Thread Tools
Old July 26, 2001, 00:52   #1
connorkimbro
Emperor
 
connorkimbro's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seoul Korea
Posts: 4,344
I hope there's NOT a Civ3 Expansion pack
Maybe I'm alone in this. . but i sure hope that there isn't one. For the following reason. .

Some games, it's GOOD to have an expansion pack. Something like the Sims. . where it's a simulation, you're just increasing the variety of things you can work with. Mission based games. . extra missions are essential to replay value. Or. . if the game just isn't good enough the first time around . .

Hopefully, firaxis gets everything right the first time around, and an expansion pack isn't needed. It seems to me the rational of saying. . "well, we'll just save those ideas for an expansion pack" allows you to be a bit lazier on making the game. i hope that does NOT happen.

Ok, so why did Civ2 get expansion packs? they came with increased scenario editing tools, and scenarios. Hopefully the scenario editing tools that are released with the game are adequate, and if they're not, SURELY i hope you don't have to pay extra to get decent ones. And scenarios, i've always, thought, should be one of those types of things that you can download for free off the internet. . you shouldn't have to buy them . .

If an idea is good enough for civ3, put it in the original game. . don't wait to put it in an expansion pack. Nobody likes buying a game in installments.

Ok, well SMAC had an expansion pack. . big deal. SMAC wasn't as good of a game for a few reasons, that i don't need to get into here really. But it needed the expansion packs. It wasn't as good as civ2, and hopefully civ3 will blow it out of the water. anyway. . that's enough for now. .

anyone else on the same page as me, or am i alone in this?. .
__________________
-connorkimbro
"We're losing the war on AIDS. And drugs. And poverty. And terror. But we sure took it to those Nazis. Man, those were the days."

-theonion.com
connorkimbro is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 01:07   #2
yin26
inmate
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Born Again Optimist
 
yin26's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: This space reserved for Darkstar.
Posts: 5,667
Well, we KNOW it will have an x-pack. The question is, will it be one of those "Now you can buy the game as it SHOULD have been shipped" kind of things or will it truly add to the Civ 3 game in a significant way? The Net and X-packs. Our best friends. Our worst enemies.

I didn't buy the SMAC x-pack, for example. You say it needed it. I guess so. That's why I stopped playing. Any game that NEEDS an x-pack won't see my money for it.

So I agree with you. Our money for an x-pack should be earned from a great Civ3 experience. Nothing less. Where I am a bit more flexible is with the idea that Civ3 would not benefit from an x-pack. No matter how great Civ 3 ends up being, you can always do more cool stuff that would be worth paying some more money for. A mass of new scenarios, maps, civs, music, art, AI routines, etc. could be worth the cash if the underlying game it's built on is worth it to begin with.
__________________
I've been on these boards for a long time and I still don't know what to think when it comes to you -- FrantzX, December 21, 2001

"Yin": Your friendly, neighborhood negative cosmic force.
yin26 is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 01:11   #3
Warm Beer
Warlord
 
Warm Beer's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: The Evergreen State
Posts: 134
I see what you mean... but culturally specific units and animated leaders leaves the door wide open for an expansion. After all, look at all of the controversy over what civs should be in the game... If only 16 are in, then my crystal ball says, "look for a expansion pack to plug in all the other desired civs" (a-la Alien-Crossfire?).

Of course this is entirely based on conjecture...
__________________
"When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk." -Tuco Benedicto Juan Ramirez
"I hate my hat, I hate my clubs, I hate my life" -Marcia
"I think it would be a good idea."
- Mahatma Ghandi, when asked what he thought of Western civilization
Warm Beer is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 01:22   #4
connorkimbro
Emperor
 
connorkimbro's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seoul Korea
Posts: 4,344
yin. . good points you brought up. . i generally agree with you i guess. . my only fear is that they'll get lazy with the actual game with the idea that "we'll just add that later" that should definately NOT happen. .

Quote:
I see what you mean... but culturally specific units and animated leaders leaves the door wide open for an expansion. After all, look at all of the controversy over what civs should be in the game... If only 16 are in, then my crystal ball says, "look for a expansion pack to plug in all the other desired civs" (a-la Alien-Crossfire?).
Well it depends on how it's done i guess. One of the reasons i didn't like SMAC as much was the whole story, along with very characterized factions. You always knew how factions would react, and if you randomized, it didn't fit with the story. This severly limited replay value, IMO.
There obviously isn't going to be a story, but depending on how different they make each civ. . (to tell you the truth, even unique units makes me a bit nervous) . . then either they'll need to plug in extra civs, because they killed the replay value, or they won't, because they didn't kill the replay value.

