (that, those, them) and "whom" is an interrogative pronoun (who, whom, which).
So you can't be right.
__________________
Only feebs vote.
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 21:06
|
#82
|
Deity
Local Time: 19:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seouenaca, Cantium
Posts: 12,426
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by skywalker
It would be incorrect to say "They are who".
|
Whom is never used with the verb 'to be' because the verb to be cannot take an object
__________________
"Everybody knows you never go full retard. You went full retard man. Never go full retard"
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 21:07
|
#83
|
OTF Moderator
Local Time: 12:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 13,063
|
I must say that some seem very ethuisiastic for debating
JM
__________________
Jon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 21:13
|
#84
|
Emperor
Local Time: 14:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,605
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Jon Miller
I must say that some seem very ethuisiastic for debating
|
I disagree!
__________________
"For just twenty cents a day, we'll moisten your dreams with man urine." -Space Ghost
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 21:18
|
#85
|
Deity
Local Time: 13:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Underwater no one can hear sharks scream
Posts: 11,096
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by loinburger
I disagree!
|
I refute you thus:  !
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 21:20
|
#86
|
Deity
Local Time: 14:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Big Crunch
Whom is never used with the verb 'to be' because the verb to be cannot take an object
|
Huh? In the sentence "I am a furry", "furry" is the object, isn't it?
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 21:21
|
#87
|
Emperor
Local Time: 03:49
Local Date: November 3, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wal supports the CPA
Posts: 3,948
|
No. It is a predicate adjective.
__________________
Only feebs vote.
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 21:21
|
#88
|
Emperor
Local Time: 20:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 6,291
|
- This isn't an argument, this is just contradiction.
- No it isn't.
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 21:24
|
#89
|
Deity
Local Time: 14:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Agathon
No. It is a predicate adjective.
|
Not "I am furry", "I am a furry". "Furry" as in "stefu"
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2004, 21:25
|
#90
|
Emperor
Local Time: 14:49
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,605
|
__________________
"For just twenty cents a day, we'll moisten your dreams with man urine." -Space Ghost
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:49.
|
|