January 25, 2001, 12:45
|
#31
|
King
Local Time: 09:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 2,151
|
Well, I guess that is a solution.
Just a couple of world settings left before we are ready to go, then: pods and random events.
My votes:
Pods on
Random events off
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2001, 14:04
|
#32
|
Prince
Local Time: 02:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 493
|
I vote:
pods on
random events on
(Random events are, to recap:
Asteroid strikes base (base destroyed
Biology lab event (blight if no lab, +1 nut for ten years if one)
Bumper crop (+1 nut for 10 years)
Childrens Creche event (if noe, extra drone for 5 years, if one, pop surge for as long as sustainable)
Energy Bank event (if none, all nearby mines destroyed, if one, +50 credits)
Market crash/boom (reduction of 75%, or if 4th place or lower, doubling if <500)
Resource lifecycle (a reseource will peter out)
Famine (-1 nut for 10 years)
Hail storm (all solar collectors near base are wiped out)
Haze (-1 energy for 10 years)
Heat wave (+1 energy for 10 years)
Industrial boom (+1 min for 10 years)
Industrial collapse (-1 min for 10 years)
Network Node event (if none, then all current research credits wiped out; if one, free tech granted
New resource (a new resoiurce pops up)
Prometheus Virus (if base has a research or nanohospital, no effect -or if faction ahs one of the "medical" SP's - otherwise base pop reduces by 1/2, and any base within a radius of affected base former pop also reduced by 1/2 - unless it too has a research or nano hospital)
Sea Beetles (wipe out kelp farms at base
Sunspots (communications disrupted for 10 - 20 turns)
Tidal wave (mining platforms destroyed
Volcano (destroys all enhancements and reduces populations of bases within radius set by formula) - only happens if faction is in first or second place.
Asteroid strike on Nessus Prime (20% chance if selected - all nessus mining stations destroyed)
Solar flare (20% chance if selected -all orbital power trans,mitters and defense satellites destroyed - all bases produce triple energy next turn)
Frequency:
Each turn the game randomly picks a base . If less than 100, it picks a number between 1 - 100. If no base corresponds to that number (Bases are numbered according to founding) there is no event.
If the base picked is less than size 4, or is the only base of the faction, or is already under the effects of a longer term random event, then there is none for that turn. If the event would have no effect (eg asteroid strike on nessus) and there are no mining stations there, then there is no event.
All events are equally likely, but the game has a high probability of ignoring events that are beneficial to factions that are above average (e.g. 1, 2 and 3 in a seven faction game) and ignoring events that would penalize a below average faction
As a faction that seems doomed to do poorly, I obviously vote for this great game leveller.
Rynn
[This message has been edited by Rynn: (edited January 25, 2001).]
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2001, 14:10
|
#33
|
King
Local Time: 02:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Leamington, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,167
|
Pods on, Random events on, just to help poor Rynn.
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2001, 14:13
|
#34
|
Prince
Local Time: 02:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 493
|
(of course if I were playing as the Pirates, I'd vote pods on and random events off)
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2001, 01:36
|
#35
|
Emperor
Local Time: 00:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 9,541
|
Voting to date:
Pods scattered:
on ...... 4
off ...... 0
Random Events:
on ...... 2
off ...... 2
Still need Solver, mark13 and Misotu to cast their votes.
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2001, 01:42
|
#36
|
Deity
Local Time: 10:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 18,355
|
Well, but exactly, why do you zip the PBEM turns? In CtP, we never do, as Zip, at best, decreases size by 10 KB, so it's not just worth the effor in CtP.
And now, also, I think that we have all the questions cleared, and can start the game with our CMN in place.
------------------
Solver - http://www.aok.20m.com
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2001, 01:55
|
#37
|
ACS Staff Member / Hosted Site Admin
Local Time: 10:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 7,524
|
Pod's on
Random events off
SMAC turn size is about 3-4 times bigger than CTP.
About 500KB, less or more.
Zipped= 40-50KB.
