Thread Tools
Old January 12, 1999, 16:32   #1
polymths
Warlord
 
Local Time: 23:03
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Posts: 101
Strategy Games Paradigms
There might be others, but as far as Civ-like games are concerned, there are basically two paradigms of game design. These are:

I) Conquest - The object of the game is to eliminate all other opponents and all your efforts are made to do just that. The best example of this is a game called "Command HQ".

II) Development - The object of the game is to expand and develop your "empire". A very good example is the game "Railroad Tycoon". Games such as SimCity and Caesar are examples of pure development as there does not exist opponents equivalent to oneself. Although very similar to Civ, "Colonization" is actually a development game, based on the way you play it.

There have been many Civ-like games. However, aside from "Colonization", all others are fundamentally variations on "Command HQ". Development aspects, if any, are not sophisticated or interesting enough to make that aspect alone worthwhile. Compare this with "Railroad Tycoon" or "Simcity" or "Caesar" where the fun and fundamental point of the game is development itself, and not development for the sake of building a war machine.

I strongly believe that future designers of Civ-like games should enhance and make more sophisticated the "development" aspect of the game so that the "war" aspect is not dominant. To do so would require sophisticated economic and diplomatic features and models but would certainly make it different than all the other Civ-like games that have come out, which fundamentally are nothing more than glorified versions of "Command HQ".

polymths is offline  
Old January 12, 1999, 18:18   #2
Chuckles
King
 
Chuckles's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:03
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: of WOOT I'm a King now!
Posts: 1,022
Paradigms? Are you sure you're an engineer?
Chuckles is offline  
Old January 15, 1999, 19:26   #3
St Leo
Scenario League / Civ2-CreationApolytoners Hall of Fame
 
St Leo's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:03
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In search of pants
Posts: 5,085
Maybe it's a PR person in disguise...
:-)
St Leo is offline  
Old January 15, 1999, 20:50   #4
Chuckles
King
 
Chuckles's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:03
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: of WOOT I'm a King now!
Posts: 1,022
Definitely sounds like marketing, or PHB.

All joking aside, I do agree with your statements. And the market has proved time and time again that it's easier to do the conquer than the build. And I guess some of the escuse has been proccesing power, but I think some of it is development power too.

There are sometimes I feel a little uneasy about some TBS games because the only point seems to be who can produce the most units to kill others with, which is just like RTS games.
Chuckles is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team