Thread Tools
Old August 25, 2001, 07:00   #1
BeBro
Emperor
 
BeBro's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,278
Hitpoints/Firepower?
Sorry if this has been discussed before, but all units we have seen so far in the "civ of the week" editions had only values for attack, defense and move. Is the HP/FP system gone?
__________________
Banana
BeBro is offline  
Old August 25, 2001, 07:15   #2
Tventano
Warlord
 
Tventano's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Enschede, The Netherlands
Posts: 177
I really hope so. It is just one level extra of needless complexity. This HP/FP system can easily be simulated by higher Attack/Defense ratings.

Probably the number of hitpoints varies with the time period and the veteranness (veteran +1, elite +2) of the unit.

Because of this added complexity CivII was much more a wargame than CivI. I am happy they are getting closer to the original idea.
Tventano is offline  
Old August 25, 2001, 07:24   #3
BeBro
Emperor
 
BeBro's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,278
Personally I like the FP/HP system, but mainly for scenario design reasons - it gives you more flexibility here.
__________________
Banana
BeBro is offline  
Old August 25, 2001, 08:14   #4
Admiral
Prince
 
Admiral's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: of the peace and coexistance movement
Posts: 443
In one of the Ask the civ team'sit was mentioned that armis pooled their hit points. So at least hit points are in.
__________________
"Remember, there's good stuff in American culture, too. It's just that by "good stuff" we mean "attacking the French," and Germany's been doing that for ages now, so, well, where does that leave us?" - Elok
Admiral is offline  
Old August 25, 2001, 08:50   #5
Roman
King
 
Roman's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Posts: 1,292
I also like the FP/HP system and we know at least hit points have been kept in civ 3.
__________________
Rome rules
Roman is offline  
Old August 25, 2001, 10:31   #6
barefootbadass
Prince
 
Local Time: 12:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 378
Having HP/FP to ramp up in modern times can help prevent the phalanx-beats-armor phenomenon. You need to have at least one of the two or you will have ancient units beating modern machines of war on occasion.
barefootbadass is offline  
Old August 25, 2001, 11:49   #7
Nemo
Prince
 
Nemo's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: numsquam
Posts: 683
I have seen no mention of FP, but they did say that in order to prevent phalax-tank issues, they have devised a 'class' system of some sort. Since the FP was originally designed to prevent the phalax-tank issues, I suppose that FP is out.
Nemo is offline  
Old August 25, 2001, 12:30   #8
hetairoi22
Warlord
 
hetairoi22's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: In an apartment with my Norwegian family
Posts: 223
I have read somewhere that the strength of ZOC depends on FP. F.x. it is harder to go past a tankt than to go past a Phalanx. I don't remember where I read it, though.
__________________
My Website: www.geocities.com/civcivciv2002/index.html
My Forums: http://pub92.ezboard.com/bacivcommunity
hetairoi22 is offline  
Old August 25, 2001, 16:14   #9
Provost Harrison
Apolytoners Hall of FameCivilization IV PBEMPolyCast Team
Deity
 
Provost Harrison's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Germans own my soul.
Posts: 14,861
I think it would be a shame if HP/FP are gone. I would have hoped that the concept would have been improved upon, but kept nonetheless. I do not want to see a return to the civ1 combat system, which was too basic with it's 'phalanx beats battleship' incidents...
__________________
Speaking of Erith:

"It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith
Provost Harrison is offline  
Old August 25, 2001, 16:32   #10
barefootbadass
Prince
 
Local Time: 12:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 378
Just because civ2 had fire power and phalanx vs tank was a problem sometimes doesn't mean it wasn't making the phalanx win less often. The reason it happened was because you could pile up too many defensive modifiers on the phalanx. If there hadn't been a differential FP/HP system in civ 2 this phenomenon would have happened a lot more often. I don't think there should be a class system such that unit A could never defeat unit B, but there should be a probability like system such that an ancient unit beating a modern one would be something like winning the lottery, i.e., the modern unit malfunctions or something. Btw, I'm pretty sure I never saw a phalanx beat a tank, except for when the tank started out in the red and the phalanx was green, and then it would be quite possible to see something malfunction.
barefootbadass is offline  
Old August 25, 2001, 16:36   #11
Ralf
King
 
Ralf's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,728
Quote:
Originally posted by Tventano
I really hope so. It is just one level extra of needless complexity. This HP/FP system can easily be simulated by higher Attack/Defense ratings.
But they have not made the attack/defence points any higher. Instead they have down-tuned them. Those 1-1-2 standard chariots for example, really seems quite worthless - heck they even need the horse-resource to be built at all. One can always tweak the Rules.txt files of course, and I guess the downtuned attack-values makes conquering cities without forged armies much harder. We dont know anything about the ADM-data for modern units yet, I admit.

