April 7, 1999, 11:30
|
#1
|
Settler
Local Time: 07:05
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: NJ
Posts: 14
|
SMACTP
I liked both games, but I think neither of them were perfect. But 1 game's shortfalls are sometimes nicely corrected by the other, so maybe the best thing to do is merge them both.
So what we need to do here is decide which is best from each game to create the perfect CIV game.
From CTP:
Graphics
Plot (I prefer the history to scifi)
Unconventional units
Stacking
Public Works (Can't stand formers!)
From SMAC:
Unit Movement
Wonder Movies
City Screen
Unit combat (esp. hit points)
Diplomacy options
Borders
Manual
That's off the top of my head, so what does anyone else want to add?
|
|
|
|
April 7, 1999, 18:05
|
#2
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 07:05
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: sandiego, ca, us
Posts: 97
|
I say bring back the 7 wonder format from the original civ's. Should be easy since you can have 64 I think. Since I like many of the new wonders they added maybe they organize it something like the 7 monumental(structural) wonders of a time period and also the 7 cultural wonders of a time period. That would give us 14 wonders per time period.
Bring back the antechamber (I posted stuff on this before somewhere)
Plus Don't forget the trade from CTP. Opps looks like my makefile just finished. Need to go back to work. I'll post more if/when I have the time.
|
|
|
|
April 8, 1999, 00:04
|
#3
|
Warlord
Local Time: 07:05
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 195
|
CTP's 2D world is better than SMAC's 3D world (I think).
Also if someone could figure out how to make a round world that would kick ass.
|
|
|
|
April 10, 1999, 00:03
|
#4
|
Emperor
Local Time: 04:05
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Brasil
Posts: 3,958
|
Don't forget about the trade system in CTP, which is great. But I have to say I prefer SMAC's 3D world. CTP's combat screen is fun to see. That's what I can think of now.
Alexnm
|
|
|
|
April 10, 1999, 19:32
|
#5
|
Warlord
Local Time: 07:05
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 144
|
No, no more city screen for me. I like the 2D graphic of CTP than 3D of SMAC
|
|
|
|
April 12, 1999, 11:58
|
#6
|
Prince
Local Time: 09:05
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Espoo, Finland
Posts: 672
|
After playing SMAC I played CivII and the 2D-grafs, left me cold. I have seen many pictures of CTP and AFAIK the grafs in CTP are similiar (but, better compared to CivII).
So I have to vote for SMAC. I like the 3D-style. It brings so much more feeling.
If this mix-game were to have an energy production, like in SMAC, then 2D wouldn't work at all.
|
|
|
|
April 12, 1999, 14:14
|
#7
|
Prince
Local Time: 07:05
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: home
Posts: 601
|
Would definately have to include a governments option similar to SMACs. I like CTP's expanded government types from CivII, and I also like CTP's rations/wages/workday sliders, but the Social Engineering in SMAC is a better overall idea - something similar to that would be nice.
In fact, you could have a few more categories, instead of the 4x4 choices. Economics is an obvious category, but also Government type, Individual Liberty settings, and maybe others?
wheathin
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05.
|
|