|
View Poll Results: Are thread length limits good?
|
|
No, threads should go on indefinitely until everyone has said everything possible
|
|
7 |
58.33% |
Yes, the old limit of 150 was good
|
|
2 |
16.67% |
Yes, but we should have a higher limit than before
|
|
3 |
25.00% |
|
July 3, 2001, 04:23
|
#1
|
Emperor
Local Time: 19:16
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,373
|
Thread length limits: To return or not?
I've noticed that we have quite a number of threads all over the boards which are currently up to 200+ or 300+ posts. Before the switch, the limit was 150.
Is this a good development or not?
|
|
|
|
July 3, 2001, 05:00
|
#2
|
Retired
Local Time: 06:16
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Mingapulco - CST
Posts: 30,317
|
The new limit is 500. The new software should be able to handle it. We will just have to wait and see
__________________
Keep on Civin'
Civ V Civilization V Civ5 CivV Civilization 5 Civ 5 - Do your part!
|
|
|
|
July 3, 2001, 05:24
|
#3
|
Emperor
Local Time: 19:16
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,373
|
I didn't know that
Could you change that third poll option, then, Ming....please?
|
|
|
|
July 3, 2001, 05:33
|
#4
|
Deity
Local Time: 19:16
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
Posts: 14,606
|
I didn't know that, either
I thought the limit was removed.
|
|
|
|
July 3, 2001, 06:30
|
#5
|
Deity
Local Time: 12:16
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Germans own my soul.
Posts: 14,861
|
Well the 150 post limit was only there for one of speed of the forums. And very few threads reach 500 anyway.
__________________
Speaking of Erith:
"It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith
|
|
|
|
July 3, 2001, 13:18
|
#6
|
Emperor
Local Time: 05:16
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seoul Korea
Posts: 4,344
|
in the old forums, things got buggy when the threads got big. presumably, these new forums can handle more. so whats the need for the 150 limit?
ming, perhaps the forums can handle more than 500 even?. .
__________________
-connorkimbro
"We're losing the war on AIDS. And drugs. And poverty. And terror. But we sure took it to those Nazis. Man, those were the days."
-theonion.com
|
|
|
|
July 3, 2001, 22:21
|
#7
|
Emperor
Local Time: 19:16
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,373
|
For one thing, the thread listings page of each forum only links to the first, second, third and last pages of each thread. That means you have to open up one of those pages and then click on the 'next page' link, if say you wanted to see page 5 of 8.
|
|
|
|
July 4, 2001, 09:33
|
#8
|
Deity
Local Time: 21:16
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Between Coast and Mountains
Posts: 14,475
|
ok thats what last page means !! i thought it meant no more room to post !!!
__________________
GM of MAFIA #40 ,#41, #43, #45,#47,#49-#51,#53-#58,#61,#68,#70, #71
|
|
|
|
July 5, 2001, 15:41
|
#9
|
Local Time: 11:16
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Deity of Lists
Posts: 11,873
|
I found a bug with the thread length limits:
After it reaches page 6 the thread's address does not tell the thread ID... it merely says Post # (if you had ever posted in the thread)
__________________
-->Visit CGN!
-->"Production! More Production! Production creates Wealth! Production creates more Jobs!"-Wendell Willkie -1944
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16.
|
|