Quote:
Because of this added complexity CivII was much more a wargame than CivI. I am happy they are getting closer to the original idea.
Health bar (or damage-bar) for units may increase after each victory in combat. If a unit has won several battles, there is a small chance that unit could become a Great Leader. This ensures that HP and hopefully also FP (or some classification-system) is included and that indevidual combat-units will not fight in the same simple way that they did in Civ-1. Still, why not add HP and class-system also in the "civ of the week" at http://www.civ3.com/ ?

Last edited by Ralf; August 25, 2001 at 17:36.
Ralf is offline  
Old August 26, 2001, 04:32   #12
BeBro
Emperor
 
BeBro's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,278
Quote:
Originally posted by Ralf
Still, why not add HP and class-system also in the "civ of the week"?
Yes, I also would like to see this. However, perhaps they are still finetunig this system, this may be a reason for "hiding" it.
__________________
Banana
BeBro is offline  
Old August 26, 2001, 09:21   #13
Cyclotron
Never Ending StoriesThe Courts of Candle'Bre
King
 
Cyclotron's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cyclo-who?
Posts: 2,995
Keep Hit Points and Firepower!
I must point out that in my opinion, it was the lack of hp and fp in CTP that destroyed the game and ruined its combat system. C'mon, guys! You can almost always determine who is going to win any battle with just attack and defense. Add up the terrain bonuses, the fortification bonuses, the veteran bonuses, compare the two numbers and you might as well just throw in the towel already if your number is lower. That's the way without hp/fp.

With these values, however, we can put more strategy and suspense/excitement into Civ3. A unit with a low attack but a high firepower doesn't hit an enemy very often, but when it does, it hits hard. Think bombers, early submarines, V-2 rockets, etc. Likewise, a unit could have a high attack but little firepower, thus delivering a lot of blows to the oppponent but each doing very little damage. Perhaps a lot of ranged units fit this description?

The same goes for defense and hit points. A tank has good armor (defense) but if a shell or bomb pierces it's armor shell, many vital systems and crewmen could be destroyed, thus taking out the tank.

Why settle for anything less? I am interested in what exactly Firaxis has in mind, and I hope that they will include hp and fp in some form, whether by unit, army, or whatever.
Cyclotron is offline  
Old August 26, 2001, 13:56   #14
SlowThinker
GameLeagueApolytoners Hall of Fame
King
 
SlowThinker's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: homeless, Praha, Czech Republic
Posts: 2,603
The FP is useless
FP has (almost) no effect (may be substituted by an increased HP).
A 10HP/2FP unit is almost equal to a 20HP/1FP unit.
Only the effect of the fortuity is lower in the case of the 20HP/1FP unit.
SlowThinker is offline  
Old August 27, 2001, 02:11   #15
BeBro
Emperor
 
BeBro's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,278
I don´t believe that is true. I experimented a lot with HP/FP for my scenarios, and more FP can have an enormous effect...
__________________
Banana
BeBro is offline  
Old August 27, 2001, 16:24   #16
SlowThinker
GameLeagueApolytoners Hall of Fame
King
 
SlowThinker's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: homeless, Praha, Czech Republic
Posts: 2,603
Quote:
Originally posted by BeBro
I don´t believe that is true. I experimented a lot with HP/FP for my scenarios, and more FP can have an enormous effect...
But more HP too...
SlowThinker is offline  
Old August 28, 2001, 01:18   #17
Urban Ranger
NationStatesApolyton Storywriters' GuildNever Ending Stories
Deity
 
Urban Ranger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
Posts: 14,606
I think firepower can be effectively removed if Firaxis would just adjust the attack and defense of units accordingly.

IIRC, a unit with a 10 attack and a 2 FP is the same as a unit with a 20 attack.
__________________
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
Urban Ranger is offline  
Old August 28, 2001, 01:52   #18
Nenad
Chieftain
 
Nenad's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Kragujevac, Serbia, Yugoslavia
Posts: 45
I believe that ancient units had FP/HP both 1, and this is maybe the reason for their absence from "civ of the week" section - lack of importance for given units (so far).

