June 5, 1999, 08:31
|
#1
|
Guest
|
hehe here's an idea...
Why can't we have affairs with other leaders.
I mean like, Ceasar and Cleopatra did, didnt they?
I think that would be kind of fun. hehe
|
|
|
|
June 5, 1999, 10:08
|
#2
|
Warlord
Local Time: 08:18
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: HRM, NS, Canada
Posts: 262
|
Please, if you want this idea heard, post it in "Other".
Out here it will certainly be ignored.
|
|
|
|
June 5, 1999, 15:03
|
#3
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 08:18
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 44
|
I think that was a joke...
I think .
|
|
|
|
June 5, 1999, 15:20
|
#4
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 08:18
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 78
|
Very good idea...I loooove it !
Peoples are much too serious ...All this is about fun !Life is about having fun !
More like this please !
Yes, after all male and female (and not only male and female.We must respect homosexuals ...)players should, like Cesar and Cleopatra have all kind of relations...
I am sure out there there are some couples alreday formed thanks to civ multiplayers through the net...Is there ?
|
|
|
|
June 5, 1999, 20:53
|
#5
|
Prince
Local Time: 08:18
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 452
|
Then I want to be Julius Caesar--he was bisexual.
|
|
|
|
June 5, 1999, 21:42
|
#6
|
Guest
|
Why would it be ignored?
|
|
|
|
June 5, 1999, 22:37
|
#7
|
Prince
Local Time: 08:18
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 831
|
You can make it a special event:
"Julius Caeser makes monkey love to Cleopatra. Diplomatic relations improve/you cannot attack this civ for 20 turns."
"Napoleon fails to perform with Catherine the Great. War is declared."
On second thought, I think this is a bad idea... ;-)
|
|
|
|
June 6, 1999, 00:28
|
#8
|
Guest
|
"You can not attack this civ for 20 turns"
no no no...This is not a board game...
What I was thinking of, is an even stronger alliance with the other civ, when the two are together.
Wouldnt it be cool, if your wife was suddenly being attacked, and you had to do everything in your power to save her? hehe
I know I would! Unless she was a nagging cow.
That would make things a lot more fun, in fact I would probably just play the game for just this feature.
hehe, that brings me to another point..Why can't we have Leaders with unique Personalities? Rather than just "Aggressive, Expansionsitic etc" Maybe this belongs in the Enviroment forum?
Oh well
|
|
|
|
June 6, 1999, 13:17
|
#9
|
Prince
Local Time: 08:18
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 831
|
Remember, pure improvement of diplomatic relations only has an effect on AI civs. It would be worthless in multiplayer unless it had some tangible effect (automatic alliance, even if you don't want it, for example).
|
|
|
|
June 6, 1999, 14:20
|
#10
|
Warlord
Local Time: 08:18
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Wales
Posts: 120
|
Alliance through marriage has been the traditional method for Monarchy's, so why not, Maybee your wife/Husband would have to die get divorced before you could start a war with your partners race.
if you went down this line though, it would add loads of dimensions to spying, assasinations, seduction of leaders, etc. getting rid of your own wife in order to get a war going, could cause widespread disruption to your empire, possibly the succession of citys, to other empires.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18.
|
|