Thread Tools
Old August 11, 2001, 12:55   #1
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
Better Babylonian bowmen Date? Source?
Will someone please tell me exactly what period Firaxis is referring to for superior babylonian bowmen? and if there are any sources to this effect?

TIA

Lord of the Mark
lord of the mark is offline  
Old August 11, 2001, 13:33   #2
DarkCloud
staff
NationStatesAlpha Centauri Democracy GameCivilization II Democracy GameInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamSpanish CiversCiv4 InterSite DG: Apolyton TeamPolyCast TeamApolyton Storywriters' GuildAge of Nations TeamApolytoners Hall of Fame
 
DarkCloud's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Deity of Lists
Posts: 11,873
Wait. So this means the special units come at a certain date and NOT when a certain advance is discovered?
__________________
-->Visit CGN!
-->"Production! More Production! Production creates Wealth! Production creates more Jobs!"-Wendell Willkie -1944
DarkCloud is offline  
Old August 11, 2001, 13:38   #3
Warm Beer
Warlord
 
Warm Beer's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: The Evergreen State
Posts: 134
It looked like the Babylonian bowman will take the place of the regular bowman, at least as far as the Babylonians go.
I suppose that means when the advance that allows bowmen is discovered, the Babylonian bowmen will make thier debut... Probably "Ancient Times"..
__________________
"When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk." -Tuco Benedicto Juan Ramirez
"I hate my hat, I hate my clubs, I hate my life" -Marcia
"I think it would be a good idea."
- Mahatma Ghandi, when asked what he thought of Western civilization
Warm Beer is offline  
Old August 11, 2001, 13:39   #4
tniem
King
 
Local Time: 07:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Hope College
Posts: 2,232
Quote:
Originally posted by DarkCloud
Wait. So this means the special units come at a certain date and NOT when a certain advance is discovered?
No, it is just that LOTM does not believe that the Babylonians had superior bowmen. He thinks that Firaxis is making it all up.

I must admit I really had never heard of their great bowmen, but I would have to believe that Firaxis would have done their homework.
tniem is offline  
Old August 11, 2001, 13:41   #5
Buck Birdseed
Emperor
 
Buck Birdseed's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Khoon Ki Pyasi Dayan (1988)
Posts: 3,951
http://www.student.utwente.nl/campus...nt_composites/

According to this article the Composite Bow was originally an Assyrian invention at the latest from about 1200 B.C. or so, which would be consistent with their Babylonian nature- the Assyrians held Babylon during the time period in question.
__________________
Världsstad - Dom lokala genrenas vän
Mick102, 102,3 Umeå, Måndagar 20-21
Buck Birdseed is offline  
Old August 11, 2001, 13:46   #6
Warm Beer
Warlord
 
Warm Beer's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: The Evergreen State
Posts: 134
D'OH
Quote:
Originally posted by tniem


No, it is just that LOTM does not believe that the Babylonians had superior bowmen. He thinks that Firaxis is making it all up.
Geez I feel like a dope... my excuse is i haven't had enought coffee this morning...

and tnx for the info Snapecase... learning something everyday on this site.
__________________
"When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk." -Tuco Benedicto Juan Ramirez
"I hate my hat, I hate my clubs, I hate my life" -Marcia
"I think it would be a good idea."
- Mahatma Ghandi, when asked what he thought of Western civilization
Warm Beer is offline  
Old August 11, 2001, 14:02   #7
tniem
King
 
Local Time: 07:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Hope College
Posts: 2,232
Decided to do some research here is what I found:

From http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Cave.../govrmil.html:

Quote:
Babylon made extensive use of cavalry, especially mounted bowmen.

From http://www.curtin.edu.au/curtin/dept...andal.html#ass

Quote:
Assyrian bowmen had leather boots with tongues protecting the top and came to the lower part of the calf.and were fastened with thongs in front

From Jerimiah 4:29:

Quote:
flee for the noise of the horsemen and bowmen

From http://www.timsvault.com/mac_cheats/aoe.txt

Quote:
Little is known of the Babylonian military from either the Old or New Empires, although Hammurabi's army of the Old Empire may have made important use of chariots when these were first coming into use.

The New Empire armies probably copied much from the Assyrians. This would suggest that Babylonians made extensive use of cavaly, especially mounted bowmen.

It appears like historians are till unsure of what the Babylonians possessed that made them so great. However, I did find tons of pictures from the Assyrians that showed off their archers. One of which from http://www.worldhistory1a.homestead.com/PERSIA.html is below.
Attached Thumbnails:
Click image for larger version

Name:	assyrian_war_scene.gif
Views:	129
Size:	88.8 KB
ID:	1733  
tniem is offline  
Old August 14, 2001, 23:58   #8
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
Quote:
Originally posted by Snapcase
http://www.student.utwente.nl/campus...nt_composites/

According to this article the Composite Bow was originally an Assyrian invention at the latest from about 1200 B.C. or so, which would be consistent with their Babylonian nature- the Assyrians held Babylon during the time period in question.

