April 29, 2000, 21:47
|
#1
|
Prince
Local Time: 18:34
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: New Jersey, USA, Earth, Sol, Milky Way
Posts: 705
|
Calculating required beakers
Has the formula for tech research been worked out?
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2000, 13:21
|
#2
|
Emperor
Local Time: 15:34
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: SF, CA don't call it frisco... Striker!!
Posts: 3,617
|
Kind of.
There is an old thread called "A list of Data" by Caesar the Great where someone eventually got a formula worked out to be something like tech calc = M[(a+1)*(b+1)*r] where M is the map size, a is the incremental advance number, b is a derivative of the advance number and r is adjusted dependant on how far ahead you are.
Not really much help, I am afraid, other than to show that it is a squares sum and not exponential - whereas civ growth is exponential. So eventually you will get a tech cascade, if you play the game effectively.
|
|
|
|
May 2, 2000, 15:52
|
#3
|
Prince
Local Time: 18:34
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: New Jersey, USA, Earth, Sol, Milky Way
Posts: 705
|
Thanks Sten. That helps alot.
|
|
|
|
May 2, 2000, 23:40
|
#4
|
King
Local Time: 17:34
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Keeper of the Can-O'Whoopass
Posts: 1,104
|
That formula looks like what I was seeing, BUT...where the hell does the tech paradigm fit in??? Arrggh...
Boy figuring that formula must have been a *****...
Anyone have a disassembler?
Venger
|
|
|
|
May 4, 2000, 13:10
|
#5
|
Emperor
Local Time: 15:34
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: SF, CA don't call it frisco... Striker!!
Posts: 3,617
|
Cross link to the affiliated ToT thread...
http://apolyton.net/forums/Forum29/H...tml?date=17:58
I can only assume from the ToT posts that the tech paradigm is an additional calculation like the M that is outside of the basic (a+1)*(b+1) since it doesn't appear to change the eventual flattening nature of the results curve.
I can't remember my math terms, but there is a name for a parabolic curve that is increasing at a decreasing rate... sorry, I periodically attended calc at 8:00 in the morning 15 years ago.
|
|
|
|
May 6, 2000, 00:23
|
#6
|
King
Local Time: 23:34
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: of the Great White North
Posts: 1,790
|
Asymptote, or Asymptotal curve, IIRC. 20 years for me, so ICBM. (I could be mistakend, not intercontinental...)
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:34.
|
|