Thread Tools
Old March 25, 2000, 12:22   #1
Jim W
Warlord
 
Local Time: 23:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 245
City walls. Are they worth the bother?

Subject line pretty well says it. I find that I very seldom build city walls, save in cases where I have a nearly-isolated city, with heavy-duty enemy forces comeing at me all the time.

What does everybody else say?

Jim W
Jim W is offline  
Old March 25, 2000, 14:19   #2
Vespasian
Settler
 
Local Time: 23:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Reno, Nevada, United States of America
Posts: 20
I always build them. If you share a continent with a warmonger and failed to knock them out earlier on, they're almost essential. The main incentive to build walls, however, is their upkeep cost: 0. That makes it almost always a good thing to build.


------------------
"On ne peut pas apprendre la chance si on n'est pas hardii."-Napolean
[This message has been edited by Vespasian (edited March 25, 2000).]
Vespasian is offline  
Old March 25, 2000, 14:41   #3
The Mad Monk
Emperor
 
The Mad Monk's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Flyover Country
Posts: 4,659
I always shoot for the Great Wall wonder (or its equivalent), and build walls in all of my cities as metallurgy approaches (if I built the GW, it approaches very slowly). It's only good sense; even if you don't lose the city under attack, it's a pain to lose population every time the attacker gets lucky.
The Mad Monk is offline  
Old March 25, 2000, 15:10   #4
Scouse Gits
lifer
Civilization II PBEMTrade Wars / BlackNova TradersGalCiv Apolyton EmpireApolytoners Hall of FameCivilization II Succession Games
Emperor
 
Scouse Gits's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Liverpool, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,344
I don't build walls in every city. I do in the following cases:
1) Capital
2) Wonder cities
3) Ports - Barb dragoons making a surprise attack is the main reason. The barbs seem to "know" the towns on the coast without them!
4) Any city near the front line, and ALWAYS in a city just captured.
I don't have walls in "safe" cities, such as interior cities on my home continent. The exception to the rule about ports, are those one sqaure islands. As yet, I never seen barb marines.
----------
SG (2)
Scouse Gits is offline  
Old March 25, 2000, 17:18   #5
MasterBob
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
City walls are a must if your playing against a human player. I build them anyways. They have no upkeep, so why not?

------------------
Webmaster---Come to the Civworld Forums

"If you cannot beat them, don't join them, instead corrupt them, make them join you, then throw them off a cliff."

"Greatness is measured by how evil you are, the more evil, the greater you become."
 
Old March 25, 2000, 18:00   #6
War4ever
Civilization II MultiplayerCivilization III MultiplayerCivilization II Democracy GameApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
War4ever's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: I live amongst the Red Sox Nation
Posts: 7,969
the two theories i have on walls are this....
1) if you build them early you can sit back and rush other improvements ie markets and libraries... which is good for the long term game especially if you on a large map.
2) if i am on a small map and my opponent is close by i wont bother with walls as i will be rushing units to the slaughter house
War4ever is offline  
Old March 25, 2000, 19:09   #7
Jim W
Warlord
 
Local Time: 23:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 245
One reason for _not_ building walls everywhere is the initial cost; everywhere you're building a wall, you can't build anything else until the wall's done.

I always seem to hit a point, after about the first five cities, where I'm pushed to be able to build anything quickly, and spending money on a wall around a city that doesn't have a demonstrated danger near it seems like poor use of resources to me.


im W
Jim W is offline  
Old March 26, 2000, 00:17   #8
KhanMan
Prince
 
Local Time: 23:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Posts: 691
My view on walls is that I never build them until a front has stopped expanding (ie. when I hit another civ, and I want peace/alliance, or I'm not in the mood to crush them). Then I build walls in cities on that front.

I think the wall's defense bonus combines rather nicely with my frontier towns on forest/mountain/hill squares... I love it when the other guy forgets to do the math, and loses a lot of attacking units.

-KhanMan the paranoid expansionist
KhanMan is offline  
Old March 26, 2000, 10:56   #9
SlowHand
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yes, walls are worth it. I build them in all cities. No maintenace, why not?
 