Its not clear from the article that the Assyrian invention of the composite bow is widely accepted - the article seems to be arguing against the position that the 1200 bc bow found in egypt is actually egyptian. the author of the article may be right - that is not for me to judge. In any case this argues for babylonian superiority in bowmen in 1200 BC, towards the end of the bronze age. Does this seem consistent with the appearance of bowmen?

LOTM
lord of the mark is offline  
Old August 15, 2001, 00:03   #9
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
Quote:
Originally posted by tniem
Decided to do some research here is what I found:




From http://www.timsvault.com/mac_cheats/aoe.txt




It appears like historians are till unsure of what the Babylonians possessed that made them so great. However, I did find tons of pictures from the Assyrians that showed off their archers. One of which from http://www.worldhistory1a.homestead.com/PERSIA.html is below.

Age of Empires, whatever one thinks of the game, DOES have a very nice set of historical discussions in its manual. their discussion of the evolution of the sword is terrific. I am still a little, how shall we say, taken aback that AOE is being used as a historical SOURCE. I take it you're not one of those who says "its only a game"

And thanks of course for the other sources.

LOTM
lord of the mark is offline  
Old August 15, 2001, 03:00   #10
tniem
King
 
Local Time: 07:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Hope College
Posts: 2,232
Quote:
Originally posted by lord of the mark

Age of Empires, whatever one thinks of the game, DOES have a very nice set of historical discussions in its manual. their discussion of the evolution of the sword is terrific. I am still a little, how shall we say, taken aback that AOE is being used as a historical SOURCE. I take it you're not one of those who says "its only a game"
It actually was the best information/read that I could find. I would hope that the people who did AOE have done their work just like the Firaxis team has. I of course would never have used that source if this discussion was in any way important enough to factor into the game. After all Firaxis has already decided, I just wanted to give everyone here some prespective.

Quote:
And thanks of course for the other sources.
Of course. It actually was a lot of fun. I did not know that much about the subject myself before looking into it.
tniem is offline  
Old August 15, 2001, 03:22   #11
Grumbold
Emperor
 
Grumbold's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,732
I'm mostly waiting to find out what is so good about a 2-1-2 unit. Sounds like a horseman to me. Unless horses have disappeared from Civ3 or the stats were a misprint it seems a wasted special. Perhaps they can keep up with the cavalry, but at this early stage of the game that means they are going to be only used if you get a leader very quickly, can build an army stack and archery has added effects above and beyond its basic attack and defence stats.
__________________
To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection. H.Poincare
Grumbold is offline  
Old August 15, 2001, 04:31   #12
Buck Birdseed
Emperor
 
Buck Birdseed's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Khoon Ki Pyasi Dayan (1988)
Posts: 3,951
Perhaps achers/Bowmen/etc. have some sort of special property eg. bombardment or a special position within an Army.
__________________
Världsstad - Dom lokala genrenas vän
Mick102, 102,3 Umeå, Måndagar 20-21
Buck Birdseed is offline  
Old August 15, 2001, 13:53   #13
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
Quote:
Originally posted by tniem


It actually was the best information/read that I could find. I would hope that the people who did AOE have done their work just like the Firaxis team has. I of course would never have used that source if this discussion was in any way important enough to factor into the game. After all Firaxis has already decided, I just wanted to give everyone here some prespective.

I guess my point is that people look at a historical game and assume that what is there is well-researched and they take this with them as truth (like people do with movies, etc) Im not afraid a profesional publisher of books, games, etc will use a game as a source - im saying that ordinary folk "learn" from games, and that inaccuracies MATTER.

LOTM
lord of the mark is offline  
Old August 15, 2001, 22:39   #14
tniem
King
 
Local Time: 07:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Hope College
Posts: 2,232
Quote:
Originally posted by lord of the mark
I guess my point is that people look at a historical game and assume that what is there is well-researched and they take this with them as truth (like people do with movies, etc) Im not afraid a profesional publisher of books, games, etc will use a game as a source - im saying that ordinary folk "learn" from games, and that inaccuracies MATTER.
But what I am trying to say is that if two games have both made the Babylonians have an increased strength archer than their probably is some truth in it. Sure there might be some inaccuracies, but they both wouldn't just make up a new unit for a civ now, would they?

And judging from the pics I have seen from clay tablets and what not, archers on chariots and stuff were very important to the Assyrian and Babylonian armies. So it makes sense that the Babylonians special unit would be an improved archer that has one extra movement point because he is riding on a chariot.
tniem is offline  
Old August 15, 2001, 22:53   #15
General Ludd
NationStates
Emperor
 
General Ludd's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Minion of the Dominion
Posts: 4,607
Quote:
Originally posted by Snapcase
Perhaps achers/Bowmen/etc. have some sort of special property eg. bombardment or a special position within an Army.
I should hope that it's not bombardment.

