Thread Tools
Old October 11, 2001, 01:22   #61
korn469
Emperor
 
korn469's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In the army
Posts: 3,375
on a personal note, the lack of MP won't be devistating to me, because i don't have the time to devote myself to PBEM, and my internet connection requires alot of patience to play an ip game

however, i really do wish most of you would at least admit that multiplayer is a fairly important part of a strategy game

people can name a million and one games that are highly successful and don't include MP at all, but the vast majority of those games aren't strategy games...can anyone really make a list of ten single player only strategy games that have done phenominally in the past four years?

here is what we know

*May 1999, firaxis announces Civ3 at E3 with BR as the lead designer
*December 1999, BR quits and takes the core of the Civ3 team with him

so after seven months of working on Civ3, firaxis has to start all over again basically from scratch

so firaxis has been working on civ3 for only about 21 months, instead of 28

we also know that Jeff Morris wanted to conduct an open beta, but said their wasn't time for one
we also know that there wasn't time for a demo
and MP got cut out

we do not know if these changes allowed firaxis enough time to develop and ship a high quality program

i am going to give Civ3 the benefit of the doubt, because none of us here know if it will be as good or as bad as what some people are saying

all i'm saying i am prepared for the worst, but i am hoping for the best, and i am tired of of the following argument

civ3 sux!
no it doesn't!
yes it does!
no way man!
civ3 is the worst game i have ever played (in my mind)!
no way civ3 is the best game ever!
time to die
no you die!


we don't know yet!
so lets call a truce till the game comes out
then we can really spill blood
korn469 is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 01:38   #62
GamesMun
Settler
 
Local Time: 14:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5
First, I'm very disappointed in most the SP comments on here. If the game had only come out with MP, I would have been so upset on the SP's behalf; I would even wanted to wait for the game to come out so the "other half" of our gaming family could enjoy the game as it was meant to be. But NO, not only could most SP's care less, they are making rude jives towards MP's.

Quote:
If you're really a hardcore MP, then you can wait. You probably don't want to get a half-written implementation anyway.
No, If YOU were a hardcore CIV fan, you could wait till the fully written implementation of the game (including MP) comes out.

Multiplayer is standard in this day and age, and it's just plain inexcusable that it will not be included. No patch or upgrade can possibly do any type of descent job of adding MP. No AI can match the thrill, unpredictability, and fun of play against or with other humans. I, and my group of 8 friends/family that plays games together have promised never to buy CIV III until (if ever) a stable MP is available (FREE).

So to the rude SP's out there; forgive us if we have actual friends, and families, and Lans, and LIVES that include really living human beings to play with and against! Maybe that's why there's less MP's on this board now; they are spending time with HUMANS!
GamesMun is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 01:49   #63
SITS
King
 
SITS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: of shreds and patches
Posts: 1,771
I think some people are missing the point here. They say that it is better to have a SP game than one that includes a half-arsed MP which, to me doesn't make sense. What Firaxis should do is produce a complete game not half of one. A complete game has both SP and MP options, both well written and that cater for both types of players. They have chosen not to at the expense of MP. They still haven't written it up on the official site, they still haven't given an explanation for the half the game missing. That is shoddy and a terrible way to treat their customers. But hey does it matter? I will still buy the game and the worst thing about that for me is that I wish I had strength of yin not to buy the game and it shames me that I don't. This has left a nasty taste in my mouth.

As to the SPers rejoicing I suggest you imagine Firaxis releasing Civ3 without SP but just MP. How would you feel then?
__________________
'No room for human error, and really it's thousands of times safer than letting drivers do it. But the one in ten million has come up once again, and the the cause of the accident is sits, something in the silicon.' - The Gold Coast - Kim Stanley Robinson

'Feels just like I can take a thousand miles in my stride hey yey' - Oh, Baby - Rhianna
SITS is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 02:03   #64
SITS
King
 
SITS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: of shreds and patches
Posts: 1,771
Sorry, a lot of what I said cross-posted with GamesMan...
__________________
'No room for human error, and really it's thousands of times safer than letting drivers do it. But the one in ten million has come up once again, and the the cause of the accident is sits, something in the silicon.' - The Gold Coast - Kim Stanley Robinson