I'm also convinced that FP/HP are in civ3, but can't tell why.
(Must be something that I read somewhere)
Nenad is offline  
Old August 28, 2001, 05:45   #19
Mister Pleasant
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
CTP and CTP2 had FP (the flags were all set to '2' initially in CTP1).

Quote:
IIRC, a unit with a 10 attack and a 2 FP is the same as a unit with a 20 attack.
I think your wrong on that Urban Ranger. Didn't firepower have to do with how fast hitpoints were lost? So you could have a clumsy unit (say a steam-powered tank with a fixed turret) with a low attack but with a high firepower (say a f_cking big cannon mounted on said steam-powered tank). Unlikely the tank is going to hit anyhthing that can move quickly like a rifleman. But if the tank ever manages to hit the rifleman, the high firepower rating will take the rifleman down.

I could be wrong though . . .
 
Old August 28, 2001, 06:14   #20
kolpo
Prince
 
Local Time: 12:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 314
Firepower of other unit deteminates indeed how much Hp are lost when a unit loses 1 round.

An assasin unit with 1 attack, 10 firepower is really different then a good sword men with a weak sword with 10 attack 1 firepower.
Just create both units with civ2 editor and you will see. Randomness has a much bigger influence on the assasin then on the sword men. The sword men in this case will quite always beat "weaker" units(with no additional bonuses) and lose from stronger ones the assasin on the other hand will sometimes win from really stronger units and will sometimes lose from weaker units. FP is very important for scenario units.

Last edited by kolpo; August 28, 2001 at 06:20.
kolpo is offline  
Old August 28, 2001, 14:32   #21
SlowThinker
GameLeagueApolytoners Hall of Fame
King
 
SlowThinker's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: homeless, Praha, Czech Republic
Posts: 2,603
Quote:
Originally posted by Urban Ranger
IIRC, a unit with a 10 attack and a 2 FP is the same as a unit with a 20 attack.
This is wrong.
A 20AF (attack factor) 1FP unit has similar effect as 10AF 2FP unit against units with very different DF (defense factor) - much smaller (1 for example) or much higher (100 for example)
but has similar effect as 10AF 3FP unit against units with DF=10.

In other words, an increment (better a multiple) of the DF or AF is usually better than an increment in FP (or HP).

See the Info: Combat (GL) thread.
SlowThinker is offline  
Old August 28, 2001, 19:20   #22
n.c.
Emperor
 
n.c.'s Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: North Carolina, best state in the union
Posts: 3,894
The HP/FP system is the minimum acceptable.

There is a better way to ensure that phalanxes don't beat tanks: design the game so that ancient units cannot exist beyond a certain point. For example, once a civ has gunpowder it gets 10 turns to upgrade to musketeers or the older unit disappears.

But why would a game want to use historical reality and the best ideas from SMAC when you can have random-@ssed archers fighting paratroopers?
n.c. is offline  
Old August 28, 2001, 19:43   #23
Cyclotron
Never Ending StoriesThe Courts of Candle'Bre
King
 
Cyclotron's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cyclo-who?
Posts: 2,995
The fp/hp system works roughly like this:

Each unit has 10 hp per "hit point number."
The attack and defense values dictate the probability of a sucessful attack.
When two units fight, the attack vs. defense numbers dictate who gets the first hit. Whoever sucessfully hits the opponents deals damage according to fire power, and may take a small amount of damage itself.

I'm not sure about the firepower exact values for damge, but a howitzer (3 hp, 2 fp) takes out a rifleman (2 hp, 1 fp) in two hits, so perhaps someone can extrapolate the values from there.
Cyclotron is offline  
Old August 28, 2001, 19:46   #24
isaac brock
Warlord
 
isaac brock's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Amherstburg, Ontario
Posts: 240
Quote:
Originally posted by hetairoi22
I have read somewhere that the strength of ZOC depends on FP. F.x. it is harder to go past a tankt than to go past a Phalanx. I don't remember where I read it, though.
Yeah, I read that on civ fanatics. Faster units are not going to be stopped by a warrior. And settlers should not slow you down. I hate those bastards.
__________________
Retired, and it feels so good!
isaac brock is offline  
Old August 28, 2001, 19:53   #25
Chronus
Prince
 
Local Time: 12:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 371
Quote:
This HP/FP system can easily be simulated by higher Attack/Defense ratings.
BOOOO!