Old March 26, 2000, 18:32   #10
War4ever
Civilization II MultiplayerCivilization III MultiplayerCivilization II Democracy GameApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
War4ever's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: I live amongst the Red Sox Nation
Posts: 7,969
because while your building walls i have two more settlers per each wall you build thus i have a larger and more powerfull empire including more troops in and out of the field.... these troops will prevent you from reaching my cities
War4ever is offline  
Old March 26, 2000, 20:34   #11
adaMada
Civilization III Democracy GameTrade Wars / BlackNova TradersPtWDG RoleplayRise of Nations MultiplayerInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton Team
King
 
adaMada's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: "The Iron" Stadium, Ubergorsk, Apolytonia (C3DG)
Posts: 1,848
I ALWAYS build city walls, in every city. The 3x defensive bonus is worth it, and I generally don't build too many cities, and defend the ones I do build well. Most of the time, with city walls, only two or three units can hold a city agianst multiple hit-and-run raids.

------------------
adaMada
adaMada is offline  
Old March 26, 2000, 21:17   #12
KhanMan
Prince
 
Local Time: 23:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Posts: 691
aM: Uh, I hate to ask this, but:
How many mp games have you played? My limited experience has been that, when a human player wants your city, (s)he will normally send at least ten units, timed to attack the same turn. You're risking alot my not expanding...

-KhanMan the paranoid expansionist
KhanMan is offline  
Old March 26, 2000, 21:29   #13
War4ever
Civilization II MultiplayerCivilization III MultiplayerCivilization II Democracy GameApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
War4ever's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: I live amongst the Red Sox Nation
Posts: 7,969
KhanMan you hit the nail on the head..... expansion is a must in MP..... if you don't your dead......especially in a small map..
War4ever is offline  
Old March 27, 2000, 10:43   #14
Sieve Too
Prince
 
Local Time: 23:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 917
In SP against the AI, don't bother. Build two more Settlers instead. Get Elephants/Crusaders and Diplos early. Connect your cities with roads. Rush units to the attack point and take out the AI before they strike even once at your city.

You should make it a habit to engage the AI outside of your city radii. There's nothing more annoying or harder to get rid of than a fortified AI Phalanx sitting on your mined hill. And if you're really unlucky, the AI and barbs will pillage all your hard-earned mines, irrigation and roads.
What good is a wall protected city to you if it can't produce anything?
Sieve Too is offline  
Old March 27, 2000, 11:16   #15
tobyr
Prince
 
Local Time: 23:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Princeton, NJ USA
Posts: 312
Build city walls, but do not build them too soon!

If you build them early, the cost in lost turns, when you could have built something else, is too great. The biggest potential cost is that you could have founded a number of additional cities instead of building walls. I would rather build four more cities and lose one, than put up walls to protect the six cities I already had.

A great feature of the great wall wonder is that by the time it expires, it only costs you a few turns to build real walls.

I play the ToT 4-map fantasy game, in which the considerations for building walls are somewhat different:

Underground and undersea, you can postpone walls a long time unless under heavy attack.

On ground level, you need walls usually before 1AD to deal with powerful barbarians.

In the sky, you need walls a little later, also to deal with very powerful barbarians.

Many of the tribes in the fantasy game have a good defensive unit that can really hold a city if it has a wall (unless attacked by dragon or Kraken barbarians early in the game).

The great wall ("Excaliber") expires earlier in the fantasy game, sometimes right after you build it. Also, in the fantasy game you are relatively likely to want to bribe a few expensive barbarians (250 to 500 gold each) around 1 AD. Where do you get
gold like that? When desperate, you can sell some city walls!
- toby


------------------
toby robison
criticalpaths@mindspring.com
tobyr is offline  
Old March 27, 2000, 15:45   #16
Steve Clark
King
 