'Feels just like I can take a thousand miles in my stride hey yey' - Oh, Baby - Rhianna
SITS is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 02:15   #65
mjs0
Settler
 
Local Time: 10:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 22
Wow, after lurking for who knows how many years (predates the Apolyton merger for sure) something finally piqued my interest enough to post...I started playing Civ1 on a Commodore Amiga (5+ minutes to create and populate a map!) almost 10 years ago and have passed through all the subsequent iterations/imitations including the CTPs and SMAC. I have already pre-ordered the CivIII LE.

Let me start by saying that I do bemoan the lack of multiplayer. My wife ( ), children and I play many many MP games on our home LAN from SMAC to Baldur's Gate and we are disappointed (not devastated/annoyed/suicidal or even mildly irritated , just disappointed ) that we will not get this functionality in the initial release.

I have worked in the software industry for over 20 years (although not PC games unfortunately) for several companies both small and large in positions varying from QA to programmer to architect all the way up to V.P. of development (a thankless job) and I have observed the following behaviour many times...

Even without the unprecedented level of future customer input represented by the CivIII list, the designers/developers of a product always have far more features and neat ideas ( ) than can possibly be implemented in a single release cycle. They (the good guys) will argue that the development time or available resources should be expanded to allow as much as possible to be done. On the other side sit the beancounters (the bad guys) who remind the designer/developer types that their salaries are not being pulled from thin air and that at some point the product they are developing needs to show an ROI (return on investment).
The solution is inevitably a compromise that sees the product shipped with less functionality than the development team would ideally want to see. The idea is typically to continue with some level of development effort working towards the next version/release/patch, and whether these efforts continue to completion is inevitably influenced by the success or failure of the initial release from a financial perspective.

(Background Notes:
1. There are only so many degrees of freedom in software development, typically these are time, resources, quality and functionality. Time and resources are typically controlled by the beancounters and are thus almost invariably non-negotiable (unless you have in your possession a suitably compromising picture of the appropriate beancounter taken at the last office party), quality and functionality are then in the hands of the development team)
2. The nature of beancounters (often referred to as suits in some industries such as TV): These are often perfectly nice friendly human beings when observed in a non-work situation, but when exercising power in the workplace they are ruthless dictators . Their sole goal is to use all the knowledge at their disposal to enable the company to turn a profit and provide investors with a decent return on their investment. This often results in tactical rather than strategic thinking
/Background Notes)

In the case of CivIII I would suggest that there would have been a decision point early on in the development cycle (although I seriously doubt it was formally considered as such or that much thought would have been required if it were) that said:
"Look this game has to be released in plenty of time for Xmas 2001, given that the continuation of this project will depend on the sales of the initial version should we release it as
(a) A great SP game only with a goal of releasing MP support later
(b) A great MP game only with a goal of releasing SP support later
(c) A game with both SP and MP but neither to the level of quality that development or customers would ideally want to see"
Of course I have grossly simplified the options but the important point here is which of these options will maximize short term (tactical) sales in order to allow long term (strategic) delivery of all the functionality the customers want.
Unfortunately for those of us that are waiting for multiplayer the only logical decision is (a) {Hey you...yes you, the one who is about to argue that this last point is not true, if you don't believe me I can't help you, but I think there are support groups for people suffering from denial of this kind, so don't give up hope. (ducks) } . Of course this decision is going to disappoint (or anger in some cases) many people so nobody really wants to tell anyone, especially the development team who get forced into making these tough decisions and even less the beancounters who having imposed their will on the powerless developers have already forgotten why they made the decision.
One unfortunate side effect of this is that boycotting the product just 'proves' the beancounter right (in their own perverse world of financial logic) and reduces the chance of ever seeing the product completed as the designers truly intended.

Phew that post was longer than I originally intended and I am not really sure it added that much to the debate. Those that are mad at Firaxis will continue to be mad and those that are happy or ambivalent will probably be reading the next post by this point.
Ah well, the point of these forums is to allow everyone to have a say so this was mine.

