Thread Tools
Old July 25, 2001, 13:09   #1
Alynzia
Warlord
 
Alynzia's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Norwich City
Posts: 166
Faction Ideology in Social Engineering
There are restrictions for factions based on their ideologies, as in each faction has an aversion to some kind of social engineering choice.

I was just idly speculating as to just what choices each faction would make if they were running their empires based solely on ideology with no practical aspects.

The choices would be stupid on occasion, amplifying strengths and weaknesses present in the social factors intrinsic to each faction.

I'll probably get ignored, but if anyone has a point of view for any faction and the politics, economics, values and future society they would run based on ideology I'd be interested.

For example, the Gaians would probably be Democratic, Green, Knowledge and Eudaimonic.

In short, hippies, the lot of them! Not too sure about the future society choice, because cybernetic gives the +2 Planet rating. Would Deirdre hand over her administration to computers so she could spend more time dancing naked through the trees?

This of course has no relevance to the game, unless you really like to get into character...
Alynzia is offline  
Old July 25, 2001, 14:02   #2
Tenchusatsu
Warlord
 
Local Time: 11:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Portland, OR (rolling and very rainy)
Posts: 230
I think it's more interesting to talk about SE choices that are available to factions but seem out-of-place. For example, take Fundamentalist. It would make sense if the Gaians go Fundy, especially if they want to go on a temporary ecoterrorism rampage. But Morgan? What would that guy want to be so Fundamentalist about?

Another example: Yang can choose a Free Market, especially if he also adds Wealth and Golden Age to get to the critical point of +2 Economy. But would such choices make sense given his ideals for an atheistic police state?

One more example: Santiago can choose any SE setting except Wealth. But it seems all the SE settings available to her make perfect sense. Free Market? Yeah, a free market for guns. Green? Only to support an army of mindworms. Knowledge? Of course, they're always researching new ways to kill!
Tenchusatsu is offline  
Old July 25, 2001, 16:19   #3
Kirnwaffen
Warlord
 
Kirnwaffen's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 281
Just a thought on Yang. Strictly by ideology, his future society would have to be thought control, IMHO.

I'd like to know what people think about Lal's future society. I think he would most certainly be Dem/Green/Knowledge/Eudaimonic, but he could also be cybernetic. What does everyone think?
__________________
"Beauty is not in the face...Beauty is a light in the heart." - Kahlil Gibran
"The greatest happiness of life is the conviction that we are loved; loved for ourselves, or rather, loved in spite of ourselves" - Victor Hugo
"It is noble to be good; it is still nobler to teach others to be good -- and less trouble." - Mark Twain
Kirnwaffen is offline  
Old July 25, 2001, 17:02   #4
death_head
Prince
 
Local Time: 05:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Caledonia, IL, USA
Posts: 388
Lal is the opposite of Yang and Sparta, thus, he is a capitalist, thus, he would choose wealth...damn Arab oil shieks (no offense to any Arabs)
death_head is offline  
Old July 25, 2001, 17:06   #5
Kassiopeia
Alpha Centauri Democracy GameGalCiv Apolyton EmpireApolyton Storywriters' GuildCivilization II Democracy GameApolytoners Hall of FameACDG3 Spartans
Emperor
 
Kassiopeia's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Aperture Science Enrichment Center
Posts: 8,638
would Lal give´up his democratic powress to an AI? I think not... Eudaimonia, definitely.
Miriam would be Yangish, Fund/Planned/Power/Eudaimonia.
Santiago; Police/Planned/Power/Thought ctrl.
Pirates are a pretty tough call IMHO. Maybe Demo/Free/Power/Eudaimonia. They are pirates, so maybe Wealth...
__________________
Cake and grief counseling will be available at the conclusion of the test. Thank you for helping us help you help us all!
Kassiopeia is offline  
Old July 25, 2001, 19:01   #6
Fitz
King
 
Fitz's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: & Anarchist
Posts: 1,689
Yay, I get to make a list:

