May 26, 2001, 03:20
|
#1
|
Warlord
Local Time: 10:22
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 141
|
Eliminate repeated city name
In civ2, if you have many cities, you may come out to have 3 ashington, 4 Philadephia, 5 Boston or so. This is not a great problem, but often a nuisance. So I propose that there shall not be 2 cities of the same name at the same time. Just for convenience.
|
|
|
|
May 26, 2001, 05:58
|
#2
|
Emperor
Local Time: 12:22
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,491
|
Yeah, there should be much longer city name lists for each civilization... and I don't think we even need a 'leftover' list, what do you think?
|
|
|
|
May 26, 2001, 06:03
|
#3
|
Technical Director
Local Time: 12:22
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chalmers, Sweden
Posts: 9,294
|
Don't you look in Atlases?
In the real world there are a lot of cities with the same name, why not in Civilization?
|
|
|
|
May 26, 2001, 11:34
|
#4
|
Warlord
Local Time: 12:22
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Turkey
Posts: 166
|
When I have that many cities, I either add a number to the repeated name, or invent a silly new one. Besides, if they give you 500 names, you'll build 1000 cities just to exceed the limit.
note: I didn't try this, but is the alternative-list (when you exceed your civ's cities) expandable?
|
|
|
|
May 26, 2001, 11:51
|
#5
|
King
Local Time: 11:22
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,728
|
Re: Eliminate repeated city name
Quote:
|
Originally posted by colossus
In civ2, if you have many cities, you may come out to have 3 ashington, 4 Philadephia, 5 Boston or so. This is not a great problem, but often a nuisance.
|
Why this crave for ICS-style city-spreading? I dont get it.
Anyway - if you have read some of the updates lately, and lay 2 and 2 together, you should figure out that Civ-3 is destined to be a very different game, compared with the older versions, in terms of above playingstyle.
|
|
|
|
May 26, 2001, 13:22
|
#6
|
King
Local Time: 05:22
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: by Divine Right
Posts: 1,014
|
Expanded city names shouldn't be hard to implement, so for those who actually go with the auto-naming function, I think it's a good idea.
Personally though, I never use that. I like to make up my own civ name (e.g. 1-the Valiant, 2-the Mariners, 3-the High Ones, etc.) and then I name each city along the theme of my civ (1-Valor, Honour, Glory, 2-Marinus, Oceanus, Hydros, 3-Citadel, Paradise, Bastion, Everclear, Light, Starseed, etc...) More fun, more personal, more connection to the game.
The other thing I usually do is name each city after location and nearby terrain (e.g. Silk Forests, Buffalo Plains, Buffalo Hills, Eastport, Northport, South Coast, Isthmus Jungle, Canal city, Iron Hills, Verdant, Hill Lake, etc...)
It helps me to keep track of things really easily. What also helps is that I rename cities when something happens (e.g. Bastion would be a key choke point, Intrepid would be a beachhead on another continent, Power City would be a manufacturing centre, Excelsior would be a sci city,and so on....)
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:22.
|
|