...Slinks back into the distant oort cloud of lurkers having spent his brief moment in the sunlight, perhaps never to return...
mjs0 is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 02:18   #66
player1
Emperor
 
player1's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 3,218
I WANT A HOTSEAT!!!!!!!!!
player1 is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 02:21   #67
player1
Emperor
 
player1's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 3,218
P.S.
Relly it's to easier to code HOTSET compared to other types of MP
You need only stratup & diplomacy screen.

I hope there will be civ3hack (ala civ2) wich will allowe "some sort" of
HOTSEAT.
player1 is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 02:35   #68
d4rkl0rd
Settler
 
Local Time: 06:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 21
mjs0,

Your points are well taken. I too work in the software development industry, and face these decisions all too often. I think that one of the key points here is that the a/b/c alternatives you laid out were a bit over-simplified in this way: really, there was tons of functionality added, and MP was one piece out of /many/ that was deprioritized (btw I agree that SP was non-negotiable). My assertion is that MP is not just another feature like adding unique units or a diplomatic win. It's far more important than either of those. It /could/ have been included (considering the ~2 year development period), leaving others to be added as an XP, but historical precedent for making this particular feature an add-on likely gave them a defensable position for releasing it seperately and for extra $$$.

Quote:
Originally posted by mjs0
Wow, after lurking for who knows how many years (predates the Apolyton merger for sure) something finally piqued my interest enough to post...I started playing Civ1 on a Commodore Amiga (5+ minutes to create and populate a map!) almost 10 years ago and have passed through all the subsequent iterations/imitations including the CTPs and SMAC. I have already pre-ordered the CivIII LE.

<...snip...>

...Slinks back into the distant oort cloud of lurkers having spent his brief moment in the sunlight, perhaps never to return...
d4rkl0rd is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 02:56   #69
SITS
King
 
SITS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: of shreds and patches
Posts: 1,771
Wonderful post mjs0! And welcome to the boards - careful you don't get sucked in...

I really dislike your post as it smacks of reality! I agree with the points you make but I do believe Firaxis could have acted in a more 'honourable' way and been upfront about it. They haven't (and they knew for a while as proven by the leaked email) and have ignored the many questions about MP. This to me smacks of foul play, especially as inforgames proclaim in a press release how wonderful pre-sales are. It just ain't cricket, know what I mean?

Please post some more doses of reality, especially one as well written as that.
__________________
'No room for human error, and really it's thousands of times safer than letting drivers do it. But the one in ten million has come up once again, and the the cause of the accident is sits, something in the silicon.' - The Gold Coast - Kim Stanley Robinson

'Feels just like I can take a thousand miles in my stride hey yey' - Oh, Baby - Rhianna
SITS is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 03:14   #70
yin26
inmate
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Born Again Optimist
 
yin26's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: This space reserved for Darkstar.
Posts: 5,667
mjs0: Your calm and reasoned view will only likely cause riots around here.

Quote:
Yin26 is heard softly chuckling in the background. Mwahahaha!
Not chuckingling...just *deep sigh*-ing.

My take on this is as follows:
  1. No matter if you play MP or don't, the fact that Firaxis kept this under their hats when they KNEW about it as far back as Kelly's 'leaked' e-mail completely ruins Firaxis' credibility on ANY announcements regarding planned patches and future versions of the game. Period.
  2. I am not necessarily against the decision to delay MP *if* that allows for a better SP and *if* MP is released later for free...however, #1 is so disturbing, that I really don't feel like giving Firaxis any of my money at any point. "Your loss, Yin!" Sure. Whatever.
  3. But rest assured that if Firaxis is capable of #1, they'll also be capable under thier 'evil' publisher (whom THEY signed with) to try to make MP part of another product you have to pay for. I can only hope that if that were to happen that people would see Firaxis in a clear light.

Bottom Line: They used MP to hype up sales of the game. They then willingly kept the truth from us to protect their pre-orders. And still there is no Firaxis statement to address this issue.

