Thread Tools
Old October 12, 2001, 03:39   #61
LaRusso
King
 
LaRusso's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: appendix of Europe
Posts: 1,634
if i see one more polish vote, i'll go bananas
LaRusso is offline  
Old October 12, 2001, 04:09   #62
Solmyr
Warlord
 
Local Time: 16:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 144
My extra 20 votes go to the Hungarians.
Solmyr is offline  
Old October 12, 2001, 04:39   #63
Brad
Settler
 
Brad's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 22
Since my votes weren't counted I'll try again
Australia 20
Mongols 20
Huns 15
Incas 15
Vikings 20
Turks 10
Brad is offline  
Old October 12, 2001, 05:44   #64
Grumbold
Emperor
 
Grumbold's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,732
My votes

Spanish 20
Scots 20
Swedes 20
Swiss 20
Dutch 20
Portugese 20
Turks 20
Arabs 20
__________________
To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection. H.Poincare
Grumbold is offline  
Old October 12, 2001, 07:09   #65
Locutus
Apolytoners Hall of FameCiv4 SP Democracy GameCiv4 InterSite DG: Apolyton TeamBtS Tri-LeagueC4BtSDG TemplarsC4WDG Team ApolytonCivilization IV CreatorsCTP2 Source Code ProjectPolyCast Team
Deity
 
Locutus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: De Hel van Enschede
Posts: 11,702
Gramphos,
Hehe I'll contact Markos about it but this time I can't guarantee he'll listen: last time I sent him a PM he blatantly ignored me. Now, it's not unusual for Markos to ignore people but to my recollection that's the first time ever he ignored *me*
Re: bars:

Trifna,
SE Asian culture was to a certain extend influenced by particularly India and to a lesser degree China but it is generally seen as an area that brought forth a great number of distinctly different (from each other and certainly from the world around them) civilizations, of which the Khmer are just one example.

Boney,
Thanks for clarifying that, I was not aware of that. Both civs will be added in the next update.

LaRusso,
Relax! It's not illegal for people to vote for the Polish... I agree that some of the votes here have been slightly suspicious but that doesn't have to mean anything. If things threaten to go out of control again I'll take steps to prevent that from happening, but for now I think it's okay: a quick count tells me that only something like a third of the people who voted in this new thread voted for Poles, no real need for concern (yet).
__________________
Administrator of WePlayCiv -- Civ5 Info Centre | Forum | Gallery
Locutus is offline  
Old October 12, 2001, 07:23   #66
campmajor!
Prince
 
campmajor!'s Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Zoetermeer, The Netherlands
Posts: 306
Pfew, talk about rules.txt....

It is a shame a poll like this needs so much rules.
But I guess it's inevitable and it makes it clearer.
campmajor! is offline  
Old October 12, 2001, 09:05   #67
pithorr
Chieftain
 
pithorr's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Katowice, Poland
Posts: 47
Quote:
Originally posted by LaRusso
if i see one more polish vote, i'll go bananas
So you must go...
My vote:
Spanish 20
Mongols 20
Arabs 20
Poles 20
pithorr is offline  
Old October 12, 2001, 09:18   #68
Be Quicker
Warlord
 
Be Quicker's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Zeeheldenkwartier
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally posted by pithorr

My vote:
Spanish 20
Mongols 20
Arabs 20
Poles 20
Jippie, an invalid polish vote!, isn't it? and there was much rejoicing. Or shouldn't he be warned. PS I am being somewhat of a Pot, towards a Polish Kettle.
Be Quicker is offline  
Old October 12, 2001, 09:21   #69
Gramphos
staff
Civilization III MultiplayerC4WDG Team ApolytonCivilization IV: MultiplayerAge of Nations TeamC4BtSDG Realms BeyondCivilization IV Creators
Technical Director
 
Gramphos's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chalmers, Sweden
Posts: 9,294
Locutus,
Don't you think Markos would like to see a ranking with bars?

The thread I started about the codes are here. (I hoped to get some people interested in helping me convince Markos about it. Maybe should have sent a PM)
And Markos actually added both my Civ3-Avatars, and my 3 banned smiles, but he don't do anything that would take time to do. But as far as I know adding a BB-code is very simple, and can be done in less then five minutes. (I've actually written everything he needs in that thread. He just have to do some copy and paste.)
__________________
ACS - Technical Director
Gramphos is offline  
Old October 12, 2001, 13:06   #70
JonahFalcon
Prince
 
Local Time: 14:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: New York, NY USA
Posts: 352
My belated votes
My votes:

1. Spaniards
2. Byzantine
3. Mongols
4. Turks
5. Vikings
6. Portuguese

The rest are pretty average.