Replay value is a huge thing for me, especially for civ. I enjoyed smac the first game i played, but if i shell out 50$ for a game, i want to enjoy it for years, IE civ2. I STILL play civ2.
I still want to be playing civ3 years from now. If the GAME is done right, then an expansion pack won't be necessary, IMO.
__________________
-connorkimbro
"We're losing the war on AIDS. And drugs. And poverty. And terror. But we sure took it to those Nazis. Man, those were the days."

-theonion.com
connorkimbro is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 01:30   #5
connorkimbro
Emperor
 
connorkimbro's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seoul Korea
Posts: 4,344
summed up nicely..
I guess basically what i'm trying to say is. .

If an expansion would increase gameplay, then why wasn't the original game good enough?

If it wouldn't increase gameplay, why buy the expansion?
__________________
-connorkimbro
"We're losing the war on AIDS. And drugs. And poverty. And terror. But we sure took it to those Nazis. Man, those were the days."

-theonion.com
connorkimbro is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 01:38   #6
yin26
inmate
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Born Again Optimist
 
yin26's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: This space reserved for Darkstar.
Posts: 5,667
Quote:
If an expansion would increase gameplay, then why wasn't the original game good enough?
ANSWER (pick one or mix and match)

Lack of: Time, money, ability...
Use of: Business sense...(assuming the base game is solid to begin with, otherwise please stick with the 'Lack of...' section)

Quote:
If it wouldn't increase gameplay, why buy the expansion?
I consider this more of a rhetorical question.
__________________
I've been on these boards for a long time and I still don't know what to think when it comes to you -- FrantzX, December 21, 2001

"Yin": Your friendly, neighborhood negative cosmic force.
yin26 is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 02:46   #7
Alex 14
Prince
 
Alex 14's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Asia Pacific
Posts: 611
Re: summed up nicely..
Quote:
Originally posted by connorkimbro
I guess basically what i'm trying to say is. .

If an expansion would increase gameplay, then why wasn't the original game good enough?

If it wouldn't increase gameplay, why buy the expansion?
I would like an expansion like aoe 2: aok, it should just have new civs, advisers, units, scenarios ect.
__________________
Alex
Alex 14 is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 04:53   #8
H Tower
Civilization II Democracy Game: ExodusScenario League / Civ2-CreationCivilization II Democracy Game: Red FrontCivilization II Democracy GameNationStates
 
H Tower's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,135
maybe an expansion pack could fix things we brought up in the forums too late for firaxis to put in the first shippment of the game. and if they can't think up new stuff to put into the game with only a reasonable amount of reprogramming, they shouldn't even be making the game. Civ2's greatest strong points are replayability and ability to be modified.
H Tower is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 05:19   #9
Juggler
Prince
 
Juggler's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: of nothing
Posts: 361
You're wright on that issue, the expansion pack will probably make the game even better, so I'm for the expansion as long as it brings new ideas (not like HL: Blue Sh(f)it) and comes with a reasonable price.
Juggler is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 05:53   #10
Urban Ranger
NationStatesApolyton Storywriters' GuildNever Ending Stories
Deity
 
Urban Ranger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
Posts: 14,606
Well, I could think of features are nice to have, but may not appeal to a wide range of players. In other words, optional features. Now, the good thing of having an expansion pack is it saves time and money, both for the players and the publishers.

For example, in Civ 3 Firaxis can concentrate on making the core features work instead of spreading themselves thin. This means they can sell the game cheaper, at $40 or even $35 instead of $50, and still turn a profit. The players benefits from the ability to get a nice game at a reasonable price, a game with features that work instead of one with lots of bugs.

I think Firaxis will have to put in a very usable editor to ensure the logevity of Civ 3, but they could always package other stuff like different sets of graphics for various civs, scenarios, modpacks, etc.

Regarding scenarios and modpacks, think of it like Linux. You can download it for free, or you can buy a distro.
__________________
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
Urban Ranger is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 07:21   #11
campmajor!
Prince
 
campmajor!'s Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Zoetermeer, The Netherlands
Posts: 306
Re: summed up nicely..
Quote:
Originally posted by connorkimbro
I guess basically what i'm trying to say is. .

If an expansion would increase gameplay, then why wasn't the original game good enough?

If it wouldn't increase gameplay, why buy the expansion?
Well, things aren't just Black and White.
There is also grey.

