Expansion Pack Civs (Part 3): Just one more... - Page 14

kakaj_azor · October 7, 2001, 11:24

my vote:

poles 20
spanish 20
tartars 20
vikings 20
khmer 10
huns 20
scots 20

Darek87 · October 7, 2001, 12:04

Poles 20

jdd2007 · October 7, 2001, 12:11

Quote:

I did overreact and I do apologise. Thank you for editing your post, jdd2007.

i sincerely accept the apology. ok, r we alright now? its funny how people with a single goal (to get civ3) can argue so much. its just human nature i guess...

jdd2007 · October 7, 2001, 12:16

o ya, i overraected too

Ctty · October 7, 2001, 12:16

Poles 20
Mongols 5
Spanish 5
Huns 5
Arabs 5
Dutch 5

orange · October 7, 2001, 12:35

this list desperately needs an update. I'm fairly sure the Spanish took over the Mongols long ago.

Who ever is making the list - best to have a "last updated" thing underneath it, so we know how up to date it is. Doing a great thing here by the way

lockstep · October 7, 2001, 12:43

Quote:

Originally posted by Ctty
Poles 20
Mongols 5
Spanish 5
Huns 5
Arabs 5
Dutch 5

I guess that means 'As long as the Poles are in, I don´t care about the rest'.

IMO, the significance of this poll is dwindling rapidly.

Fiil · October 7, 2001, 12:56

I guess the majority of Poles don't care for anyone but themselves!! Sad...

Mankind · October 7, 2001, 13:02

Quote:

Originally posted by Fiil
I guess the majority of Poles don't care for anyone but themselves!! Sad...

I with my votes , care for myself, i want to have Poland Mongols & Viking 100% in the expansion

I voted to show how I think; my point of viev, and you voted for yoursefl? or for some one elce?

Gramphos · October 7, 2001, 13:40

Quote:

Originally posted by orange
this list desperately needs an update. I'm fairly sure the Spanish took over the Mongols long ago.

Who ever is making the list - best to have a "last updated" thing underneath it, so we know how up to date it is. Doing a great thing here by the way

First: It is Locutus that makes the list.
Second: Locutus stated before the Poles discussion that he would be without access to the Internet for the weekend and therefor couldn't update the list.
Third: Lucutos writes the name of the last voter counted in the updated list when he updates it. You can also read the last edited ... text in the bottom right corner of the post.

LoD · October 7, 2001, 13:44

Quote:

IMO, the significance of this poll is dwindling rapidly

Why? Just because the Poles are advancing progressively on the list?

Gramphos · October 7, 2001, 14:06

Quote:

Originally posted by LoD
Why? Just because the Poles are advancing progressively on the list?

Maybe because the only people that register just to vote just votes Poles +20

I maybe should ask some friends to came here and vote Neanderthals +20 and nothing more.

LoD · October 7, 2001, 14:09

Gramphos: ONCE. AGAIN. THESE. PEOPLE. ARE. NOT. MY. FRIENDS. AND. THEY. ARE CIVERS.

Now is that clear or should I put that out in boldtype? What don't you understand? That we have Internet connections in Poland too? That we have a large civing community?
I've laid out the facts. Get over with it.

Mankind · October 7, 2001, 14:20

Quote:

Originally posted by LoD
Gramphos: ONCE. AGAIN. THESE. PEOPLE. ARE. NOT. MY. FRIENDS. AND. THEY. ARE CIVERS.

Now is that clear or should I put that out in boldtype? What don't you understand? That we have Internet connections in Poland too? That we have a large civing community?
I've laid out the facts. Get over with it.

Yes I even don't know the guys that [and yes i don't know you too-becose i don't

] voted and LoD probobly don't know them neither

And I have an idea

maybe we'll and this discussion an back on topic?

Gramphos · October 7, 2001, 14:21

Quote:

Originally posted by LoD
Gramphos: ONCE. AGAIN. THESE. PEOPLE. ARE. NOT. MY. FRIENDS. AND. THEY. ARE CIVERS.

Now is that clear or should I put that out in boldtype? What don't you understand? That we have Internet connections in Poland too? That we have a large civing community?
I've laid out the facts. Get over with it.

I'm not questioning you. I'm just trying to understand what lockstep meant, but boldtype could help. Do I need to write clarifications for my use of smilies?
And what I meant was that It is only people (should I say civers) from Poland that registers and votes just for one civ. I believe that there are civers in other nations that don't bother to register to vote, but you poles seem to have no problem with it.
I never said that they were your friends, but there are other apolytoners from Poland that might have friends. (Not using any smilie)

Finally my answer was meant to be fun, as my original vote for the Neanderthals (that I no longer support).