Gaians: Fundamentalist/Green/Knowlege/Eudiamonic
Hive: Police State/Planned/Power/Thought Control
Believers: Fundamentalist/Planned/Power/Thought Control
Morganites: Democratic/Free Market/Wealth/Eudiamonic
University: Democratic/Planned/Knowledge/Cybernetic
Spartans: Police State/Planned/Power/Thought Control
Peacekeepers: Democratic/Free Market/Knowledge/Eudiamonic

Cult: Fundamentalist/Green/Power/Though Control
Cyborgs: Democratic/Planned/Knowledge/Cybernetic
Pirates: Democratic/Free Market/Power/
Drones: Democratic/Planned/Power/Eudiamonic
Angels: Democratic/Free Market/Knowledge/Cybernetic
Usurpers: Police State/Planned/Power/Thought Control
Caretakers: Fundamentalist/Planned/Power/Cybernetic



Now if you want to go for wierd/opposite settings: (a few favorites)

Hive in Eudiamonic
Believers in Wealth/Cybernetic
Morganites in Police State/Thought Control is sort of appropirate in a way. Especially Thought Control through advertising.
University in Thought Control
Peacekeepers in Fundamentalist/Thought Control

Cult in Planned is appropirate. Remember they pollute a fair amount according to their description.
Cyborgs in Free Market/Wealth or Though Control
Drones in Police State/Free Market/Power/Thought Control is one of my Favorites. Everything they hate in one go (except maybe power).
Angels in Police State/Thought Control

On a side note, I find it funny that the drones can use planned. I would have thought industrial wage slaving would be their nemesis. Although I understand that if you think of them as pro-union industrial workers they would hate Green and love Planned.
Fitz is offline  
Old July 25, 2001, 19:54   #7
Avenoct
Prince
 
Avenoct's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 777
I think of the peacekeepers as essentially a fundamentalist group. They are so 'charter-thumping' and use that as a cover to hide their desire to convert everyone to their beliefs. Of all the factions, they seem the most righteous. Miriam is righteous, but seems to understand she's alone. Lal seems to see the world as misunderstanding the obvious truths of secular humanism. I like Yangs position (seemingly). He doesn't really care about anything but the Hive.

-Smack
__________________
Visit Aldebaran:Aldebaranweb
Avenoct is offline  
Old July 25, 2001, 20:05   #8
Kirnwaffen
Warlord
 
Kirnwaffen's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 281
I still say Lal would go green b/c of all of the tech and facility blurbs. Many of them talk about the ecology of Planet and foolishly disrupting it and so on and so forth...
__________________
"Beauty is not in the face...Beauty is a light in the heart." - Kahlil Gibran
"The greatest happiness of life is the conviction that we are loved; loved for ourselves, or rather, loved in spite of ourselves" - Victor Hugo
"It is noble to be good; it is still nobler to teach others to be good -- and less trouble." - Mark Twain
Kirnwaffen is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 17:01   #9
Nadexander
Warlord
 
Nadexander's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Saratoga, California
Posts: 122
Quote:
Originally posted by death_head
Lal is the opposite of Yang and Sparta, thus, he is a capitalist, thus, he would choose wealth...damn Arab oil shieks (no offense to any Arabs)
He's Indian. Listen carefully to the inflection of his 'V's as 'W'
(And it says so in his faction profile.. )

No offense taken

Last edited by Nadexander; July 26, 2001 at 17:09.
Nadexander is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 17:12   #10
EtheMind
Warlord
 
EtheMind's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 143
I think cyborgs work very well with Free Market considering they have enough efficiency even without Green. And I don't think their cybernetic ideology has much enthusiasm towards Ecological thinking or mindworm preservation.

