February 12, 2000, 01:57
|
#1
|
King
Local Time: 02:08
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Charlottesville VA
Posts: 1,184
|
Strategic Board Games
Anyone here ever enojoy any of these games:
Twilight Imperium (awesome MOO type game)
Age of Renniasance (great Euro trade game)
Machiavelli (Italian diplomatic game)
Cosmic Encounters (Quirky SF game)
Or any other such games?
|
|
|
|
February 12, 2000, 04:10
|
#2
|
Emperor
Local Time: 02:08
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 6,639
|
Hmmm... I have the feeling you accidentally posted this in the wrong section
|
|
|
|
February 12, 2000, 15:28
|
#3
|
King
Local Time: 02:08
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Charlottesville VA
Posts: 1,184
|
yeah, thnx.
|
|
|
|
February 12, 2000, 21:01
|
#4
|
Guest
|
Welcome.
One with the discussion...
----------------
Dan; Apolyton CS
|
|
|
|
February 16, 2000, 11:55
|
#5
|
King
Local Time: 00:08
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Posts: 1,417
|
I believe that I have played Cosmic Encounters, but it was only a couple of times, and a very long time ago. Here are some multi-player board games that I have played and enjoyed:
Kingmaker - War of the Roses in England. Very fun game which moved quickly, and had excellent graphics for the time. (Mid 1970s)
Samurai - Kingmaker in Japan, a less interesting game which had very mediocre graphics for the time. (Mid 1980s)
Third Reich - Excellent multiplayer game of WWII. Played a lot of this while in the army and never tired of it.
Titan - another good game, though it could bog down sometimes into a massive war of attrition. 'Strategic' as well as tactical play kept it tense.
Diplomacy - A classic strategy game, which always seemed to bog down in midgame, but was fascinating in the early game.
Blackbeard - A very fun game, but as luck played a fairly large role, one which you could not enjoy if you must win every time. (I learned to do this, but it took awhile)
|
|
|
|
February 26, 2000, 21:59
|
#6
|
Prince
Local Time: 07:08
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: so cal, u.s.a.
Posts: 552
|
SUPREMECY
a major board game...
it was THE best until puters came along, and CIV replaced it...
the3.14rt
------------------
how can you be in two places at once
when you're not anywhere at all?
---------------------------------
We now return you to our regular programming...
a thrilling tale from yesteryear...
which is already in progress!!!
|
|
|
|
February 29, 2000, 01:54
|
#7
|
King
Local Time: 07:08
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: of the Great White North
Posts: 1,790
|
Anyone out there play any games from Strategy and Tactics?
"Legion" and "Viking" were very good historical simulations of ancient warfare - hex maps, die-cut counters...
"Sniper" was an excellent sim of individual soldiers, with simultaneous scripted moves, and featuring morale, panic, and a wide variety of weapons and tactics.
These were (gasp) mid '70s. (Showing my age!)
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2000, 01:10
|
#8
|
Deity
Local Time: 00:08
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Bohol
Posts: 13,381
|
I played and enjoyed all those games mentioned by Sikander, with the exception of Blackbeard, which I never played, and Third Reich, which I played by thought some of the rules to be artifically restrictive (e.g. you can't attack such-and-such country until such-and-such a date.)
I never understood the point of Supremacy. It seemed whoever went first, won.
I also enjoyed many S&T games. My two favorites were a solitaire Roman Empire game, where you're fighting off hoards of invading barbarians and rebelling Legions, and a solitare WWII convoy game, where you had to get your ships safely across the Atlantic. As I remember it, S&T was a magazine which contained a new game every month. They were eventually bought out by--I believe--GDW and put out of business.
And if you want to show ages, although I did not buy "Chancellorsville" by Avalon Hill (which I believe was the first stategy board game to use hexes), I did buy the next one: "Gettyburg." I also owned Avalon Hill's "Tactics II," which was the first game to use the now standard "attack factor - movement factor."
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2000, 22:06
|
#9
|
Warlord
Local Time: 07:08
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 141
|
Somehow I was reminded of the original Civilization/Advanced Civilization boardgames by AH.
Simpler, subtler and more funny than the computer game, but it was hard to find enough guys sitting around for 8-10 hours for the boardgame.
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2000, 22:17
|
#10
|
Deity
Local Time: 00:08
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Bohol
Posts: 13,381
|
Right-- There's only one place to find people smart enough to play strategic board games but dumb enough to waste that much time: college.
|
|
|
|
March 2, 2000, 00:41
|
#11
|
Emperor
Local Time: 02:08
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,127
|
Isn't Diplomacy a strategic board game? If you think so, come over to the Stories and Diplomacy forum!
|
|
|
|
March 2, 2000, 09:26
|
#12
|
King
Local Time: 02:08
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Delaware
Posts: 2,459
|
Oooh how about Axis and Allies, Rail Baron, Risk, and stuff like that?
|
|
|
|
March 9, 2000, 02:02
|
#13
|
Guest
|
Ooh, yeah, Kingmaker! A definite favorite. I liked the AH Panzer games too. I played Squad Leader once… have never since found anyone willing to spend a month learning the rules. Not even when I was in college.
S&T: I liked the Panzer '44 / Mechwar '77 series, and I've made comments before about Globar War, a wonderfully elegant game.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08.
|
|