Meaning: civ3 can be a good and solid game, but it still can be nice to make lots of different advisors/civs/etc for people who want something extra. This can be put in an expansion pack.
campmajor! is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 09:15   #12
Seeker
Emperor
 
Seeker's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Yongsan-Gu, Seoul
Posts: 3,647
I want an expansion pack or two...I like (good) scenarios and with the improved graphics, new leader animations ect are only going to be available through expansions.

Maybe the expansion will be a 'dedicated' scenario editor?
__________________
"Wait a minute..this isn''t FAUX dive, it's just a DIVE!"
"...Mangy dog staggering about, looking vainly for a place to die."
"sauna stories? There are no 'sauna stories'.. I mean.. sauna is sauna. You do by the laws of sauna." -P.
Seeker is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 09:37   #13
Grumbold
Emperor
 
Grumbold's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,732
I'd be up for an X-pack that expanded functionality. New civs, maps and scenarios should be freely downloadable from the official website instead. One new civ per month and one new scenario per quarter shouldn't strain their resources if the continued sales of Civ III warrant the outlay. If they don't, there's no demand for an X-pack either.
__________________
To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection. H.Poincare
Grumbold is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 10:11   #14
Colon™
Emperor
 
Colon™'s Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Antwerp, Colon's Chocolate Canard Country
Posts: 6,511
An expansion pack isn’t necessarily bad as long they pull off such a scam as Microprose’s. ToT would have been a worthy expansion pack (it was a full game) but MGE and the scenario packs weren’t.
A civ3 expansion pack including new civs would be acceptable provided that the civs are truly distinct from each other (graphics, units, tech trees etc) and require some work to put together (à la SMAC) or if you include completely new environments, game concepts and graphics. (a là ToT)

An expansion pack solely offering new scenarios and maps is nonsense. Unless they make it difficult to create them yourself they better leave that to the gamers because it’s obvious they’re way more adept at it.
__________________
DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
Colon™ is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 10:25   #15
Sabre2th
King
 
Sabre2th's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,691
Quote:
Unless they make it difficult to create them yourself
Don't give them any ideas.
Sabre2th is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 10:40   #16
Colon™
Emperor
 
Colon™'s Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Antwerp, Colon's Chocolate Canard Country
Posts: 6,511
Well, I don't think it would have to happen on purpose, the game will be more complex than civ2 and the graphics more advanced which makes it harder to create your own graphics and therefore scens and mods. You already had it in SMAC, I didn't saw any new units (since they were semi-3D) or terrains and I believe it was hard to make scens in CTP as well.

Now I think of it, maybe it's a good thing that civ3 doesn't have very advanced graphics (3D stuff and all) because that would make it impossible for the abundant majority gamers to make their own graphics.
__________________
DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
Colon™ is offline  
Old July 26, 2001, 10:53   #17
Grumbold
Emperor
 
Grumbold's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,732
A Firaxian confirmed that there would be support for unanimated custom units to make life easier for the modders.
__________________
To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection. H.Poincare
Grumbold is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 04:39   #18
MarkG
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Apolyton CS Co-Founder
 
MarkG's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Macedonia, Greece
Posts: 24,480
civ2 expansions kept the civ genre alive for years....
__________________
Co-Founder, Apolyton Civilization Site
Co-Owner/Webmaster, Top40-Charts.com | CTO, Apogee Information Systems
giannopoulos.info: my non-mobile non-photo news & articles blog
MarkG is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 10:48   #19
Recurve
Chieftain
 
Recurve's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The Black Country
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally posted by MarkG
civ2 expansions kept the civ genre alive for years....
I disagree, Civ2 itself has kept the civ genre alive for years, the expansions haven't really added much to the game (TOT is great, but it's just Civ2 with juiced-up graphics and the multiplayer features that were lacking).

All I can say is, bring on Civ3!
__________________
Art is a science having more than seven variables.
Recurve is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 10:50   #20
Recurve
Chieftain
 
Recurve's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The Black Country
Posts: 83
Firaxis aren't actually developing Civ3, they're just having a laugh at our expense!
__________________
Art is a science having more than seven variables.
Recurve is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 11:58   #21
Colon™
Emperor
 
Colon™'s Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Antwerp, Colon's Chocolate Canard Country
Posts: 6,511
Markos, there only two things that the packs really added to civ2, which were the scen editor and the MP feature and the latter arguably should have been in the original version in the first place. (maybe they weren't technically ready, I don't know)
They didn't need to release 2 scen packs, MGE (Was that released in a pack? Can't remember) and a full charge ToT for that, did they?