Mankind · October 7, 2001, 14:31

Quote:

And what I meant was that It is only people (should I say civers) from Poland that registers and votes just for one civ

So what? maybe for them ->they want the orginal 16 civs and only and one and only civ which is lacking to them to happiness
[Poland?

]

for Me being lacking are Poland, Mongols, vikings [and maybe one more...]

Gramphos · October 7, 2001, 14:44

Quote:

Originally posted by Mankind
So what? maybe for them ->they want the orginal 16 civs and only and one and only civ which is lacking to them to happiness
[Poland?

]

for Me being lacking are Poland, Mongols, vikings [and maybe one more...]

I truly miss Vikings, Incas and Mongols.

I maybe should reformulate myself:
The only people that seem to register just for voting purpose are from Poland. I don't think a Swede would register for voting in this kind of poll without having interest in posting in the forums also.

Let's leave this matter or create a new thread addicted to discussion of votes in the Expansion Pack Civs POLL.

LoD · October 7, 2001, 14:46

Gramphos: I was mainly replying to your first sentence and it was decorated with a "rolleyes" smiley, which, AFAIK, does not signify humour.

Quote:

I believe that there are civers in other nations that don't bother to register to vote, but you poles seem to have no problem with it.

If their nation deserved a spot and was behind the Eskimos I bet they would have

.

Quote:

I never said that they were your friends, but there are other apolytoners from Poland that might have friends. (Not using any smilie)

Since Master Marcus talked about democracy in this thread, I'll also give my $0.02 in the theme:
The first and foremost jurisdical principle in democracy is presumed innocence.

LoD

Gramphos · October 7, 2001, 14:52

Quote:

Originally posted by LoD
Gramphos: I was mainly replying to your first sentence and it was decorated with a "rolleyes" smiley, which, AFAIK, does not signify humour.

Hey, I was sarcastic.

LoD · October 7, 2001, 14:57

Exactly.

Gramphos · October 7, 2001, 15:08

Quote:

Originally posted by LoD
Exactly.

So why did you use CAPS towards me? How could I be sarcastic without knowing how it really was?
Sarcasm is a kind of humor.

vonholl · October 7, 2001, 15:27

Poles 20
Tartars 20

LoD · October 7, 2001, 15:37

Quote:

How could I be sarcastic without knowing how it really was?

Yet your statements differ from the facts.

Quote:

Sarcasm is a kind of humor.

Well, in my book (the New Oxford Dictionary of English that is

) it's "the use of irony to mock or convey contempt". Hence, hardly a kind of humor.

LoD

Gramphos · October 7, 2001, 15:46

Quote:

Originally posted by LoD
Yet your statements differ from the facts.

That is actually the real reason why I used the rolleyes. I and many other uses rolleyes when saying something that only partly is right.
But let's leave this subject now. (Oh and the

was for the entire post)

Fiil · October 7, 2001, 15:49

Quote:

Originally posted by vonholl
Poles 20
Tartars 20

Freeze vonholl, stop!! I think some people here would like to ask you a question... like will we ever here from again??

Gramphos · October 7, 2001, 15:54

Quote:

Originally posted by Fiil
Freeze vonholl, stop!! I think some people here would like to ask you a question... like will we ever here from again??

As he have entered both ICQ number and Birthdate I think that he'll came back.

Fiil · October 7, 2001, 15:55

Quote:

Originally posted by LoD

quote:

Sarcasm is a kind of humor.

Well, in my book (the New Oxford Dictionary of English that is

) it's "the use of irony to mock or convey contempt". Hence, hardly a kind of humor.

LoD

In Denmark most humor is either ironic or sarcastic - believe it or not! Actually it can be quite hard to understand for foreigners, and they often get offended.

Gramphos · October 7, 2001, 15:59

Quote:

Originally posted by Fiil
In Denmark most humor is either ironic or sarcastic - believe it or not! Actually it can be quite hard to understand for foreigners, and they often get offended.

The same applies for Sweden, at least for the young generation.

kakaj_azor · October 7, 2001, 16:09

Quote:

Originally posted by Fiil

Freeze vonholl, stop!! I think some people here would like to ask you a question... like will we ever here from again??

hello
vonholl is my friend and he will certainly answer your question
but he is very busy now... please be patient

LoD · October 7, 2001, 16:10

Quote:

The same applies for Sweden, at least for the young generation.

AFAIR someone has asked to close the subject a couple of posts ago

...