Graphics Showcase - Page 8

DarthVeda · March 22, 2002, 01:19

Quote:

Originally posted by Case

Prom, is that taken from Panzer General?

That's what I was thinking

Prometeus · March 22, 2002, 01:40

Right, it'as from PANZER GENERAL

techumseh · March 22, 2002, 08:13

Very nice. But why cut off the top of the tail of the Meteor?

klesh · March 22, 2002, 11:57

Thanks Jimmywax. Added 'em in straight away.

-FMK.

Jimmywax · March 22, 2002, 12:47

Quote:

Originally posted by techumseh
Very nice. But why cut off the top of the tail of the Meteor?

What do you mean, I didn't think I cut the top off of anything. Here is the picture that I worked off of.

techumseh · March 22, 2002, 12:57

OK, sorry. It looked that way to me. I guess it's time to stop putting off that visit to the optometrist. You're developing quite a collection of Korean War era aircraft. Are you doing a scenario?

Jimmywax · March 22, 2002, 13:03

Why yes I am.

Unfortunatly about the only thing holding me up is the fact that I don't have a map that I like.

techumseh · March 22, 2002, 13:38

What dimensions do you want? What area is to be covered? ie. just Korea and immediately adjacent territory, or larger parts of China and/or Japan? Soviet maritime territories?

Jimmywax · March 22, 2002, 13:52

Quote:

Originally posted by techumseh
What dimensions do you want? What area is to be covered? ie. just Korea and immediately adjacent territory, or larger parts of China and/or Japan? Soviet maritime territories?

Dimensions I am not sure about, I know I want it big but not huge. For territory you almost hit it right on the nose. I wanted part of Manchuria, Korea, Western Japan for airbases to fly sorties out of and maybe Tokyo (not necessary), maybe some Soviet territory if possible to show the possibility of escalation.

DarthVeda · March 22, 2002, 14:27

http://darthveda.tripod.com/maps.html

techumseh · March 22, 2002, 14:45

Have a look at DV's map. If you want something a bit smaller, let me know and I'll give it a shot.

Case · March 22, 2002, 18:42

Hey Jimmy, check out the Korean War Scenario in the fantastic game 'The Operational Art of War'.

Jimmywax · March 22, 2002, 19:22

It just so happens that I have that game. I have a game of the Korean War going (for about five months now!) but haven't been able to really get into it. I play a little here and a little there. Maybe I should get my @$$ in gear and finish it.

Soundwave · March 23, 2002, 16:08

Do they look ok?

The ANZAC · March 24, 2002, 10:55

Just yesterday I figured out what this is....

Well, if you want to change the color of a unit, just edit the palette with the new shades you want instead. But that us a pain in the @$$ trying to match them exactly. Well, Nemo had this in many of his gif files. It conviently matches up some basic shades. This is also in Scott F's Turtledove scenario.

ravagon · March 24, 2002, 20:31

Here's the human (ie: British) segment of the WotW Martians units posted a page or so back

[Edit: Image has been deleted as I stuffed it up and couldn't seem to replace the image with an attachment. See a few posts further down. Sorrrryy.

]

Can the next person to post let me know if it hasn't shown up? Just in case I've stuffed up again. cheers

This one is in .jpg format so it'll have to be converted to ToT's 24/32 bit .bmp format before use.

First row : 3 Anti-air arty, then a couple of armoured track-layers, 3 SP arty and a tunnelling track-layer - complete with drill heads in front for ... tunnelling.

Second row : A constructor (engineer type), Obs. balloon, a (pretty lousy) submersible, a xeno-telepath (ok that one isn't human), a (grossly oversized oops

) martian flying machine (not human either

), 3 martian buildings and finally the martian city icon which snuck into the units ... somehow.
Well, so much for this being for the humans

Colwyn · March 24, 2002, 20:46

1942 - Soviet SU-76M SP Gun
Armament: 1 - 76.2mm ZIS gun
Engine: 2 - GAZ, 6 cyl. gas, each 85 hp
Speed: 28 mph
Range: 280 miles
Crew; 4
Weight: 12 tons

Mounted on obsolete T-70 light tank chassis. Used in
direct fire support of infantry. Open superstructure increased
vulnerability of crew and did not provide protection against
the elements. Had a long career, serving with many nations
into the late 1980's. Produced in large numbers, second only to the T-34.

Case · March 24, 2002, 21:04

Quote:

Originally posted by ravagon
Can the next person to post let me know if it hasn't shown up? Just in case I've stuffed up again. cheers

It isn't showing up. If you want the picture to show, you need to attach the picture to the post, and not post a link. Simply use the 'attach file' button which is above the 'submit reply' button

Soundwave · March 24, 2002, 23:50

So no-one like the units thing i posted?

Jimmywax · March 25, 2002, 01:33

They look fine Soundwave. What exactly are you looking for? Are there some new ones there or did you just want approval of your choices?

Soundwave · March 25, 2002, 01:50

I have deleted 5 units slots to make way for the ones i want, the one i posted in urgent help thread

The ANZAC · March 25, 2002, 20:22

Soundwave: Yeah the selection is nice for the scenario

Giz.moe: Like the African units

Soundwave · March 26, 2002, 22:13

Thank you

Soundwave · March 27, 2002, 04:44

Well Done Winterfritz

The ANZAC · March 27, 2002, 19:11

I don't mind, whichever one you want.

Case · March 27, 2002, 22:54

Quote:

Originally posted by Field Marshal Klesh
I have made it so, but have not decided whether to use this or Curts new one in 2194.Thoughts Anzac/Case?

Use Anzac's/my Lancaster. IMO, Curt got the proportions wrong. The Lancaster was a fairly tall and 'chunky' plane, not the sleek thing that Curt drew.

I spent a disturbingly large chunk of my youth drooling over the Australian War Memorial's Lancaster 'G for George', so I'm rather familiar with the Lancaster