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2001, 06:27
|
#38
|
ACS Staff Member / Hosted Site Admin
Local Time: 10:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 7,524
|
It looks like a Council's session  .
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2001, 07:08
|
#39
|
King
Local Time: 09:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 2,151
|
It certainly does. Hmmm.. should have withheld my vote and hoped for a bribe.
Anyway:
Pod Scattering: Measure passes (I do not think we have anyone with Executive Veto  )
Random events (default is yes, so we must be voting over a removal): Currently, measure fails. More votes could change matters, though.
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2001, 12:17
|
#40
|
Deity
Local Time: 10:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 18,355
|
I vote for pods on, events off. I hate sunspot activity, as for me diplomacy is very important, and 20 turn w/o it are boring.
------------------
Solver - http://www.aok.20m.com
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2001, 12:25
|
#41
|
King
Local Time: 07:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Northampton, England
Posts: 2,128
|
Pods on, randoms off. If this is to be a rated game, we should not have to be at the mercy of an asteroid, or the increasingly annoying sunspot activity.
Just Mis to go....
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2001, 14:06
|
#42
|
King
Local Time: 09:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 2,151
|
Final votes:
Pod scattering:
For: 7
Against: 0
Random events:
For: 2
Against: 5
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2001, 20:47
|
#43
|
King
Local Time: 02:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Leamington, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,167
|
Hey! I've joined the royalty.
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2001, 20:51
|
#44
|
Emperor
Local Time: 08:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Leamington Spa, England
Posts: 3,657
|
Thank goodness. You know how I hated hanging out with warlords ...
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2001, 21:05
|
#45
|
King
Local Time: 07:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Northampton, England
Posts: 2,128
|
Still waiting to be a king, after 4 months of posting....hmmm....
|
|
|
|
January 27, 2001, 00:34
|
#46
|
Prince
Local Time: 02:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 493
|
One last attempt to reverse the vote:
If the main concern is the sunspot activity, with seven human players it is irrelevant, as the diplomacy screens always come up for humans - it's the AI you can't contact during sunspots.
We hold to the convention that we don't contact during such activity, but the game (and e-mails) let us.
So, I appeal to the "council" for a vote reversal on that great game leveler
Al (Rynn) Gore
|
|
|
|
January 27, 2001, 01:04
|
#47
|
Emperor
Local Time: 08:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Leamington Spa, England
Posts: 3,657
|
Sorry to be last  Pods on, random OFF.
|
|
|
|
January 27, 2001, 12:43
|
#48
|
ACS Staff Member / Hosted Site Admin
Local Time: 10:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 7,524
|
I once again vote against the random events  .
I would really hate the fact that in a critical point of the game a disastrous random event would occur and stand as a factor of maybe losing the game while another random event on a same point benefit some other faction and lead them to win.
Even the same catastrophic event could come in a non critical point to a opponent faction and do no major harm to them.
BTW do we have a CMN???
|
|
|
|
January 27, 2001, 14:36
|
#49
|
King
Local Time: 09:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 2,151
|
The sunspots thing is no big deal to me, in fact I rather like it - it gives some extra options (such as repercussion-free atrocities :evil grin: ) I have much more of a problem with PlanetBlight and Crop Failure, both of which can send a base back to the Stone Age. (Especially Growth-hampered factions like the Hive and Morgan can have problems replacing the lost population.) Industrial Bust can also be rather annoying.
I am just not very fond of them... but it is no big deal to me, and I could certainly live with them on. Prefer off, though.
On the CMN isue, I have talked to D-Dad, and he is willing in principle, but apparently uses lots of different computers and has only 1 SMACX disc, which makes setting up such a game a slight logistical problem. He said he would look into it.
As I am sure we could find someone else if we need to, I have asked him to give a definite yes or no answer.
