quote:
Originally posted by JasonL on 12-06-2000 01:09 PM
It seems he's most critical of the game for being a "Civ II knockoff" rather than "its own game." Which leads me to wonder what he was expecting from a game that clearly set out to be a civ-type game.
|
i fail to understand this logic. what's wrong with a game which takes the civ1/2 format and advances it a step further? or is it that only Sid has the right to do this? i'm sorry but i cant wait until 2002....