Steve Clark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,555
Since I only build 10-12 cities, I always build walls (usually by the Great Wall and then individually in most of my cities after Metallurgy). The reason? Put a couple Pikemen behind those walls and you don't have to worry about defenses for a long, long time (against the AI of course). The GW is not the first improvement I build. I usually wait until I can use caravans to built it all. Once the GW or walls are built, I just concentrate on building up my science city, cranking out millions of caravans and then enough units to clobber the enemies.
Steve Clark is offline  
Old March 27, 2000, 17:18   #17
inca911
Warlord
 
Local Time: 23:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 271
I enjoy building up the heart of my empire, a dozen perfect cities, and will build city walls only in chokepoint cities unless an imminent threat makes a rush-built wall a necessity. This happens very seldom since I use a lot of fortresses to prevent anyone from approaching my cities, and stacked units on the front line to prevent bribery. My opinion is if you've let anyone get so close to your cities that you are counting on walls to save you, you have a poor defense which is inviting trouble. There is no doubt that the Great Wall is very nice if you are building/ conquering tons of small cities and rushing off with minimal defense for them. I simply dislike the micromanagement aspect of so many small cities so I never bother with building the Great Wall. I think your civ style largely dictates how much you like this Wonder or city walls in general. Perfectionists love walls to keep them safe. Conquerers don't like them since they have no intent on staying put in any one place for a period of time.
inca911 is offline  
Old March 27, 2000, 19:43   #18
The Mad Viking
King
 
The Mad Viking's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: of the Great White North
Posts: 1,790
I don't build very many. (vs AI)

I build the Great Wall. What no-one's mentioned is the tremendous diplomatic advantage it gives you. People fall all over themselves to offer cease-fires and treaties. It lets you concentrate on growth and research.

It also lets you build a city in enemy territory, because the wall is there instantly
I delay metallurgy, have embassies to check if another civ is researching it, and only then build walls in perimeter cities. By then I'm more than ready to kick @$$. If I lose an odd city to Barbs its easy to take back, but I hate giving up an advance to another CIV.
The Mad Viking is offline  
Old March 27, 2000, 20:56   #19
The Mad Monk
Emperor
 
The Mad Monk's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Flyover Country
Posts: 4,659
You delay metallurgy too???

Ever consider how fitting that is, considering the original builders of the Great Wall and what they did with their gunpowder (or didn't do...)?
The Mad Monk is offline  
Old March 28, 2000, 01:09   #20
arii
Prince
 
Local Time: 23:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: St-Louis MO USA
Posts: 533
Almost never build them. I prefere to expand, and have a few offensive units on hand for when the opponent gets close. Also I never attack cities with walls; I use dips to get the wall down 1st. So when you feel all safe behind your walls, the next thing you know the wall is down and 3-4 crusaders are coming at you (and you wasted a lot of shields building the wall).
arii is offline  
Old March 28, 2000, 04:31   #21
mindseye
King
 
mindseye's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:32
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: A Yankee living in Shanghai
Posts: 1,149
Hey, the Chinese did a LOT with gunpowder!

During the Ming dynasty they had cannons, firearms, sidewheeler riverboats equipped with fireball-hurtling catapults, concussion bombs, smoke shells, beautiful bird-shaped incendiary rocket-bombs, and - coolest of all - anti-ship cruise missiles!

I saw a model of one of these two-stage missiles in a Hong Kong museum. The name translates as "dragon rising from the water". It looked like a torpedo with an elaborate, carved dragon's head and finned tail. Attached were four angled rockets which allowed it to skim above the water's surface. Once it neared the target vessel, a volley of rocket-propelled arrows streaked out of dragon head's open mouth. What a terror weapon!

For a short period in the early 1400's the Chinese could muster fleets of hundreds of ships. The largest were 12-masted giants, triple the size of the biggest American clipper ships. Imagine if one of these fleets, equipped with cruise missiles, had shown up off the mouth of the Thames in 1430! Probably we Americans would now be saying "Ni hau" instead of "Hello"!

- mindseye

mindseye is offline  
Old March 29, 2000, 19:20   #22
Black Bart
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've been building more walls lately. But only on coastal and frontier cities which I can't fortify quikly (not connected by roads etc). But even with them the barbs have been tearing me up. I had a pikeman within walls on a city on a hill and they still got wasted easily from barbs. I was quite mad. I still need offensive units to take these guys out. But I need walls for the coastal cities because the barbs land and attack in the same turn.
 