It's hard to say with out knowing how the combat system works, but I think a first strike, or something similiar would be likely.
General Ludd is offline  
Old August 15, 2001, 22:58   #16
General Ludd
NationStates
Emperor
 
General Ludd's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Minion of the Dominion
Posts: 4,607
Quote:
Originally posted by tniem


But what I am trying to say is that if two games have both made the Babylonians have an increased strength archer than their probably is some truth in it. Sure there might be some inaccuracies, but they both wouldn't just make up a new unit for a civ now, would they?
Well.... that happens with alot of fictional material, you'll find alot of consistancies between different SCI-FI books/TV shows/movies Another thing that comes to mind are aliens, specificly 'the greys', which are featured in just about everything relating to aliens that has ever existed. (though, that is an unkown subject, so probably not a great example.)

Not to say that is always the case, though.
General Ludd is offline  
Old August 17, 2001, 00:01   #17
korn469
Emperor
 
korn469's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In the army
Posts: 3,375
Quote:
Originally posted by Grumbold
I'm mostly waiting to find out what is so good about a 2-1-2 unit. Sounds like a horseman to me. Unless horses have disappeared from Civ3 or the stats were a misprint it seems a wasted special. Perhaps they can keep up with the cavalry, but at this early stage of the game that means they are going to be only used if you get a leader very quickly, can build an army stack and archery has added effects above and beyond its basic attack and defence stats.
Quote:
Originally posted by Snapcase
Perhaps achers/Bowmen/etc. have some sort of special property eg. bombardment or a special position within an Army.
ok here is my take on what makes a bowman so special...first firaxis has said that most units require a special resource before you can build them, however the first group of units in civ3, the spearman, chariot, and archer may be exempt from this...however if they are not, then archers may require iron while chariots require horses...since horsemen have been moved up in the tech tree they are most likely 4-1-2, and chariots are most likely 2-1-2...since archers are 2-1-1 i would assume that they are cheaper

we will probably find out the stats on a chariot soon, but if i had to make a prediction here is what i'd go for the ancient age

spearman 1-2-1 (20) {impi 1-2-2} {hoplite 2-2-1}
chariot 2-1-2 (20 horses) {egyptian 3-1-2}
archer 2-1-1 (20) {bowman 2-1-2}
swordman 3-2-1 (30 iron) {legion 4-2-1}
catapult 6-1-1 (40 ?) [bombards]
trireme 1-1-3 (40 ?) [transport 2 ground units]
horsemen 4-1-2 (30 horses)

also firaxis made no mention of hit points or firepower, are they still in?

also if the most recent tech tree is right, then only chariots (possibly), horsemen, and knights will uses horses as a special resource...making it probably a very poor special resource, because it would become completely outdated by the end of the industrial age (motorized transport), and there are no gunpowder horse units...knights are the last thing...i hope we haven't seen it all...

also another point to bring up is armies...how exactly will they work? could a large enough army of warriors defend against a tank? if you had a legion and it attacked four warriors in an army who would win? so maybe having enough units stacked together would make even obsolete units unstoppable...from what i've read it seems that 3 chariots and 3 phalanxes from civ2 (150 shields) would be more cost efficient than 5 archers (150 shields)
korn469 is offline  
Old August 17, 2001, 15:30   #18
tniem
King
 
Local Time: 07:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Hope College
Posts: 2,232
Well, chariot stats have now been revealed at 1-1-2. That means the entire stats of the game are being overhauled.

I am not entirely clear on what this means, other than a chariot is next to useless. Their will be no warmongering early on. So apparently a 2-1-2 archer is going to be better to have than a chariot. Hmmm....

Well, maybe a 2 attack will almost always win against a 1 defense fortified but as soon as you put Spearman in the game at a 2 (?) defense than attacking seems to be over for a while.

I think Firaxis is going to force you to build your civ for a while, which is probably a good idea.
tniem is offline  
Old August 17, 2001, 15:38   #19
KrazyHorse
Deity
 
KrazyHorse's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 138% of your RDA of Irony
Posts: 18,577
The 2-1-2 archer is the Bab special unit. Regular archer is 2-1-1. You trade off attack strength for mobility with chariot vs. archer.
__________________
04-06-04 Killdozer NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
In Memoriam Adam Smith: a brilliant man, taken too soon
Get Rich or Die Tryin'
KrazyHorse is offline  
Old August 17, 2001, 18:54   #20
Grumbold
Emperor
 
Grumbold's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,732
Interestingly though the stats totally bugger up the supposed reason why Babylonians would have needed better archers seeing as ordinary archers are already better units than chariots which aren't worth attacking with
__________________
To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection. H.Poincare
Grumbold is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team