June 20, 2001, 02:04
|
#1
|
|
Deity
Local Time: 20:57
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: In a tunnel under the DMZ
Posts: 12,273
|
I would prefer civ 2.5 to something stupid
I think most of you have very unrealistic ideas about what this game will be like. You have wasted so much time on wishful suggestions you are bound to be disappointed.
I would prefer civ 2.5 to something "daring" that looks pretty but won't play as good.
Let's learn the lesson of Call to Power!
|
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2001, 02:20
|
#2
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 18:57
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 346
|
Remember the lession of Civ2 TOT....
__________________
|
Originally Posted by Theben
|
|
Maybe we should push for a law that requires microbiology to be discussed in all bible study courses?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2001, 22:49
|
#3
|
|
Deity
Local Time: 20:57
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: In a tunnel under the DMZ
Posts: 12,273
|
Good Point
You're not such a moron after all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2001, 23:36
|
#4
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 06:57
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: USA
Posts: 3,197
|
C'mon AH, this is the 21st century, the Third Millenium! We must have a Civ to fit the occasion.
__________________
"I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2001, 20:16
|
#5
|
|
Deity
Local Time: 20:57
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: In a tunnel under the DMZ
Posts: 12,273
|
Aaargh!!
What? You want chaos, panic and disorder?
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2001, 21:46
|
#6
|
Local Time: 06:57
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: on the corner of Peachtree and Peachtree
Posts: 30,698
|
Well said, Horsie!
We should have a game that is good to play first and then see where the radical ideas can fit in. We should be cautious with changing Civ, and make slow changes. Culture and resources are advancing Civ without destroying the underlying game.
__________________
“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2001, 21:50
|
#7
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 05:57
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Life Goes On
Posts: 519
|
nah id like to see new things in civ...... who says it cant be radical and play well?
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 22, 2001, 04:10
|
#8
|
|
Warlord
Local Time: 10:57
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 141
|
CIVER'S WISHES
I agree totally with AH.
Among the many suggestions and wishes voiced in this forum, most are concerned with improvement of existing feature/system rather than replacement with a new one. Top of priority includes better AI, tuning down certain WOWs, and Democracy and Fundy. None of these are revolutionary, but together they represent such a refinement of civ2 that many people will be content that such is civ3(civ2.5?).
Note that suggestions like Social Engineering, Minor Civ, Unit Workshop, Stacked Combat, etc never generate much concensus among civers, and there is no indication that their implemention will make civ3 FUNNIER. I think that civ3 better concentrates on refinement on civ2 rather than something revolutionary or the beautiful but pointless graphics.
Civ2 has earned its status as Classical Strategy Game through the test of time. If we want civ3 to be durable, we better maintain the backbone of civ2 rather than ambitiously jettisoning the well tested features.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:57.
|
|