What noted conquerors the Polish are - just ask Germany and Russia.
JonahFalcon is offline  
Old October 12, 2001, 14:02   #71
Oerdin
Deity
 
Oerdin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: In a bamboo forest hiding from Dale.
Posts: 17,436
Quote:
Originally posted by Grumbold
My votes

Spanish 20
Scots 20
Swedes 20
Swiss 20
Dutch 20
Portugese 20
Turks 20
Arabs 20
Yeah! More points for the Scots! :-)
Oerdin is offline  
Old October 12, 2001, 14:02   #72
pithorr
Chieftain
 
pithorr's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Katowice, Poland
Posts: 47
Quote:
My vote:
Spanish 20
Mongols 20
Arabs 20
Poles 20
Quote:
Originally posted by Be Quicker
Jippie, an invalid polish vote!, isn't it? and there was much rejoicing. Or shouldn't he be warned. PS I am being somewhat of a Pot, towards a Polish Kettle.
Hrrrghh!!!
How could I miss it? So sophisticated rules...
OK - Add:
5 for Dutch
5 for Turks
Now is it OK?
pithorr is offline  
Old October 12, 2001, 15:04   #73
Trifna
King
 
Trifna's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: of anchovies
Posts: 1,478
Little changing
I want to change a little something to my vote. I went reading a little on "Polynesians", Khmers and Aborigines. To who would like to get a not-too-bad source, go see on Encarta. Or even better I think: Britannica encyclopedia (www.britannica.com).

I concluded that Khmers, "Polynesians" and Aborigines were all three distinctive cultures, distinctive enough from others to make me say they are in the History's general cultural types. I also was very unsure about Hebrews/Jews, since what was initialy the Hebrew civ fell and at that time wasn't very big (historically, it is said that they weren't a major civ as the ones around). But as many civs, it stayed culturally, even if not in a specific territory (more in some place, less somewhere else). So the reason why I'd include them is for a cultural factor, because that they are perfectly distinctive even if Hebrews never been as Babylon, Egypt, France or Zulus. And they still are on the planet, even if mostly expanded everywhere (with a new territory, of course). As same as some other civs are little weak scientifically and everything but strong at some other stuff (Zulus, Iroquois, "Polynesians").


So here are the changes to my vote, based on the information I got:


Aborigines 8 (+8)
Khmers 12 (+12)
Polynesians (or the name that would define them) 10 (+10)
Hebrews/Jews 14 (+14)

Arabs 17 (-3)
Spanish 17 (-3)
Mongol 17 (-3)
Goths 17 (-3)
Celts 15 (-3)
Viking 12 (-3)
Algonquiens 12 (they are the other cultural type of native Amerindians with Iroquois. I include Inuits in Algonquiens)
Carthage 9 (-2)
Trifna is offline  
Old October 12, 2001, 18:11   #74
Myrddin
Warlord
 
Myrddin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Aberystwyth
Posts: 232
Poles 20
Maori 20
Turks 20
Viking 20
Welsh 20
Carthaginians 20
Koreans 20
Californians 20
Myrddin is offline  
Old October 13, 2001, 08:43   #75
ogotai
Settler
 
ogotai's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: POLAND, Lodz
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally posted by LaRusso
if i see one more polish vote, i'll go bananas
Are you Czech, Hungarian, Slav, Ukrainian, Latvian..?



Ok, my old wotes were:

Poles 20
Spanish 10
Portugese 10

To make my wotes valid I add:

Latvians 20 - it's my tribute for our countries history
Austro/Hungary 20
Carthaginians 20
Ukrainians 10
Inca 10
Irish 10
Turks/Ottomans 10
Czech 5
Slavs 5


Galactic Emperials (Star Wars) 5 - I couldn't resist I like them to

Spanish +10 = 20

TOTAL: 160

I'm sure, that I will play Civ3 with Poles civ, despite of someone in this forum...
__________________
Ogotai
ogotai is offline  
Old October 13, 2001, 08:47   #76
kinglemming
Settler
 
Local Time: 22:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1
I'm new here.
Here are my votes.

