May 29, 2000, 15:05
|
#1
|
Emperor
Local Time: 00:36
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Castellón, Spain
Posts: 3,571
|
Has anybody ever tried simplified combat???
after a few years playing civ and civ2 I decided to try the simplified combat and I don't like at all and also I don't see the point.
Does anybody know why it is there???
What is the point??
|
|
|
|
May 29, 2000, 20:05
|
#2
|
Guest
|
Its the Civ1 system, without HP or FP. Its for people who liked the civ1 combat.
|
|
|
|
May 29, 2000, 23:13
|
#3
|
Emperor
Local Time: 18:36
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Yongsan-Gu, Seoul
Posts: 3,647
|
Without HP and FP it is possible to conquer far faster, 1 tank can take out a whole city of riflemen for example.
|
|
|
|
May 29, 2000, 23:14
|
#4
|
Emperor
Local Time: 15:36
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: I live amongst the Red Sox Nation
Posts: 7,969
|
or you can have disaterous losses, i tried it and i like the new system better
|
|
|
|
May 30, 2000, 09:37
|
#5
|
Emperor
Local Time: 18:36
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Yongsan-Gu, Seoul
Posts: 3,647
|
I think the old system is more favourable to the AI.
|
|
|
|
May 30, 2000, 14:56
|
#6
|
Emperor
Local Time: 23:36
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Liverpool, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,344
|
Yes, I tried it once - never again!
--------
SG (2)
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2000, 08:56
|
#7
|
Prince
Local Time: 00:36
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Carthage.
Posts: 362
|
I've done it once. Partly out of nostalgia to Civ I, and partly because I was starting a game on a very islandy map. The advantage is, that your ships will either sink after a battle, or win and be able to cruise along at top speed. How I hate it when one of your ships sustains heavy damage, and then has to wait a dozen turns or so somewhere at the North-pole or wherever before it can continue at full speed! IMHO, the simplified combat has its use in a heavy naval-based game, otherwise it is best left unused. The hitpoints system is much more realistic.
------------------
Ceterum censeo Romanem esse delendam.
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2000, 11:03
|
#8
|
Guest
|
Tried it once... a warrior took out my pikeman! NEVER again.
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2000, 11:13
|
#9
|
Prince
Local Time: 23:36
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Livingstone, Lord Protector of London
Posts: 433
|
At first i thought the new system sucked when i changed from civ to civ2, but then i forgot how it used to be and embraced what it is, now i can't stand how it was and just play it as it is!!!! does that make sense? or am i waffling again... Gazes off into space..
I actually played the orignal about a month ago, i found it on the internet (whoops, am i allowed to say that out loud???) but i didn't get more than about 2000 years before i got fed up with the way it played. Maybe i'll give it a proper go one time for nostalgias sake, or whatever!!!
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2000, 16:30
|
#10
|
Guest
|
|
|
|
|
June 3, 2000, 02:37
|
#11
|
The Empress
Local Time: 17:36
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: cause mingy loves me
Posts: 2,699
|
umm.. where is the option for simplified combat?
|
|
|
|
June 3, 2000, 02:59
|
#12
|
Emperor
Local Time: 00:36
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Zwolle, The Netherlands
Posts: 6,737
|
When you start a game one of the options is customize rules. If you select that you can check simplified combat.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:36.
|
|