August 21, 2001, 11:28
|
#1
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 07:42
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: of my own little kingdom...
Posts: 317
|
whats better ctp2 or civ2
were having 2 debates over ctp2 vs civ3, what do you guys think of ctp2 vs civ2?
__________________
"Nuke em all, let god sort it out!"
|
|
|
|
|
August 21, 2001, 12:31
|
#2
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 13:42
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: of nothing
Posts: 361
|
I don't have CTP2 but I have the first part. When I first saw CTP1 in computer magazines I thaught it was way better than Civ2 and bought it. But after 2 days of gameplay I realized that I made a mistake in buying it. It just can't be compared to Civ2 - and because CTP2 isn't supposed to be much better than CTP1.....figure it out yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 21, 2001, 16:03
|
#3
|
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 07:42
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Washington, D.C., USA
Posts: 79
|
I don't have Call to Power II, but I've heard enough about it. It's a lame remake of Call to Power, full of mistakes (like fascism coming before nationalism  ) and bugs. I don't even consider it to be a new game. The resemblance to Call to Power is far too great.
Now, about CTP and Civ II... They just have different feels to them. Civ II is wonderfully detailed, and has the best diplomatic system I've seen. It's only drawback is that it's an ancient game. Call to Power beats Civ II in graphics, interface, and realism. But together with that, it has a mechanical feel to it.
What Call to Power cannot be compared to is Civ III.
__________________
Truth is not negotiable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 21, 2001, 17:21
|
#4
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 08:42
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,361
|
[C]rap [T]o [P]lay
Ctp 1 and 2 are not worthy of the Civillization title. They should be banned the world over!
Ctp is the product of some corporate moneymonger that saw profit potential in the series.
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 21, 2001, 17:35
|
#5
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 04:42
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: I live amongst the Red Sox Nation
Posts: 7,969
|
no game in history....has been worth the 34.95 price tag of civ2 mge....too bad its extra money i shelled out for a game that should have already been released in the origional...... HOWEVER
ctp1 had neat concepts but was too clunky and slow for MP..... ctp 2 i tried for two days...figured it wasn't worth it...
civ3.... jury is out.... topping civ2 will be difficult for game value.... long term that is..... i still love civ2 multi player
__________________
Boston Red Sox are 2004 World Series Champions!
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 21, 2001, 19:09
|
#6
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 06:42
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago, IL U.S.A.
Posts: 300
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by War4ever
no game in history....has been worth the 34.95 price tag of civ2 mge....too bad its extra money i shelled out for a game that should have already been released in the origional...
|
You got that right, 2.42 forever!
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 21, 2001, 23:39
|
#7
|
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 07:42
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Washington, D.C., USA
Posts: 79
|
Re: [C]rap [T]o [P]lay
__________________
Truth is not negotiable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 22, 2001, 02:22
|
#8
|
|
Apolyton CS Co-Founder
Local Time: 14:42
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Macedonia, Greece
Posts: 24,480
|
Re: whats better ctp2 or civ2
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by splangy
were having 2 debates over ctp2 vs civ3, what do you guys think of ctp2 vs civ2?
|
http://apolyton.net/forums/showthrea...threadid=24257
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:42.
|
|