I think Drone ideology is close to socialism we know. Perhaps a bit more genuine and working class centered. All socialisms did pervert into Dictatorships with even worst class societies than in the West, things got better here(!)...and now they're getting worst...
__________________
"What a piece of work is a man! How noble in reason! How infinite in faculty! In form and moving how express and admirable! In action how like an angel! In apprehension how like a God! The beauty of the world! The paragon of animals!" - Shakespeare
EtheMind is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 17:33   #11
Kassiopeia
Alpha Centauri Democracy GameGalCiv Apolyton EmpireApolyton Storywriters' GuildCivilization II Democracy GameApolytoners Hall of FameACDG3 Spartans
Emperor
 
Kassiopeia's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Aperture Science Enrichment Center
Posts: 8,638
Quote:
Originally posted by Nadexander


He's Indian. Listen carefully to the inflection of his 'V's as 'W'
(And it says so in his faction profile.. )
"Lal" means love or something else cuddly in Hindi, which is talked just about only in India.
__________________
Cake and grief counseling will be available at the conclusion of the test. Thank you for helping us help you help us all!
Kassiopeia is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 18:51   #12
Black Sunrise
Prince
 
Black Sunrise's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Buffalo, New York, USA
Posts: 634
We don't have to wonder if Lal would go AI.
He went cybernetic.
Check through the soundfiles.
Tech52:
"I think, and my thoughts cross the barrier, into the synapses of the machine, just as the good doctor intended; but what I cannot shake, and what hints at things to come, is that throughts cross back. In my dreams, the sensibility of the machine invades the perifery of my conciousness: Dark, rigid, cold, alien. Evolution is at work here, but just what is evolving remains to be seen."
Comissioner Provin Lal, Man and Machine.


Indra
Black Sunrise is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 20:44   #13
Tenchusatsu
Warlord
 
Local Time: 11:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Portland, OR (rolling and very rainy)
Posts: 230
Quote:
Originally posted by Smack
I think of the peacekeepers as essentially a fundamentalist group. They are so 'charter-thumping' and use that as a cover to hide their desire to convert everyone to their beliefs. Of all the factions, they seem the most righteous. Miriam is righteous, but seems to understand she's alone. Lal seems to see the world as misunderstanding the obvious truths of secular humanism. I like Yangs position (seemingly). He doesn't really care about anything but the Hive.

-Smack
Well, I really don't see Lal the same way you do. Excluding how the AI seems to play Lal like the backstabber he isn't (or shouldn't be, in my opinion), I think Lal is most concerned about preserving and advancing the cause of inalienable human rights. Sure, he has a desire to convert all of Planet over to his side, but it seems people are indeed listening to him, or else he wouldn't be getting 50% more Council votes than the other factions.

So Lal is definitely one who prefers Democratic over anything else. He's probably flexible with any choice of SE Economics, depending on which political party within his faction has the majority at the time (Republican, Democrat, or Green ). He'll also be rather flexible with SE Values, though I can't imagine him staying in Power for a very long period of time. Probably only to carry out UN-style "peacekeeping" missions, and only for a short while.

As for Future Society, I can definitely see him preferring Eudamonia over anything else. (To Black Sunrise) We know Lal experienced what it's like to go cybernetic, but that doesn't mean he prefers to go that route en force. Indeed, by the time of Future Societies, every faction will have researched and implemented technologies like Mind/Machine Interface and Sentient Computers (sp?), even those who have issues with them. Heck, I'll bet even Miriam would not hesitate to use these techs, if only as a means to a contradictory end.
Tenchusatsu is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 05:33   #14
EtheMind
Warlord
 
EtheMind's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 143
I think the Lal we know from 'Journey to Alpha Centauri' or Michael Ely's Centauri Dawn is not the same we face in via commlink diplomacy. Though Centauri Dawn is somewhat in contradiction with the original 'Journey to Alpha Centauri', but nothing that major. In game, Lal is a genuine and true backstabber, as said.

