Thread Tools
Old August 18, 2001, 01:15   #1
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:37
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
civ specific features - the critique - the eqyptian
this thread is part of an ongoing series, the purpose being to critique the civ specific features of each civ from the point of view of historical accuracy. Please post comments on these fetaures that deal primarily with strategy and gameplay issues elsewhere.



Egypt - religious and industrious - ok, relgious certainly, industrious, whether they were harder working of better organized doesnt really matter, certianly their "output" was high.
Whether this would have continued had their civ survived is debatable, but i wont make a fuss. Again we see that civ-spec features dont work to badly for a genuinley old civ.

war chariots - well yes, chariots did dominate their armies, in the late bronze, the height of their power. But then chariots dominated EVERY state's armies at the time (Robert Drews, "End of the Bronze Age") and no evidence Egypts were any better. Oh well, I suppose Firaxis can claim that Egypt were earlier, pointing tot he Hyksos invasions, I dont know that anyone has good dates for the first Hittite, Assyrian or Mycenaean chariots.
Was an eqyptian advantage in war chariot inevitable? I think not, even Firaxis attributes the advantage to the Hyksos invasion. Interesting, the barbs take half your cities and you GAIN a tech Didnt work that way in CIv2, will it in Civ3? Suppose I play a civ3 game where i repel all barb attacks, or where the fortunes of georaphy mean I am never subject to any - yet i still get a war chariot advantage - why?

and btw, though it does not impact gameplay, the statement that the chariots gave up their battlefield dominance to cavalry is outright wrong. They gave up their dominance to infantry. Firaxis has obviously not bothered playing "end of the bronze age" by Pual Cullivan, one of the best ancient period Civ2 scenarios.

All in all only fair. No outrageously ahistorical, but not as good as what they did with the babs.


BTW - for all you folks complaining about eqyptian war chariots and bab bowmen having the same stats - what do you think those bab bowmen were doing? fighting on foot? During the late bronze, which seems to be the time when babs actually had "superiority" in bowmen, they were essentially chariot archers. and the egytian charioteers were chariot archers - the reliefs all show pharoah in a chariot, shooting his bow.


LOTM
lord of the mark is offline  
Old August 18, 2001, 01:55   #2
Urban Ranger
NationStatesApolyton Storywriters' GuildNever Ending Stories
Deity
 
Urban Ranger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:37
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
Posts: 14,606
I see nothing particularly wrong in Firaxis' selections. Certainly religious is spot on, and industrious, well, maybe that has something with their use of slaves.

If you don't like the war chariots perhaps you should propose something new.
__________________
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
Urban Ranger is offline  
Old August 18, 2001, 02:02   #3
KrazyHorse
Deity
 
KrazyHorse's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:37
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 138% of your RDA of Irony
Posts: 18,577
War chariots are fine with me. Given that we're pre-tailoring (yes, LOTM, I'll admit that) civs to rise to diminance at certain times, we take the most important weapon of the civ's army during their "golden age". In the Egyptians' case, it was the war chariot.

Besides which, every biblical movie I've seen depicts Ramses II's army riding into battle on war chariots.
__________________
04-06-04 Killdozer NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
In Memoriam Adam Smith: a brilliant man, taken too soon
Get Rich or Die Tryin'
KrazyHorse is offline  
Old August 18, 2001, 22:45   #4
monkspider
Civilization IV: MultiplayerCivilization IV CreatorsGalCiv Apolyton Empire
King
 
monkspider's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:37
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wichita
Posts: 1,352
The exact point I was going to raise myself Krazyhorse!
Whether or not Egyptian chariots were to a significant degree superior than other civilization's at time is irrelevant, the main piece of military equipment that comes to mind in the mainstream gamer's head when they think of Egypt is the chariot. Perhaps they just instantly imagine the chariots of Egypt chasing after Moses in the ten commandments.
And we must remember, this game is targeting the mainstream gamer. That simple fact can explain away many of the ahistorical information Firaxis is giving us.
All in all, another great post LotM, I will be looking forward to the next installment just as I have this one.
monkspider is offline  
Old August 19, 2001, 16:43   #5
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:37
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
Quote:
Originally posted by Urban Ranger
I see nothing particularly wrong in Firaxis' selections. Certainly religious is spot on, and industrious, well, maybe that has something with their use of slaves.

If you don't like the war chariots perhaps you should propose something new.

I presume most people reading these boards know what my proposal was for dealing with this issue in civ3. That proposal was not adopted. I am now only critiquing the way that Firaxis is implementing things. To the extent that there are people left who think civ specific units can be made historically accurate, it is up to them to suggest accurate replacements where Firaxis has been inaccurate, not up to me, since i have always believed that the entire concept is inaccurate in a 6000 yr game.

LOTM
lord of the mark is offline  
Old August 20, 2001, 01:24   #6
tniem
King
 
Local Time: 07:37
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Hope College
Posts: 2,232
Quote:
Originally posted by Urban Ranger
Certainly religious is spot on, and industrious, well, maybe that has something with their use of slaves.
Probably has more to do with building the Pyramids without wheels.
tniem is offline  
Old August 20, 2001, 21:05   #7
Kc7mxo
King
 
Kc7mxo's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:37
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,038
Actually there are some archeologists currently propising that the egyptians used wheels to construct the pyramids by attaching quarter circle constructions on four sides of a block, essentially making it into a large wheel. they are using models found in tombs which had been hithertoo unexplained as their evidence.

neat huh?
Kc7mxo is offline  
Old August 21, 2001, 01:14   #8
tniem
King
 
Local Time: 07:37
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Hope College
Posts: 2,232
Quote:
Originally posted by Kc7mxo
Actually there are some archeologists currently propising that the egyptians used wheels to construct the pyramids by attaching quarter circle constructions on four sides of a block, essentially making it into a large wheel. they are using models found in tombs which had been hithertoo unexplained as their evidence.

neat huh?
Definitely. Had not read or heard that.

But the fact still remains that the Egyptians were probably classified as Industrious for building the Pyramids, Sphinx, and other tombs all over their nation.
tniem is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team