June 20, 2001, 10:42
|
#1
|
Prince
Local Time: 11:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Warsaw, European Union
Posts: 938
|
Government question
I have a question (maybe it has already been discussed, but I can't find it ) :
Was it anywhere officially confirmed that we will have Civ/CTP government model rather than SMAC SE model in Civ III?
(The existence of two inventions, Democracy and Republic, does not settle the matter, as they just may allow to use different SE models)
Martinus
__________________
The problem with leadership is inevitably: Who will play God?
- Frank Herbert
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2001, 11:35
|
#2
|
King
Local Time: 12:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bubblewrap
Posts: 2,032
|
i don't know how government is handled in civ3, but what does SE stands for.
and why do i get a message saying
error at line 150
expected ')'
everytime i come to this site
__________________
<Kassiopeia> you don't keep the virgins in your lair at a sodomising distance from your beasts or male prisoners. If you devirginised them yourself, though, that's another story. If they devirginised each other, then, I hope you had that webcam running.
Play Bumps! No, wait, play Slings!
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2001, 11:38
|
#3
|
Prince
Local Time: 11:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Warsaw, European Union
Posts: 938
|
SE stands for Social Engineering - it was a feature in SMAC allowing you to choose different aspects of your socio-politic system rather than one government.
And I don't know about the error
__________________
The problem with leadership is inevitably: Who will play God?
- Frank Herbert
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2001, 11:43
|
#4
|
Settler
Local Time: 05:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5
|
Firaxis has announced that Civ3 will not use the SE model from SMAC. This probably means that they will use the government model ala Civ2, but probably with minor changes.
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2001, 11:44
|
#5
|
Prince
Local Time: 11:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Warsaw, European Union
Posts: 938
|
Thanks, Tssha
__________________
The problem with leadership is inevitably: Who will play God?
- Frank Herbert
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2001, 11:54
|
#6
|
King
Local Time: 12:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bubblewrap
Posts: 2,032
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Tssha
Firaxis has announced that Civ3 will not use the SE model from SMAC. This probably means that they will use the government model ala Civ2, but probably with minor changes.
|
too bad, i rather liked that model from SMAC....i think....i played it a long time ago.
this way you could make your own perfect "government"
__________________
<Kassiopeia> you don't keep the virgins in your lair at a sodomising distance from your beasts or male prisoners. If you devirginised them yourself, though, that's another story. If they devirginised each other, then, I hope you had that webcam running.
Play Bumps! No, wait, play Slings!
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2001, 11:57
|
#7
|
Prince
Local Time: 05:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Life Goes On
Posts: 519
|
i think you should be ablee to combine different govternemts that they provide for you, resulting in a simpler yet more personalized govt.
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2001, 13:23
|
#8
|
Emperor
Local Time: 05:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: flying too low to the ground
Posts: 4,625
|
i know im going to get pummeled with "WHERES THE DAMN SOURCE" but i KNOW theyre using civ2 style govts.
they said Fundamantalism was removed and Nationalism is a less extreme replacement.
so obviously theres civ2 style govts.
__________________
"I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
- Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2001, 18:31
|
#9
|
Deity
Local Time: 11:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Germans own my soul.
Posts: 14,861
|
Yeah, I liked the concept of social engineering. I am surprised they haven't hung on to the concept of it in various ways.
For example, you would be able to select the main government which would have it's various modifiers, but you would be able to select certain other options and they would have other modifiers, such as perhaps welfare state, colonialism, stuff like that, you get the idea, that would also have an effect on the functioning of your society...
__________________
Speaking of Erith:
"It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2001, 18:39
|
#10
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 11:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 78
|
Quote:
|
they said Fundamantalism was removed and Nationalism is a less extreme replacement.
|
I don't think they ever said Nationalism will be a government. Although there was once an ambiguous mentioning of it in a preview (sorry, me too, no sources), it will probably be an advance required to use armies.
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2001, 02:28
|
#11
|
King
Local Time: 03:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,747
|
Quote:
|
For example, you would be able to select the main government which would have it's various modifiers, but you would be able to select certain other options and they would have other modifiers, such as perhaps welfare state, colonialism, stuff like that, you get the idea, that would also have an effect on the functioning of your society...
|
It would be awesome if they would have it this way. I liked being able to have certain adjustments in my government (ala SMAC) but I also like the base gov't model of Civ2. So why don't they put the two together to make an ultimate gov't model?
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2001, 03:18
|
#12
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Asia Pacific
Posts: 611
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Lemmy
and why do i get a message saying
error at line 150
expected ')'
everytime i come to this site
|
I don't know, but i get it too sometimes.
__________________
Alex
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2001, 05:18
|
#13
|
Deity
Local Time: 11:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Germans own my soul.
Posts: 14,861
|
Absolutely TechWins. There are many different types of democracy; look at the US model compared to the European model for example; two different ways of doing democracy. Look at different types of Monarchy either. Perhaps, for example, Feudalism could bring the option of a feudalism within monarchy!
__________________
Speaking of Erith:
"It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2001, 11:14
|
#14
|
Emperor
Local Time: 05:58
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: flying too low to the ground
Posts: 4,625
|
as a PHP-hoe i know thats a coding error.
and it's pretty simple to understand for all you non-coders.
on the 150th line of code
there is a missing ).
() are used in two ways, to enforce the order of operations, or to call a function.
I CAN USE THE COOL PHP CODE HIGHLIGHT BUTTON!
PHP Code:
|
$num = (4+3)*(9-2); //order of operations
$sum = addnums(4,3); //calling a function that returns an int.
|
so SOMEONE ::not looking at MarkG:: made an error in coding, and simple forgot a parenthecie (i can't spell).
it's a common error, easily fixed, infact i usually forget semicolons
__________________
"I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
- Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:58.
|
|