October 9, 2001, 19:47
|
#1
|
Settler
Local Time: 14:24
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 2
|
Will hotseat games be an option?
Will Civ3 have hotseat?
If not
|
|
|
|
October 9, 2001, 19:49
|
#2
|
Deity
Local Time: 15:24
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Germans own my soul.
Posts: 14,861
|
Well this is the same as asking the PBEM. If it has one, it will have the other as the code would be effectively the same...
__________________
Speaking of Erith:
"It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith
|
|
|
|
October 9, 2001, 19:56
|
#3
|
Warlord
Local Time: 08:24
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 107
|
Its hard to say. They orignally promised hotseat but with mp not shipping with civ3, who know if we'll get it. I definitely hope we do. I know I would use it.
|
|
|
|
October 9, 2001, 20:32
|
#4
|
Emperor
Local Time: 16:24
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,138
|
I just want to know that they fixed the Diplomacy in Hotseat.
Maybe make special turns for negociations.
I don't want the computer to bargain deals for me, and to start wars.
|
|
|
|
October 9, 2001, 21:12
|
#5
|
Emperor
Local Time: 09:24
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In the army
Posts: 3,375
|
if civ3 doesn't have Multiplayer that means it won't have PBEM or hotseat, because they are multiplayer components
|
|
|
|
October 9, 2001, 22:36
|
#6
|
Emperor
Local Time: 10:24
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,361
|
If CivIII MP is not included, I can't imagine that any MP mode will come with the initial release.
Of course, I do hope they plan on incorporating both hotseat and pbem, as both of these modes are vital to the survival of the current CIV community. (but why would Firaxis commit such an atrocity as no hotseat/pbem?)
|
|
|
|
October 10, 2001, 03:21
|
#7
|
Emperor
Local Time: 16:24
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 3,218
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by korn469
if civ3 doesn't have Multiplayer that means it won't have PBEM or hotseat, because they are multiplayer components
|
But Hotseat is much easier to code. Only thing they need is to have diplomacy screen modified for HORSEAT & PBEM.
No need for CHAT screens, simultanious gameplay code, various protocols for network play, etc.
I remember playing CIV2 HOTSEAT with original Civ2 disc.
All I needed was a hack file, which modified a savegame, by replacing bit
for AI with a bit for human player. Although diplomacy didn't worked,
we excanged technologies with cheat editor.
Anyway we had a great time.
Personally I think that they will:
-Give as a game without MP, and then give Hotseat & PBEM with PATCH or
-Give as a game initialy with Hotseat & PBEM (no other MP), and give as
other multiplayer options with expansion pack
|
|
|
|
October 10, 2001, 03:47
|
#8
|
Emperor
Local Time: 09:24
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In the army
Posts: 3,375
|
player1
i was more making an observation than an assetment of the difficulty in adding PBEM/hotseat
if civ3 doesn't have MP then that includes PBEM/hotseat, lan, ip, etc
if it has one of those features then it has MP
|
|
|
|
October 10, 2001, 04:17
|
#9
|
Emperor
Local Time: 16:24
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 3,218
|
Yes, you ara right.
But, only thinh we know about MP is when some guy (I don't remember the name) asked Friaxis to give hime a free copies of CIV3 so he could make a use of them in his experiment on his LAN (something about difference in play between humans & AI).
Then Firaxis replayed that that part of game won't be finished before next year.
But, that dosn't mean that some othen types of MP (like PBEM or HOTEST) won't be finished if LAN play is not.
|
|
|
|
October 10, 2001, 07:50
|
#10
|
Prince
Local Time: 08:24
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America
Posts: 359
|
I don't want hotseat or direct-connect -- they all suck for MP. Here's hoping for something new: http://apolyton.net/forums/Forum28/HTML/000343.html#5
|
|
|
|
October 10, 2001, 08:01
|
#11
|
King
Local Time: 14:24
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Uni of Wales Swansea
Posts: 1,262
|
Hotseat better be in :madL
Its the best way of playing mulitplayer (for me anyhow).
|
|
|
|
October 10, 2001, 09:50
|
#12
|
Emperor
Local Time: 16:24
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 3,218
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by red_jon
Its the best way of playing mulitplayer (for me anyhow).
|
For me too!
Since I have only one Computer & my Internet connection is VERY BAD,
Hotseat is my ONLY good option (PBEM last too long).
|
|
|
|
October 10, 2001, 09:52
|
#13
|
Emperor
Local Time: 16:24
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 3,218
|
I would like beating up my brother in CIV3, like I did in CivNet & Civ2!
|
|
|
|
October 10, 2001, 10:00
|
#14
|
Emperor
Local Time: 10:24
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,361
|
Hmm, not really a turn based game then, eh?
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24.
|
|