Miriam commlink alter ego is also interesting. In Journey to Alpha Centauri Miriam was one the two becoming faction leaders that were against the idea of sharing the landing pods between the officers. And Miriam seemed also very peaceful, empathic and understanding...nothing like fundamentalist we see in the game. I guess she just lost it during the landing.
__________________
"What a piece of work is a man! How noble in reason! How infinite in faculty! In form and moving how express and admirable! In action how like an angel! In apprehension how like a God! The beauty of the world! The paragon of animals!" - Shakespeare
EtheMind is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 09:32   #15
bobyk464
Chieftain
 
bobyk464's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 53
Quote:
I think of the peacekeepers as essentially a fundamentalist group. They are so 'charter-thumping' and use that as a cover to hide their desire to convert everyone to their beliefs. Of all the factions, they seem the most righteous. Miriam is righteous, but seems to understand she's alone. Lal seems to see the world as misunderstanding the obvious truths of secular humanism.
Well said. I think the real UN and the US Democratic party both fall into this trap.

As far as the game goes, seems like it's not possible for the AI to effectively play the Peacekeeper faction in the spirit in which it was intended.

And what to say about Deidre? I'm too young to know firsthand, but everything I've seen, read, and heard about tells me that hippies were fundamentalists of this type, too.

And on the lighter side - what about those Pirates? If we think of them as happy-go-lucky swashbuckling rogue privateers, then there's no organized government. You've got Frontier and Wealth. Future society? Who cares about the future? We're having too good of a time now... But the truth is rarely so glamorous - more realistically, they'd be run like a brutal organized crime syndicate. But I like to think Sven and his followers are better than that.
bobyk464 is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 14:30   #16
Tenchusatsu
Warlord
 
Local Time: 11:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Portland, OR (rolling and very rainy)
Posts: 230
Quote:
Originally posted by bobyk464

And on the lighter side - what about those Pirates? If we think of them as happy-go-lucky swashbuckling rogue privateers, then there's no organized government. You've got Frontier and Wealth. Future society? Who cares about the future? We're having too good of a time now... But the truth is rarely so glamorous - more realistically, they'd be run like a brutal organized crime syndicate. But I like to think Sven and his followers are better than that.
Pirates and Wealth? The idea of SE Wealth is to generate your own, not take that of others. So the Pirates would necessarily go for SE Power. As for government, I guess Frontier would make sense, given that there is no centralized government like you said. Economics? Either Simple or Free Market.
Tenchusatsu is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 14:40   #17
bobyk464
Chieftain
 
bobyk464's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 53
Good point.
bobyk464 is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 14:45   #18
Nadexander
Warlord
 
Nadexander's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Saratoga, California
Posts: 122
Re: Faction Ideology in Social Engineering
Quote:
Originally posted by Alynzia

In short, hippies, the lot of them! Not too sure about the future society choice, because cybernetic gives the +2 Planet rating. Would Deirdre hand over her administration to computers so she could spend more time dancing naked through the trees?
I think this has been mentioned before on the boards but it seems like it would more apropriate if cybernetic had the +2 Industry (precision and efficiency of cyborgs allow for more effective production) and eudimonia had the +2 planet (enlightened humans at peace with the universe are more likely to commune with nature). I think this a great change because it helps with game balance and also makes the roleplaying aspect more interesting.
In this light i think i can totally see eudimoniac gaians spending all day frolicking naked in the trees Now I can see where that +2 to population growth comes from.

Quote:
This of course has no relevance to the game, unless you really like to get into character...
Of course! Thats the best part. Whats the point of playing Yang if you cant nerve staple captured bases
Nadexander is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 16:56   #19
EtheMind
Warlord
 
EtheMind's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 143
Quote:
As far as the game goes, seems like it's not possible for the AI to effectively play the Peacekeeper
Pacifist settings might have helped. But if you want to conduct UN style Peacekeeping you can't really be a pacifist in the true meaning of the word. But it might have suited better than the Erratic, in sake of realism. In the end UN Peacekeepers are suppose to be something more than an ordinary faction, something which they aren't.