Talk about the most piss-poor, stick your head in the sand, screw your public attitude. It sickens me, actually.
__________________
I've been on these boards for a long time and I still don't know what to think when it comes to you -- FrantzX, December 21, 2001

"Yin": Your friendly, neighborhood negative cosmic force.
yin26 is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 03:21   #71
LaRusso
King
 
LaRusso's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: appendix of Europe
Posts: 1,634
great posts!

i am perfectly aware of the financial constraints and it is understandable that good civ3 sales will let them work on support for up to a year. there was even a column on apolyton on this topic and someone (also ex-industry guy) explained how business decisions are being made (it was about CtP disaster).

It is too late now to whine and flame suits(beans) - they are shipping SP. I preordered my LE being 99% sure that there would be no MP (not a single word on it 1 month before release). THe next question is - will they charge us for it, and, if yes, will they charge us a lot? By 'a lot' I mean anything over 10 dollars. This, again, I am aware, will be decided by suits. we can all envisage the outcome (a MP expansion disk with a couple of scenarios for around 25 USD).

now i am pissed as much as the next guy when having to part with my hard-earned ( ) cash but the market economy gives us all a wonderful option of spending those USD 75 total on something else. if civ 3 is pants and the follow-up patches (there have to be some) are dodgy, i will not waste my time on buying MP. however, suits are not THAT stupid. i reckon they will understand that additional profit may be squeezed only if the after-release support is really good. we'll see....
LaRusso is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 03:28   #72
Alexander's Horse
Civilization II MultiplayerApolytoners Hall of Fame
Deity
 
Alexander's Horse's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:26
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: In a tunnel under the DMZ
Posts: 12,273
I really think they made a PR boo boo
I know some people here say MP doesn't matter etc. etc. but I really think Infogames/Firaxis has made a big PR/marketing boo boo by not including MP - at least in some form.

The multiplayer community, in its many forms, is large, articulate and vocal. Sure, you can exagerate their influence but at the same time you can't discount their influence on perceptions of the game either.

If I buy this game as SP, I'm sure I'm going to die of frustration because I'll want to MP. Since I started MP I never played another SP game of civ II.

I really would have preferred an unadventurous MP set up to no MP at all. If they came out with an enhanced Mp setup later I'd probably be quite happy to buy the game again. But not an SP version and then an MP version (if it ever comes out).

Hopefully MP code will be a present somewhere in the SP and it will just be a matter of finding it, like the way someone, Markusf I think, found the simult mode, which we now all play in civ II
__________________
Any views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer.

Look, I just don't anymore, okay?
Alexander's Horse is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 03:39   #73
LaRusso
King
 
LaRusso's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: appendix of Europe
Posts: 1,634
AH, so are you buying the SP version at all? (until MP comes out)
LaRusso is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 03:41   #74
Deathwalker
Prince
 
Deathwalker's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 671
I dont mind if I have to wait a while to get MP
After all this way we get the game earlyier and that never did Civ 2 any harm.
__________________
I have walked since the dawn of time and were ever I walk, death is sure to follow. As surely as night follows day.
Deathwalker is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 03:55   #75
Alexander's Horse
Civilization II MultiplayerApolytoners Hall of Fame
Deity
 
Alexander's Horse's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:26
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: In a tunnel under the DMZ
Posts: 12,273
To be honest I haven't decided
Quote:
Originally posted by LaRusso
AH, so are you buying the SP version at all? (until MP comes out)
I hate to admit it but it will be hard to resist - especially if its good and a few of my MP buddies get it. They'll be taking the game apart piece by piece to find the best strats and it will be hard not to be part of that. Especially if that's all people are talking about on icq.

But I will still probably hang back to see if its a dog or not and if the platform is stable. If I buy it will probably be version 3.1 or whatever.
__________________
Any views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer.

Look, I just don't anymore, okay?
Alexander's Horse is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 03:58   #76
mjs0
Settler
 
Local Time: 10:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 22
d4rkl0rd,
I cannot disagree with your assertion that MP is far more important than many of the more cosmetic or esoteric features that apparently have made it into the gold cut. However as you point out it is this very importance that makes it an obvious candidate for postponement to the beancounters (i.e. it is sufficiently desirable to be worth paying for separately).
My guess is that the product has been architected with the goal of MP as a clear and immutable goal. All the low level hooks to enable MP at the object-interface level in the game engine are probably there, the careful design required to expose the MP functionality correctly (i.e. the way it should play) and the amount of time it would take to test it adequately are the things that probably got traded for the tactically more lucrative SP-only first release.