HP/FP is good because it forces me to think BEYOND the current battle. If I win, I still have to consider what to do with my wounded unit(s). Do I attack a muskateer with my expensive battleship with only a red sliver left in my health bar? Should I crawl all my wounded troops back to the safety of a city before the enemy finishes them off or leave a couple behind on mountains to hopefully slow down my pursuers?

Having this system also gives more value to barracks, airports and sea ports.
Chronus is offline  
Old August 28, 2001, 20:23   #26
Cyclotron
Never Ending StoriesThe Courts of Candle'Bre
King
 
Cyclotron's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cyclo-who?
Posts: 2,995
Quote:
Originally posted by n.c.
There is a better way to ensure that phalanxes don't beat tanks: design the game so that ancient units cannot exist beyond a certain point. For example, once a civ has gunpowder it gets 10 turns to upgrade to musketeers or the older unit disappears.
I don't like that, nc. I can't tell you how annoying that would be to have to stop building an improvement or wonder just to make sure all my defense forces don't suddenly disappear. It's also untrue historically. Tanks should beat phalanxes because tanks are superior units and phalanxes are inferior, not because of some arbitrary cut-off point.
Cyclotron is offline  
Old August 28, 2001, 21:49   #27
barefootbadass
Prince
 
Local Time: 12:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 378
Urban - My understanding of how battles were handled(in civ2) was that in each round of combat, a units chance of damaging the other unit would be like A / A + D for the attacker and D / A + D for the defender. This means that a 10 attack power unit with 2 FP would not be comparable to a 20 atack unit with 1 FP. The first unit would average 1 damage per round against a 10 defense unit and the second would average aboutt 2 / 3 damage per round. Anyway, I never tested this rigorously but the system seemed to work this way to me.

Chronus - I totally agree with you about the element of strategy it adds when you have to think about how weak your units will be when you win a battle. Of course, there would in any event have to be at least a flat 1/1 FP/HP system at the least, but I find a system with differing FP/HP to be more interesting.
barefootbadass is offline  
Old August 28, 2001, 22:54   #28
Urban Ranger
NationStatesApolyton Storywriters' GuildNever Ending Stories
Deity
 
Urban Ranger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
Posts: 14,606
I understand the attack rating affects how often an attacker hits the defender, and the firepower rating affects how much damage is done.

It seems to me that, however, a unit with 30 attack and 1fp is the same as a unit with 10 attack and 3 fp. The reason being that, the former unit has 3 times the chance to damage an opponent. Since there is no "armor" in Civ that reduces damage, these two units are statistically the same.


Chronus,

I don't see how that can be different. The strength of your units are determined by two things: how fast they can destroy their enemies and how tough they are to begin with. The former is determined by attack and fp while the latter by defense and hp. As I explained above attack and fp can be combined.
__________________
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
Urban Ranger is offline  
Old August 29, 2001, 05:37   #29
kolpo
Prince
 
Local Time: 12:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 314
Quote:
It seems to me that, however, a unit with 30 attack and 1fp is the same as a unit with 10 attack and 3 fp.
.
I have done a the following test(it was all on grassland no unit was veteran or had other bonuses and all had full health):

the 2 units:
unit A: attack: 10 defense: 1 hp: 1 firepower: 3
unit B: attack: 30 defense: 1 hp: 1 firepower: 1

I have let them both attack each of the following 2 units 100 times(in 100 seperated fights for every combination so 400 fights in total where they all started with full health and had no bonuses):
unit C: attack: 1 defense: 12 hp: 1 firepower: 3
unit D: attack: 1 defense: 18 hp: 1 firepower: 2

The results where:

unit A attacks unit C: unit A has won 34 times
unit B attacks unit C: unit B has won 76 times
unit A attacks unit D: unit A has won 16 times
unit B attacks unit D: unit B has won 63 times

Conclusion: a unit with 30 attack and 1 fp is NOT the same as a unit with 10 attack and 3 fp.

Last edited by kolpo; August 29, 2001 at 05:43.
kolpo is offline  
Old August 29, 2001, 05:43   #30
Sabre2th
King
 
Sabre2th's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:48
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,691
Quote:
Conclusion: a unit with 30 attack and 1 fp is NOT the same as a unit with 10 attack and 3 fp.
Exactly.
Sabre2th is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team