I suppose it isn't a problem when you have enough cash to spend but my budget is somewhat tighter than that.
__________________
DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
Colon™ is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 12:02   #22
MarkG
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Apolyton CS Co-Founder
 
MarkG's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Macedonia, Greece
Posts: 24,480
their value in keeping civ2 alive was not so much in their additions, but in introducing the game to new people and "reminding" the market of the existance of civ2.....
__________________
Co-Founder, Apolyton Civilization Site
Co-Owner/Webmaster, Top40-Charts.com | CTO, Apogee Information Systems
giannopoulos.info: my non-mobile non-photo news & articles blog
MarkG is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 12:13   #23
Colon™
Emperor
 
Colon™'s Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Antwerp, Colon's Chocolate Canard Country
Posts: 6,511
You mean that Microprose was able to make more bucks out of it?

No, seriously, I think they could have accomplished that well enough by re-releasing with some slick promotion. That stuff even works with people who already have the game in question, I’ve always been tempted to repurchase SC2000 every time I saw it in the store.

Besides, I’m not saying they shouldn’t have released anything at all, they could have released the scen packs with the MP pack in one expansion pack, or just held all up until ToT.

BTW, can I puh-lease get a "President of the Official Apolyton Non-Aligned Civers Club" title?
__________________
DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
Colon™ is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 13:46   #24
Imran Siddiqui
staff
Apolytoners Hall of FameAge of Nations TeamPolyCast Team
 
Imran Siddiqui's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: on the corner of Peachtree and Peachtree
Posts: 30,698
I think an expansion pack would be good, if it added MORE unique Civs.

I am thinking, right now, of a Civ3 expansion pack including the Arabs, the Japanese, the Incas, etc... That would be really nice.
__________________
“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Imran Siddiqui is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 13:50   #25
Sabre2th
King
 
Sabre2th's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,691
A pack that simply finishes an unfinished game would be very, very bad, but if they made a pack with extra civs, music, advisor movies, or whatever, I would definately buy it.
Sabre2th is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 13:52   #26
Sabre2th
King
 
Sabre2th's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,691
Quote:
Originally posted by Colon
BTW, can I puh-lease get a "President of the Official Apolyton Non-Aligned Civers Club" title?
If you do this, aren't you just aligned with a new group?
Sabre2th is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 14:04   #27
down th' pub
Warlord
 
Local Time: 11:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chasin' Shadows in the Rain
Posts: 121
Good point, isn't that what Non-aligned would mean...
__________________
"Don't know exactly where I am"
down th' pub is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 16:13   #28
DarkCloud
staff
NationStatesAlpha Centauri Democracy GameCivilization II Democracy GameInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamSpanish CiversCiv4 InterSite DG: Apolyton TeamPolyCast TeamApolyton Storywriters' GuildAge of Nations TeamApolytoners Hall of Fame
 
DarkCloud's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Deity of Lists
Posts: 11,873
If Civ III does not include a scenario editor and a map editor- I will probably buy the expansion pack if the game is good enough without it... I love civ, but I will then hold a grudge against Sid Meier for beign a ripoff and will no longer follow him blindly.

SMAC's expansion pack was necesasry to have fun with the game if you didn't know how to edit the text files... and even then the Faction Editor frequently crashed.
__________________
-->Visit CGN!
-->"Production! More Production! Production creates Wealth! Production creates more Jobs!"-Wendell Willkie -1944
DarkCloud is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 16:32   #29
One More Turn!
Chieftain
 
One More Turn!'s Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
I think an expansion pack would be good, if it added MORE unique Civs.

I am thinking, right now, of a Civ3 expansion pack including the Arabs, the Japanese, the Incas, etc... That would be really nice.
I agree, this would be a worthwhile expansion pack - assuming that the Civs are truly unique. Otherwise some enterprising Apolytoner could just create a mod with appropriate civ names, units, etc to add just about any civ into the mix.

I also believe that an expansion pack should not be a bug fix, but should add something new to the gameplay. Although hopefully not something that should have been there from the beginning.
__________________
"Pessimism: Every dark cloud has a silver lining, but lightning kills hundreds of people each year who are trying to find it." - demotivational poster

"It's not rocket scientry, you know." -anonymous co-worker
One More Turn! is offline  
Old July 27, 2001, 16:39   #30
Sabre2th
King
 
Sabre2th's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,691
Quote:
Originally posted by DarkCloud
If Civ III does not include a scenario editor and a map editor
It's been said quite often that it will. Firaxis has confirmed this.
Sabre2th is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team