Old March 29, 2000, 19:35   #23
Steve Clark
King
 
Steve Clark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,555
What kind of barbs are clobbering your pikemen?
Steve Clark is offline  
Old March 30, 2000, 00:43   #24
Adam Smith
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
King
 
Adam Smith's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 1,631
Against the AI, I build city walls only around my capital (wonders) and super science city. Otherwise I use mobile defense. You can build a dip and a crusader for less than the shield cost of walls in one city. Centrally located with good roads, these two units can cover four to six cities each. In case of attack, bribe the first wave of units with dip, then attack with the bribed units and crusader. Sell the walls once you have a good railroad system, since at that point you can immediately bring in units from anywhere.

------------------
"I fear that I shall die a Prince."
-Edward VII, Prince of Wales

Adam Smith is offline  
Old March 30, 2000, 02:28   #25
War4ever
Civilization II MultiplayerCivilization III MultiplayerCivilization II Democracy GameApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
War4ever's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: I live amongst the Red Sox Nation
Posts: 7,969
Inca911.... your statement about perfectionists liking walls and conquerers not becaue they never stay put is oh so true...

If i am conquering , there is no way i would waste resources on walls, hell even on an enemies home soil.

the reason why? Purely becasue my invasion force is usually so large that he wont get close, plus i attack in multiple fronts to confuse people and yes sometimes myself

Second is that if he comes with dips, the first thing to go are the walls as the newly conquered city is likely to have lost most but not always all of the other improvements, therefore i don't waste the resources on them.

If i am on multiple islands, ie any place building more settlers for expansion, then i will wall up my core island cities, ie the ones on the same mass as my capital. No point in leaving myself vulnerable, although city walls dont make the paranoid warmonger in me more complacent, especially since walls come down so easy and then your ripe for the picking, so i often have the huge task force awaiting potential poachers or glory hunters. However sometimes accidents occur and i have to fire the military advisor, after i rebuild my civ from ruin

Well its not quite that bad , but i have taken some damage at times, not even mongol armour is inpregnable

War4ever is offline  
Old March 30, 2000, 08:10   #26
SlowHand
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I didnt say I built walls as first improvement, W4E. I said I build them. Has nottadamnthing to do with expanding.
 
Old March 30, 2000, 21:04   #27
War4ever
Civilization II MultiplayerCivilization III MultiplayerCivilization II Democracy GameApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
War4ever's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: I live amongst the Red Sox Nation
Posts: 7,969
slowhand i guess i am misinformed then, i know all you said is that you build them, i was taking it as i dont' build them in the early game, i assumed you did, sorry
War4ever is offline  
Old April 3, 2000, 13:48   #28
Aurelius
Prince
 
Local Time: 23:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 428
Hey, one good thing about building city walls is tearing them down to rush buy a wonder...

AU
Aurelius is offline  
Old April 3, 2000, 15:11   #29
SilverDragon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think that city walls need to be built, but only very late. The units in the early game that can win against a fortified defensive unit (phalanx, pikeman, musketeers, riflemen, alpine troops, mech. inf.) are attack units. (catapults, cannons, artillery, howitzer) The solution is to build a mounted unit. (horseman, elephant, dragoons, calvary.) The mounted units can beat the attack unit before it gets to the city. After armors, though, you need city walls, or you will be blasted into oblivion.



------------------
Long live the Communists!
-- SilverDragon
 
Old April 3, 2000, 15:53   #30
DaveV
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
King
 
DaveV's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: USA - EDT (GMT-5)
Posts: 2,051
The greatest danger to cities in single-player is the barbarian pirates. If a shipload of crusaders or dragoons lands on clear land next to one of your cities, they can take it out in a flash. Once Chivalry is discovered, I will build walls in any coastal city that I can't afford to lose. Generally, the only city I can't afford to lose is my capital. The alternative to walls is to convert any coastal grass/plains/tundra/desert to slower terrain.

In multi-player, of course, it's a different story...
DaveV is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:32.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team