SITS,
Cricket, Cricket?!? how did you know?. (You got me...I'm a British import)
Dr mjs0 says - Take two doses of reality a day and we'll soon cure you of that optimism thing.
You're right the way Firaxis handled the PR was abysmal, but I would encourage people to understand that there is a world of difference between incompetence or indifference and malice. In practical terms other than the bad blood it creates on this site and other of its ilk it will probably have very little impact on sales. Unless you are part of a tight knit community such as Apolyton or lucky enough to have immediate friends and family who share your interest in Civ you are unlikely to discover the joys of multiplayer. Unless Firaxis has something truly unexpected up their sleeves SP will be the primary source of revenue, just don't tell the beancounters until the MP support is finished.

Yin26,
Not much to say except I understand where you are coming from and agree with much of what you say. We all have the choice in a free world of voting with our wallets on the behaviour of corporations. I would have preferred Firaxis/Infogrames had been more honest wrt the MP situation but I am not strong willed enough to deny myself my CivIII fix in order to make a point. I applaud your stance as I would anyone who takes a stand on a point of personal conviction. Given that we have to wait several months for MP then if, as I suspect, it is an expansion pack (i.e. not free) I will probably wait a little longer until it hits the bargain bins.
(I am dreaming {hint hint} that Firaxis/Infogrames will allow me to play MP on a LAN with an original CD in one of the machines and the ExpPack CD in the other) {Uh oh here comes reality }
mjs0 is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 04:43   #77
Imran Siddiqui
staff
Apolytoners Hall of FameAge of Nations TeamPolyCast Team
 
Imran Siddiqui's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: on the corner of Peachtree and Peachtree
Posts: 30,698
Quote:
they'll also be capable under thier 'evil' publisher (whom THEY signed with)
Uh... if they didn't sign with them, they couldn't make Civ3 AT ALL, seeing that Infogrames (Hasbro before) owned the rights to Civ3.
__________________
“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Imran Siddiqui is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 08:54   #78
Lee Johnson
Warlord
 
Lee Johnson's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 162
Quote:
Er never mind, an appropriate response would require some higher sensitivity on your part
LOL!

You know, I'm not entirely unsympathetic to the MP cause. I'm 43 years into a PBEM SMAC game, and I hope that I'll be able to do the same with Civ III eventually. But with Civ II and SMAC, I am overwhelmingly a solo player.

That said, I hope that Firaxis will stop waffling and make a definitive announcement about its MP plans soon.
Lee Johnson is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 09:14   #79
Ozymandous
Prince
 
Ozymandous's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 507
Quote:
Originally posted by Simpleton
I say no MP is a good sign from Firaxis. They held off on including an unfinished half-a$$ed MP version and decided to do it right! This shows a lot of class. They could have shot it out the door with a buggy uninspired MP like some companies (ie Craptivision -- CTP2) but they said no we want to make a good game!! RIGHT ON!! .
Sure it's disappointing for some not to have MP but wouldn't you rather have a good finished MP released in a couple months rather than something that doesn't work? I would.
And imagine the uproar if they had delayed Civ3 till the new year because MP wasn't done!!! Yikes! Then you would really have a MP vs SP player war.
I say thank you Firaxis for having the integrity to do it right!!!
The point is not necessarily that they aren't releasing MP with the game (at least for me) it's the fact that for months they had the chance to openly admit it and give fans time to blow off steam, etc.

Instead they sat on their hands not doing anything and pissing people off more because if the delay in nformation, etc. People feel disappointed and disillusioned by a company they had trust in to at least tlel them what was going on.

As for me, I am tired of buying a game, then having to buy an "expansion pack" 3-6 months later that finishes the game and a gold pack coming out 3-6 months after that for less than the cost of either game that has both.

As for them sending something out the door half finished, they could have sent it out the door finished and polished like Age of Kings or even Baldurs gate 2.

