|
View Poll Results: If the Americans get a second CU, what should it be?
|
|
Enterprise Class
|
|
5 |
17.24% |
Iowa Class
|
|
1 |
3.45% |
Mustang
|
|
0 |
0% |
Apache
|
|
3 |
10.34% |
Seal
|
|
4 |
13.79% |
Militia
|
|
4 |
13.79% |
B-52
|
|
3 |
10.34% |
other, please specify
|
|
9 |
31.03% |
|
September 9, 2001, 15:50
|
#1
|
King
Local Time: 14:15
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Scio Me Nihil Scire
Posts: 2,532
|
If the Americans get a second CU, what should it be?
If the Americans get a second CU, what should it be? Providing the American CU is the F-15 Eagle.
Enterprise Class: Carrier
Iowa Class: Battleship
Mustang: Fighter
Apache: Helicopter
Militia: Partisan
Seal: Marine
B-52: Bomber
__________________
Quod Me Nutrit Me Destruit
|
|
|
|
September 9, 2001, 16:00
|
#2
|
Emperor
Local Time: 09:15
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Germantown, Maryland
Posts: 3,470
|
An enhanced settler or worker type of unit. It could either work faster, or be cheaper. This would be to demonstrate that America tranformed wilderness into an industrial society very quickly.
|
|
|
|
September 9, 2001, 16:23
|
#3
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 13:15
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 39
|
Minuteman - stats somewhere between a musketeer and rifleman, with partisan abilities.
|
|
|
|
September 9, 2001, 16:28
|
#4
|
Technical Director
Local Time: 15:15
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chalmers, Sweden
Posts: 9,294
|
Cowboy (Double movement in deserts)
All theses UU/CU polls are boring
__________________
ACS - Technical Director
|
|
|
|
September 9, 2001, 16:48
|
#5
|
Emperor
Local Time: 08:15
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: flying too low to the ground
Posts: 4,625
|
and MarkL's icon scares me
__________________
"I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
- Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card
|
|
|
|
September 9, 2001, 17:04
|
#6
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 13:15
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by UberKruX
and MarkL's icon scares me
|
|
|
|
|
September 9, 2001, 18:30
|
#7
|
King
Local Time: 07:15
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Liberal Socialist Party of Apolyton. Fargo Chapter
Posts: 1,649
|
__________________
Nothing to see here, move along: http://selzlab.blogspot.com
The attempt to produce Heaven on Earth often produces Hell. -Karl Popper
|
|
|
|
September 9, 2001, 19:35
|
#8
|
Guest
|
Navy Seal.
Because they go do their job only none of us know what their job is. They are never talk about period.
|
|
|
|
September 9, 2001, 20:53
|
#9
|
Prince
Local Time: 08:15
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Life Goes On
Posts: 519
|
drunken attica rioter..
|
|
|
|
September 9, 2001, 20:56
|
#10
|
Prince
Local Time: 07:15
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: MO
Posts: 543
|
minuteman defenately. they should have the same as musketmen or whatever the typical gun toting unit is at the time but with hella movement bonuses
maybe treat all squares as roads
|
|
|
|
September 9, 2001, 23:00
|
#11
|
Emperor
Local Time: 09:15
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Germantown, Maryland
Posts: 3,470
|
Historically the Minutemen were ineffective in battle. If they could reduce the stats and along with a reduction in cost and an increase in speed, that would be cool. America could have swarms of cheap minutemen that overwhelm its enemies.
|
|
|
|
September 14, 2001, 10:16
|
#12
|
King
Local Time: 08:15
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,038
|
Its true that minuteman weren't great in battle. They were just militia after all.
I do like the idea of special guerrila fighters, perhaps they'd get a bonus for attacking from forrests. That was when the minutemen were most effective.
On the other hand, the settler unit would be reasonable, a special settler that could do everything the civ2 settler does.
|
|
|
|
September 14, 2001, 10:37
|
#13
|
Prince
Local Time: 05:15
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 610
|
I'll vote for the Minuteman as well.
We can use the same logic for Minutemen that Civ3 is already using for the Persian Immortals. Yeah, they might not have been more effective in battle individually, but their sheer numbers and the quickness with which they were mobilized essentially equate to improved stats.
Also, I don't want to overload the Americans with late-game power units.
__________________
"Harel didn't replay. He just stood there, with his friend, transfixed by the brown balls."
|
|
|
|
September 14, 2001, 12:49
|
#14
|
King
Local Time: 07:15
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,555
|
While I think the Minuteman is a good idea, I think the Enhanced Settler or Worker is brilliant idea. That truly would be a Unique Unit and one that can be easily defined in its context.
|
|
|
|
September 14, 2001, 14:33
|
#15
|
King
Local Time: 08:15
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Hope College
Posts: 2,232
|
The U.S. used the carriers to dominate the sea for much of the 20th Century. An important fixture in the military even today although many military strategists now say they are obsolete.
It should be the unique unit.
Minutemen would be a cool unit but seems to only fit in Revolutionary war scenarios.
__________________
About 24,000 people die every day from hunger or hunger-related causes. With a simple click daily at the Hunger Site you can provide food for those who need it.
|
|
|
|
September 14, 2001, 17:02
|
#16
|
King
Local Time: 09:15
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,015
|
The settler would be good, but I think the militia is truly american. 1860s american militia could beat 1940s British "Homeguard." The Revolutionary war and the first years of the (american) civil war were fought (almost) completely with militia. It would fit into a good time period too, after the french musketeers and before the german panzers. because they obviously werent the best fighters, they should get a movement bonus (treat all terrain like road?) and/or a defensive bonus when in its own (home?) city radius
how u like my ... 3rd post?
|
|
|
|
September 14, 2001, 17:48
|
#17
|
Warlord
Local Time: 13:15
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: of Apolyton
Posts: 264
|
I vote for other, please specify...the Abram's Tank. That is a good possibility.
|
|
|
|
September 14, 2001, 21:00
|
#18
|
Deity
Local Time: 09:15
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 138% of your RDA of Irony
Posts: 18,577
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by jdd2007
1860s american militia could beat 1940s British "Homeguard."
|
I could beat the entire British Home Guard. By myself. As long as I had a heavy stick of some kind.
|
|
|
|
September 15, 2001, 01:24
|
#19
|
Guest
|
Considering the AI probably WON'T be able to utilize carriers, Enterprise Class would be a dumb idea. I go for minutemen also. Sure they weren't so effective but they also could came from the citizenry with little training. So make the cost equal to infantry unit of the time (to represent increased manpower or whatever) and keep attack/defense equal (again, increased manpower/guerilla tactics) - but increase speed (guerilla tactics and the ability to mobilize locals by using riders) and no special resources like the Indian Elephant UU (fighters bring their own stuff to the battle).
|
|
|
|
September 15, 2001, 09:46
|
#20
|
Prince
Local Time: 08:15
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: of my own little kingdom...
Posts: 317
|
I always thought a good idea would be that it ignores all deffense bonuses for enemy troops besides fortify and City Walls... I meen they were BEST when Fighting in the woods...
Comments?
__________________
"Nuke em all, let god sort it out!"
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:15.
|
|