I usually choose the faction's agenda in SE, simply because what's the point of playing a role of idealist, if you don't play according to ideals. However, in most cases the best choice is to choose the faction's agenda even from the perspective of political realities. And most of the SE choices which would seem to support faction's original intentions seem to support the overall strategy. There's little point of playing Gaian's with Police State or Yang with Free Market. You need to make most of those faction bonuses, whatever they are.
__________________
"What a piece of work is a man! How noble in reason! How infinite in faculty! In form and moving how express and admirable! In action how like an angel! In apprehension how like a God! The beauty of the world! The paragon of animals!" - Shakespeare
EtheMind is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 21:33   #20
Alinestra Covelia
ACDG The Human HiveRise of Nations Multiplayer
Queen
 
Alinestra Covelia's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,848
I don't know why, but I always thought of Yang eventually aiming for a Eudaimonaic society at the end - his present state of self-denial and state-empowerment is akin to the Marxist ideal of Communist leaders.

In other words, the state control, like the idea of a "Communist leader" (essentially a self contradiction) is only an initial and temporary arrangement - the end result is one that can be directly achieved only after certain ideologies have been shed.

I got that impression of Yang - namely, that he practised the same asceticisms that he imposed on his people, purely so that when they had been sufficiently reformed, the state and human endeavor would be synonymous.
__________________
"lol internet" ~ AAHZ
Alinestra Covelia is offline  
Old July 28, 2001, 02:39   #21
korn469
Emperor
 
korn469's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In the army
Posts: 3,375
as for the spartans i think they would go

police state
free market
power (in war) knowledge (in peace)
then probably cyber

with the extra starting police stats and with a police state/fm/kno/cyber you have a faction that is really good at research and can still fight
korn469 is offline  
Old July 28, 2001, 10:42   #22
EtheMind
Warlord
 
EtheMind's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 143
Quote:
I don't know why, but I always thought of Yang eventually aiming for a Eudaimonaic society at the end - his present state of self-denial and state-empowerment is akin to the Marxist ideal of Communist leaders.
Yang's high security police state with implanted Big Brother attitude is that far from communism. And the idea from trespassing into communism by using party dictatorship is the idea by V.I. Lenin.

Yang however practised full-blown totalitarian system in which The State, not the People, not All Workers of the World served as the final purpose. In fact Yang was an aristocrat who believed into elite individuals rather than masses. The very thing communism fought against. Considering the quotes of Yang about Drones it's easy to recognize the pity, fear and untrust he felt towards lower class.

The basic definition of totalitarian system is "The State is self serving purpose of existance, the absolute value behind all actions and motives". When looking back into this definition nothing falls better into category than Hive.

I say he goes for Thought Control.
__________________
"What a piece of work is a man! How noble in reason! How infinite in faculty! In form and moving how express and admirable! In action how like an angel! In apprehension how like a God! The beauty of the world! The paragon of animals!" - Shakespeare
EtheMind is offline  
Old July 28, 2001, 22:00   #23
warmachine
Settler
 
warmachine's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Reading, England
Posts: 28
Quote:
I think of the peacekeepers as essentially a fundamentalist group. They are so 'charter-thumping' and use that as a cover to hide their desire to convert everyone to their beliefs.
All the factions are guilty of advocating their own ideology. This doesn't make them fundamentalist. After all, the game is about 7 leaders who shatter their mission because they can't agree.

Lal's ideology is to convince different cultures to respect each other and to work in harmony. That's why the Peacekeepers get +2 population limit. He's also from a country composed of different cultures that are trying not to fight each other. Hence, the PKs avoid excessive police or monocultures - Democratic.

His dismay during Mind/Machine Interface suggests he favours individual over corporate power. The exploits of Free Market is right out. His advocation during Centauri Preserve and Centauri Psi suggests a planet friendly economy, though mostly to prevent Mind Worm attacks - Green.

He advocates free information and self-teaching, hence his opening speech and libraries as Recreation Commons - Knowledge.

Future society is less obvious, though clearly not Thought Control. Considering the society encourages Talents - Eudaimonic
__________________
Matthew Greet

You're just jealous because the voices are only talking to me.
warmachine is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:48.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team