[This message has been edited by Tau Ceti (edited January 27, 2001).]
|
|
|
|
January 28, 2001, 07:37
|
#50
|
Deity
Local Time: 10:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 18,355
|
I think our "Council Session" has clearly shown that Random Events will be off, as that's how the majority votes. No matter is the Sunspot Activity main concern or isn't it.
At the moment, I'm more worried about the presence (non-opresence) of our CMN here. Can't wait to get started.
------------------
Solver - http://www.aok.20m.com
|
|
|
|
January 28, 2001, 19:45
|
#51
|
ACS Staff Member / Hosted Site Admin
Local Time: 10:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 7,524
|
It seems that we have a short fall here.
What's wrong guys?
I can't say that I am in a hurry but waiting and doing nothing looks like a waste.
Can't we find a CMN?
Maybe post a topic?
|
|
|
|
January 28, 2001, 19:56
|
#52
|
King
Local Time: 09:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 2,151
|
Given time constraints, DilithiumDad says no to SMACX. I have asked Aredhran now.
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2001, 05:45
|
#53
|
ACS Staff Member / Hosted Site Admin
Local Time: 10:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 7,524
|
Sad to hear that.
Well, waiting...
[This message has been edited by Keygen (edited January 29, 2001).]
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2001, 12:30
|
#54
|
King
Local Time: 09:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 2,151
|
Aredhran has the map ready, and is waiting for your unit choices. I have explained the 'whatsits' system, so send your choices to him at aredhran@swiftmove.com .
He also requested a game title - is it Keygen's Factions Strife or something else?
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2001, 15:23
|
#55
|
ACS Staff Member / Hosted Site Admin
Local Time: 10:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 7,524
|
So we've got...
1. Game: SMACX
2. CMN: Aredhran (aredhran@swiftmove.com)
3. Game Title: Factions Strife
4. Players factions and order:
a) Keygen -> The University
b) Solver -> Consciousness
c) Tau Ceti -> Spartans
d) Googlie -> Pirates
e) Big Kanuk -> Morganites
f) Misotu -> Hive
g) Mark13 -> Peacekeepers
5. Rules:
Random map
Thinker lavel
All winning conditions allowed
No Blind research
No Random events
Restart eliminated players
Everything else default
6. Whatsits: 200 marks
a) Colony Pod: 30
b) Sea Pod (Pirates only): 30
c) Unity Rover (Sparta only): 30
d) Unity Foil: 30
e) gun foil (Pirates only): 30
f) Former: 20
g) Scout: 10
Is that right?
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2001, 15:39
|
#56
|
Emperor
Local Time: 00:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 9,541
|
Sounds good to me
G.
(But I was going to play the Believers as trhere was so much dissention about the cost of Pirate starting units)
G.
[This message has been edited by Googlie (edited February 01, 2001).]
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2001, 15:54
|
#57
|
King
Local Time: 07:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Northampton, England
Posts: 2,128
|
Weren't we going to bump the cost of sea pods up to 40, or was that just a figment of my imagination?
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2001, 16:14
|
#58
|
Prince
Local Time: 02:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 493
|
No Pirates (kinda liked the name, Ulrika)
I have e-mailed 'Red my shopping cart (1 Colony Pod and 17 fanatics)
hehehe
Sister Rynn Googlieson
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2001, 16:26
|
#59
|
King
Local Time: 09:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 2,151
|
When I asked Aredhran, I told him to use the Believers for Rynn. I also asked him to use time zone order, ie.
Solver
Keygen
Tau Ceti
mark13
Misotu
big_canuk
Rynn
Not the fairly random order Keygen listed...
Kinda late for discussion (I do not think I specified it either way in my mail for 'Red, though), but is there any point in restarting eliminated factions when we have this kind of accelerated start? If you are taken out early, you will be so far behind it is not even funny...
|
|
|
|
February 2, 2001, 02:06
|
#60
|
Emperor
Local Time: 00:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 9,541
|
I agree TC
If we get whomped, we'll bow out gracefully and find an OCC or summat.
No point in restarting with one pod fleeing across a continent.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:58.
|
|