Koreans 20
Inca 20
Maya 20
Inuit 20
Polynesians 20
Arabs 20
Mongol 20
Hebrew/Jews 20
kinglemming is offline  
Old October 13, 2001, 09:28   #77
Va-Toran
Settler
 
Local Time: 14:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 22
A few alterations, although I said I wouldn't use up my spare points I have decided that I will.

Mongols -5

Arabs +10
Mali +5

The altered post reads as follows:
20 points - Arabs, Spanish, Turks
15 points - Hapsburgs, Mongols, Vikings
10 points - Inca, Dutch, Phoenicians, Portugese
5 Points - Assyrians, Celts, Mali,

While a good geographic spread is desirable we must not let this dictate which Civs to include, We should try to Combine Simliar Civs wherever possible, because of this, The Byzantines do not deserve to be in the expansion pack, despite their cultural importance, as they were basically a continuation of the Roman Empire, with a larger greek influence.
Va-Toran is offline  
Old October 13, 2001, 12:18   #78
lockstep
Apolyton University
King
 
lockstep's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 1,529
Quote:
Originally posted by Va-Toran
While a good geographic spread is desirable we must not let this dictate which Civs to include, We should try to Combine Simliar Civs wherever possible, because of this, The Byzantines do not deserve to be in the expansion pack, despite their cultural importance, as they were basically a continuation of the Roman Empire, with a larger greek influence.
Couldn´t agree more about the Byzantines. And speaking of similar civs, I don´t think it´s necessary to include the Spanish and the Portugese.
__________________
"As far as general advice on mod-making: Go slow as far as adding new things to the game until you have the basic game all smoothed out ... Make sure the things you change are really imbalances and not just something that doesn't fit with your particular style of play." - WesW
lockstep is offline  
Old October 13, 2001, 15:47   #79
Jay Bee
staff
Spanish CiversApolytoners Hall of Fame
Moderator
 
Jay Bee's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Valladolid, CA
Posts: 11,884
lockstep, understandable and historically very reasonable but, would you like Austria and Germany lumped together? (sorry I could not help it).
Jay Bee is offline  
Old October 13, 2001, 16:20   #80
Drake Tungsten
Deity
 
Drake Tungsten's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In the closet...
Posts: 10,604
Quote:
Originally posted by LaRusso
if i see one more polish vote, i'll go bananas
I'm with you.
__________________
KH FOR OWNER!
ASHER FOR CEO!!
GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!
Drake Tungsten is offline  
Old October 13, 2001, 19:16   #81
lockstep
Apolyton University
King
 
lockstep's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 1,529
Quote:
Originally posted by Jay Bee
lockstep, understandable and historically very reasonable but, would you like Austria and Germany lumped together? (sorry I could not help it).
Jay Bee, I didn´t assign any points to Austria in my vote.

Seriously, Europe is over-represented in the top 16 IMO. I´d rather like to see the Polynesians, Malians or Khmer in an expansion pack than the Portugese, Austrians or Hungarians.
__________________
"As far as general advice on mod-making: Go slow as far as adding new things to the game until you have the basic game all smoothed out ... Make sure the things you change are really imbalances and not just something that doesn't fit with your particular style of play." - WesW
lockstep is offline  
Old October 14, 2001, 02:03   #82
Spathi
Settler
 
Local Time: 06:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Posts: 13
My votes
Here are my votes. By the way, what exactly is the difference between Zulus and Zimbabwe?

I agree that, regardless of historical significance, we should try to stay away from Europe in the expansion, so here are my votes.

80 Singapore
80 California

(j/k)

Here are my REAL votes:

20 Polynesia
20 Mali
20 Incas
20 Inuit/Eskimo
20 Ethiopia (or whatever that other name was)
20 Cambodians/Khmer
20 Korea
20 Austro-Hungarian Empire/Austria (Yes, they're European, but they're incredibly cool)
__________________
PLEASE don't smack me!
-Niffiwan, Spathi Regent
Spathi is offline  
Old October 14, 2001, 02:03   #83
Oerdin
Deity
 
Oerdin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: In a bamboo forest hiding from Dale.
Posts: 17,436
Quote:
Originally posted by lockstep
Seriously, Europe is over-represented in the top 16 IMO. I´d rather like to see the Polynesians, Malians or Khmer in an expansion pack than the Portugese, Austrians or Hungarians.
Over represented or not I say we vote for the best civ and then let the chips fall where they may. Malians & Khmers just don't compare to Portugese, Dutch, or Austrians. Sad but true.
Oerdin is offline  
Old October 14, 2001, 02:33   #84
Drake Tungsten
Deity
 
