October 8, 2001, 06:55
|
#1
|
King
Local Time: 10:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,015
|
Poles...take A Look
Settlers who have given Poland 20 recently in Expansion Pack Civs (Part 3): Just one more... -
MarsJan*
Kalbarczyk
Henryk Przerwa*
almaryk*
bartuk
Maveus*
mrozu
vasyl*
Tarquinius
vasyl (voted again poles-20, ???)
DZASKUL*
eXimius
lukasz
borg
ogotai
Staszek*
lukaski*
groza1
Goomich*
Kolobos
hewhocaves
Glazer
Dessloch
Tomasz Wysocki*
jigit
Naphta
Kamasz*
Cantonek*
lhaydi*
pmajewski*
rafal*
kakaj_azor
Darek87*
valdi77*(voted for RUSSIANS as well)
Ctty*
Gimitar*
vonholl
karol*
*indicates that they ONLY voted for poles in their original post note-about 5 of them voted for poles and one or two other civs...
Now remember, a number of these made other votes besides poles, and have posted other messages. however, more than a few have 1 very short post...
now thanks to LoD, i have found that many of these came from polish civ sites and are not fake, but still arnt TRUE APOLYTONERS
Last edited by jdd2007; October 9, 2001 at 06:46.
|
|
|
|
October 8, 2001, 07:20
|
#2
|
Prince
Local Time: 15:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: KULTUR-TERROR
Posts: 958
|
Ah, I smell a Polish conspiracy here
|
|
|
|
October 8, 2001, 07:37
|
#3
|
Warlord
Local Time: 15:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Poland
Posts: 240
|
 now you posted thread 
but what for?
and...
What you mean by "true apolytoners" ?
Am I a "true apolytoner"
By such shouters as you, already began repressions!
you want proofs?
Some lame-man already PM'ed me And I judge that you do not want even to read which one nonsenses wrote to me and polich nation
I will say only that this not was nice things
|
|
|
|
October 8, 2001, 13:26
|
#4
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 15:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 51
|
jdd2007
I thought we all went through this. I am bored with this discusion. Your list shows three things:
1. LoD managed to promote this poll on his website, and he is extremely successful
2. Poles are very well organised. I think you can expect more votes of this kind.
3. Because of this poll Apolyton is going to have many new memers from Poland, who probably did not hear about this site before.
So please, jdd2007, judging by the average number of your posts, I am sure you can start more ambitious thread than this one.
You are the most true apolytoner. We all salute you.
|
|
|
|
October 8, 2001, 13:54
|
#5
|
Prince
Local Time: 09:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 300
|
As I've said in another thread
Quote:
|
a) encouraging Poles who previously aren't in these forums to join
b) thereby raising the proportions of Poles in this forum
c) and thus increasing the votes for Poles
that is unfair.
Why? because by artificially increasing the number of Poles, the proportion of Poles voting here is higher than the proportion of Poles who play civ, simply because non-Apolyton Poles are now joining, while non-Apolyton non-Poles are not.
a fair scenario is:
a) encouraging civ players around the world to join
b) ensuring that the voters in this forum reflect the actual demographics of civ-players
c) increasing the votes for all civs accordingly
|
|
|
|
|
October 8, 2001, 14:01
|
#6
|
Emperor
Local Time: 09:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: flying too low to the ground
Posts: 4,625
|
get someone to check their IPs, it could be the same person
__________________
"I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
- Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card
|
|
|
|
October 8, 2001, 14:50
|
#7
|
Settler
Local Time: 14:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Poland
Posts: 10
|
First of all I voted for few civs coz the others r not that important, I don't have to use all my votes! I just voted for countries which in my opinion SHOULD be in civIII.
and what's wrong in voting only for one civ??? it's not against the rules! so this doesn't really disqualify person.
Also I think admins do check IPs of users, so they dont do multiple voting
|
|
|
|
October 8, 2001, 15:06
|
#8
|
Warlord
Local Time: 15:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Poland
Posts: 240
|
|
|
|
|
October 8, 2001, 16:59
|
#9
|
Prince
Local Time: 09:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 300
|
There is nothing wrong with voting for one civ. But when this is used to propel a civ up unfairly, then there's something wrong.
|
|
|
|
October 8, 2001, 17:00
|
#10
|
Warlord
Local Time: 14:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Manchester, England. Im 1/2 Polish and proud of it!
Posts: 144
|
Now were in NATO (are we in yet?) it's about time the voices of the Poles are heard. BTW I would vote for Poland, but I can't be Arsed reading the whole thing.
1. how do I vote
2. What is the MAX I can give?
__________________
"I know not with what weapons WWIII will be fought with, but WWIV will be fought with sticks & stones". Albert Einstein
"To Alcohol, the cause of and solution to all life's problems"- Homer Simpson
|
|
|
|
October 8, 2001, 18:07
|
#11
|
Prince
Local Time: 09:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 300
|
|
|
|
|
October 9, 2001, 05:06
|
#12
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 15:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by UberKruX
get someone to check their IPs, it could be the same person
|
Why don't you?
BTW, I hope Sid did not tell you what I quoted.
|
|
|
|
October 9, 2001, 06:34
|
#13
|
King
Local Time: 10:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,015
|
the purpose of this thread was to show people that dont read
Expansion Pack Civs (Part 3): Just one more...
that there are many poles that found LoDs website and mechanicly followed the instructions...
|
|
|
|
October 9, 2001, 07:17
|
#14
|
King
Local Time: 16:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: appendix of Europe
Posts: 1,634
|
hm. i could have staged the same travesty and singlehandedly propel serbian empire into the expansion pack
|
|
|
|
October 9, 2001, 17:09
|
#15
|
King
Local Time: 10:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,015
|
Quote:
|
Now were in NATO (are we in yet?) it's about time the voices of the Poles are heard. BTW I would vote for Poland, but I can't be Arsed reading the whole thing.
1. how do I vote
2. What is the MAX I can give?
|
go to the thread Expansion Pack Civs (Part 3): Just one more...
vote for at least 5 civs, 20 max each.
BTW, everyone, this issue has been addressed. i dont think this thread was neccesary in the first place. mark, could u close this?
|
|
|
|
October 10, 2001, 03:26
|
#16
|
Warlord
Local Time: 15:20
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Poland
Posts: 240
|
Quote:
|
BTW, everyone, this issue has been addressed. i dont think this thread was neccesary in the first place. mark, could u close this?
|
Surely for the first once oneself we agree
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:20.
|
|