August 15, 2000, 20:07
|
#1
|
Guest
|
Strategy Committee?
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2000, 20:20
|
#2
|
Retired
Local Time: 18:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Mingapulco - CST
Posts: 30,317
|
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2000, 20:29
|
#3
|
Guest
|
Do you call this pothole a strategy discusion forum?! This is pathetic! Im talking about REAL, deep strategy!
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2000, 20:35
|
#4
|
Prince
Local Time: 18:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 334
|
quote:
Originally posted by Somgu on 08-15-2000 08:29 PM
Do you call this pothole a strategy discusion forum?! This is pathetic! Im talking about REAL, deep strategy!
|
The thing is, several of the best players have been posting here for a year and a half. Most real, deep strategy has discussed to death, probably several times. It gets boring talking about the same thing again and again, so don't expect a daily thesis on the best ways to win the game.
I would suggest a walk throught the archives.
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2000, 21:02
|
#5
|
Settler
Local Time: 23:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Rome, Heart of the Roman Empire
Posts: 17
|
Yes, but I think his idea could be helpful, but then some of us would have to give away some of our best tricks
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2000, 21:07
|
#6
|
Emperor
Local Time: 15:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: SF, CA don't call it frisco... Striker!!
Posts: 3,617
|
I nominate Somgu to collate all the collected threads from here and the archives and present them in a concise, well organized format for a starting point to discussions on REAL strategy.
do we have a second??
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2000, 21:11
|
#7
|
Emperor
Local Time: 15:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Civ2 Diehard
Posts: 3,838
|
I second.
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2000, 21:56
|
#8
|
King
Local Time: 23:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,597
|
A second second. However Somgu would not have that much to do if he could give CR a hand with the document conversions in the converging thread http://apolyton.net/forums/Forum3/HTML/001343.html
Edit: Corrected Somgu spelling
[This message has been edited by tonic (edited August 15, 2000).]
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2000, 21:58
|
#9
|
Guest
|
Ok,Ok. I'll do it. Ill try to collect as much stuff from this forum as posible and put it in one thread, or maybe a few. But I just started school, so it will be more difficult than it would be in the summer.
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2000, 22:11
|
#10
|
Guest
|
Never mind, I can't do this. I have neither the time nor the patience. And Im tired of being called Somgu!
Somegu...?
Somguy...?
Someguy...?
SOME GUY!
<font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by Somgu (edited August 15, 2000).]</font>
[This message has been edited by Somgu (edited August 15, 2000).]
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2000, 22:13
|
#11
|
Emperor
Local Time: 15:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: SF, CA don't call it frisco... Striker!!
Posts: 3,617
|
Just giving you a hard time.
It would make sense to compile some of the collected wisdom into a word document, but maybe we just set out to write a guide from scratch instead of copy and pasting threads. If we just used raw threads it might be 5,000 pages long!!
A sticky thread would need to be short or it would clog up the forum speed...
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2000, 22:13
|
#12
|
Emperor
Local Time: 15:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Civ2 Diehard
Posts: 3,838
|
allrighty then.As Ming says:
case closed
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2000, 22:19
|
#13
|
Retired
Local Time: 18:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Mingapulco - CST
Posts: 30,317
|
HEY... You are stealing my best lines
Just use the search feature on the strategy section, or the strategy archive to find what you need. It would be way to much work to pull together the years of discussions that many of us have had.
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2000, 22:35
|
#14
|
King
Local Time: 23:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,597
|
If only the Archives were a bit more fool-proof to use (cf the explication by Markos in the Apolyton forum). I recall problems accessing some of the pioneering work with listing threads in themes (Theben comes to mind, among others) - many of the links don't work.
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2000, 07:36
|
#15
|
Emperor
Local Time: 01:41
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,054
|
It wouldn't just be copying and pasting threads one after another. That is only the raw data which has to be commented, supplemented and edited in all sorts of ways.
Question is, will such a strategy guide be of any use when Civ III is that close?
Carolus
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2000, 19:53
|
#16
|
King
Local Time: 23:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,597
|
I have a gut feeling that there will be a few civ2 die-hards left who will be finding new challenges well into the Civ III era. Seeing that there is still a sentimental attachment to Civ I, the systematic compilation would at worst stand as a work of some historical significance. In any case how imminent is the new release?
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2000, 19:58
|
#17
|
Emperor
Local Time: 15:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Civ2 Diehard
Posts: 3,838
|
Long way away yet.
And if its no good(50/50 chance at best based on other trys)then Civ2 will continue.
It may be impossible to improve on without losing mass-market appeal.Civ 2 may never die.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:41.
|
|