Drake Tungsten's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In the closet...
Posts: 10,604
Quote:
Originally posted by Oerdin
Over represented or not I say we vote for the best civ and then let the chips fall where they may. Malians & Khmers just don't compare to Portugese, Dutch, or Austrians. Sad but true.
It is true that Europe was, as a whole, more influential in our history. But I don't think Civ has ever been meant as a historical game; it is a game that allows history to be rewritten. If you set time back to 4000 BC and started it up again, the Khmer could very well end up as a world power. That's what I like about Civ, you get the chance to change history. Realism is good to a point, but when it starts to encroach on the actual fun of the game then it has gone too far. 10 civs in Europe would not be fun, IMHO, but civs spread out all over the world would be. It it's realism vs. fun, I'll take fun any day.
__________________
KH FOR OWNER!
ASHER FOR CEO!!
GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!
Drake Tungsten is offline  
Old October 14, 2001, 03:26   #85
JellyDonut
Prince
 
JellyDonut's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Köln, Deutschland
Posts: 500
Drake's right. Civilization is one big "What if?" Being a fan of AH (alternate history), I like that Civ gives me a chance to see what might have been but wasn't. What if the Zulus took over the world? What if the Aztecs conquered interstellar travel? What if the Sioux took over the United States? These notions are entertained by a game like civ. If things had gone a very different way, the Europeans may not have ended up the most influential group of civilizations in the world. The Polynesian empire may have settled the entire Pacific Rim and used Taiwan to launch the first spacecraft. Or the Malians could have established a huge African Empire and taken over Eurasia with a massive army. With Civ, you establish what would have happened, not what did.
__________________
"Proletarier aller Länder, vereinigt euch!" -- Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels
"If you expect a kick in the balls and get a slap in the face, that's a victory." -- Irish proverb

Proud member of the Pink Knights of the Roundtable!
JellyDonut is offline  
Old October 14, 2001, 07:51   #86
Wernazuma III
Spanish CiversCivilization III PBEMNationStates
Emperor
 
Wernazuma III's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,512
Quote:
Originally posted by Oerdin
Over represented or not I say we vote for the best civ and then let the chips fall where they may. Malians & Khmers just don't compare to Portugese, Dutch, or Austrians. Sad but true.
I'm austrian, I like Austria. NTL, Austria was never too important , even less an own civilization. The Habsburgs were important more in Spain or with the combination Austria/Spain. And, although there are certainly cultural differences with germany because of the Multiethnicity of the Empire, but it seems to be a variant of german culture to me.
Yes, Austria was a political power in europe for centuries, but so was Mali in Africa. The Khmer maybe in comparison weren't so politically important, but both Mali and Khmer have far more unique culture as Austria has.
Remark: I'd like to have both Austrians and Mali in, personally I don't care for the Khmer (yes, I know Angkor-Vat)
__________________
"The world is too small in Vorarlberg". Austrian ex-vice-chancellor Hubert Gorbach in a letter to Alistar [sic] Darling, looking for a job...
"Let me break this down for you, fresh from algebra II. A 95% chance to win 5 times means a (95*5) chance to win = 475% chance to win." Wiglaf, Court jester or hayseed, you judge.
Wernazuma III is offline  
Old October 14, 2001, 11:24   #87
Locutus
Apolytoners Hall of FameCiv4 SP Democracy GameCiv4 InterSite DG: Apolyton TeamBtS Tri-LeagueC4BtSDG TemplarsC4WDG Team ApolytonCivilization IV CreatorsCTP2 Source Code ProjectPolyCast Team
Deity
 
Locutus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: De Hel van Enschede
Posts: 11,702
Guys,
I wanted to update the summary but just before I was about to safe the changes my computer crashed As you can no doubt understand I don't feel like immediately doing the whole thing all over again but I think I'll update later tonight.

Spathi,
The difference between Zulu and Zimbabwe is quite simple. The Zulu were a small tribe that lived in villages and lived off the land, like hundreds of other insignificant tribes. The only thing that made them stand out is that, just around the time when the English and the Dutch arrived, they happened to have conquered a few neighbouring tribes and occupied a territroy somewhat larger than that of the average African tribe (they controlled an area perhaps as large as Switzerland or Portugal, not quite sure) and for a while they formed an quite an annoyance to the colonists, but nothing more. Zimbabwe OTOH was a full-flegded civilization that for centuries controlled a large empire (roughly the same size as Nazi Germany just before the invasion of Russia) deep in the inlands of Africa, they lived in large cities, built magnificent structures (most famous example: the Great Zimbabwe) and traded intensively with Swahili, Indians, Chinese and Arabs. In short, the Zulu were a tribe, Zimbabwe was a civilization. Since they both came from roughly the same region of Africa it's IMHO a total joke that Firaxis (and Microprose before that) included the Zulu as a civilization instead of the Zimbabwe and gave them a city list with some cities from Zimbabwe on it.

Oerdin,
You don't know much about the Mali and the Khmer, do you? If so, before you draw conclusions like that, you should keep in mind that your lack of knowlegde of certain civs says a lot more about you than it says about those civs. One could indeed argue that the Dutch, and the Portuguese (like Wernazuma, I'm not so sure about the Austrians) were historically more important than the Mali or the Khmer, but to state that the latter could not even compare to European civs is a severe underestimation of the greatness of these civilizations. I dare argue that both the Mali and the Khmer were in fact greater civilizations than the Dutch or the Portuguese. The only reason why the Europeans are always seen as so important is because they preferred waging war and suppressing other nations over developing a sophisticated society, building magnificent cities and structures and collecting knowlegde (and with 'collecting' I don't mean 'borrowing' it from others). I absolutely agree that war and conquest are important means to achieve greatness but they are certainly not the only ones. Greatness of a civ should not solely be measured by the amount of territory it occupied and/or the amount of time that is dedicated to it in the average highschool (or even college) history class...
__________________
Administrator of WePlayCiv -- Civ5 Info Centre | Forum | Gallery
Locutus is offline  
Old October 14, 2001, 12:11   #88
Gramphos
staff
Civilization III MultiplayerC4WDG Team ApolytonCivilization IV: MultiplayerAge of Nations TeamC4BtSDG Realms BeyondCivilization IV Creators
Technical Director
 
Gramphos's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chalmers, Sweden
Posts: 9,294
Sad to hear that

How's the progress convincing Mark to add those codes? I've PMed him, he have read the PM, but nothing more.
__________________
ACS - Technical Director
Gramphos is offline  
Old October 14, 2001, 12:12   #89
Droximus
Settler
 
Local Time: 09:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 14
I've been lurking for about two weeks now, and this is the first thread that I've found that actually might be worthwhile....(good job Locutus)

All my choices get 10 points...

Arabs
Dutch
Etruscans
Hungary
Inca
Iroquois-revised
Israelis
Mayans
Mongols
Ottoman
Phoenicians
Polynesians
Portuguese
Spanish
Sioux
Vikings
Droximus is offline  
Old October 14, 2001, 14:13   #90
Oerdin
Deity
 
Oerdin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: In a bamboo forest hiding from Dale.
Posts: 17,436
Quote:
Originally posted by Drake Tungsten


It is true that Europe was, as a whole, more influential in our history. But I don't think Civ has ever been meant as a historical game; it is a game that allows history to be rewritten. If you set time back to 4000 BC and started it up again, the Khmer could very well end up as a world power. That's what I like about Civ, you get the chance to change history.
I don't disagree; Civ3 isn't a historical simulator and I have never implied that it should be. I simply feel that if we are going to choice 32 civs to represent all of humanity we should choice the 32 that where most influential in history, that created the largest cultural legendcy, and contributed most scientific advancement. I see little point in trying to be politically correct and balancing so many civs from this continent and so many from that continent. Let us simply find a criteria which we can use to fairly and evenly judge the accomplishments of one civ against those of another. That way we won't have the injustice of a 1st or 2nd rate power being bumped so that we can include some petty 3rd rate power who happens to come from the politically correct geographic area.
We should judge based on accomplishments and geographic distributions should be an after thought.

Quote:
Realism is good to a point, but when it starts to encroach on the actual fun of the game then it has gone too far. 10 civs in Europe would not be fun, IMHO, but civs spread out all over the world would be. It it's realism vs. fun, I'll take fun any day.
The vast majority of games will not be on a world map so this is a false dilemma. I am not sure but I suspect the game will only support eight civs at a time any way so trying to play all of them at one time on a single map won't be a real concern.
Oerdin is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:25.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team