If they had to wait more months for the game, so what? It's only been 5 years I think a few more months for them to deliver the game the initially promised is not to long a wait.

By the way, showing class would be to admit features were cut, not to stay silent and hope that the issue would die off.

Classy = Quicksilver working on MOO3, they admit what they had to cut and why.
Not Classy = Firaxis, who accidentally leaked info on what was cut and then kept silent on the issue.

Guess who I respect more as a company (even though it is probably painful for them)? You guessed it, Quicksilver. At least they are open with the fans and don't think they know beeter than us what we like or don't like.
Ozymandous is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 10:29   #80
Th0mas
Civilization III Democracy Game
Warlord
 
Th0mas's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: London
Posts: 244
Mjs0 Thanks
Quote:
Originally posted by mjs0
Wow, after lurking for ...
..never to return...
Mjs0

I attempted to express the same on another thread ... but you did a much better job than me.....

.... What you have outlined defines how I feel about the whole MP issue...*to all those angry people* please take a reality check before you start shouting..the situation is much more complex than you think.


... Mjs0 Thanks
__________________
tis better to be thought stupid, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

6 years lurking, 5 minutes posting
Th0mas is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 10:44   #81
Ozymandous
Prince
 
Ozymandous's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 507
Complex situation? Maybe, but...
Adding MP may or may not be a complex issue, but the real question, IMHO, is why didn't Firaxis admit they had cut MP months ago when first asked about it?

Were they hoping to slide it in at the last minute? Release a quick patch when the game ships to add it in? What?

As many other have said, if they had admitted to cutting MP way back when people would have been upset, sure, but not as upset now as suddenly, in the 11th hour, they are told they have been lied to or if not lied to (although the advertising did say MP at one point) then deliberately given and kept under false assumptions.

Sure, it makes perfect financial and business sense to release the MP component if they felt it below quality to such a degree as to impact the quality of the rest of the game, but jeeze, they should have been more forthcoming.
Ozymandous is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 10:59   #82
Wexu
Warlord
 
Wexu's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 142
IIRC, they have never said MP WILL BE IN, so...
Wexu is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 11:02   #83
BigLupu
Settler
 
Local Time: 16:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12
Check out the Civ3 page on bestbuy.com
http://www.bestbuy.com/software/Deta...023&e=11072164

Civilization III
Minimum PC System Requirements:
...
Multiplayer Internet: No
Multiplayer Network: No


for comparison:

Civilization: Call to Power
Minimum PC System Requirements:
...
Multiplayer Internet: Yes
Modem: 28.8 Kbps, Internet (TCP/IP) and LAN (IPX and TCP/IP) play supported
BigLupu is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 11:09   #84
Wexu
Warlord
 
Wexu's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 142
What's the big deal? I don't understand why people are so angry because Firaxis didn't want to add ordinary crappy Civ-style multiplayer to the game.

As I've said earlier, if they'll come with new good ideas how to impelement multiplayer to Civ (WHICH IS CLEARLY SINGLEPLAYER GAME), then it'll be worth couple of bucks, BUT if they add this ordinary multiplayer to the game, then it definetly should be free.
Wexu is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 11:12   #85
Steve Clark
King
 
Steve Clark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,555
Quote:
Originally posted by SITS
I think some people are missing the point here. They say that it is better to have a SP game than one that includes a half-arsed MP which, to me doesn't make sense. What Firaxis should do is produce a complete game not half of one. A complete game has both SP and MP options, both well written and that cater for both types of players. They have chosen not to at the expense of MP. They still haven't written it up on the official site, they still haven't given an explanation for the half the game missing. That is shoddy and a terrible way to treat their customers. But hey does it matter? I will still buy the game and the worst thing about that for me is that I wish I had strength of yin not to buy the game and it shames me that I don't. This has left a nasty taste in my mouth.

As to the SPers rejoicing I suggest you imagine Firaxis releasing Civ3 without SP but just MP. How would you feel then?
Certainly not in 21 months. Most complex games usually take a minimum of 3 years (many of the MMP games have taken 4 from inititial design). I am surprised that they were able to even do a SP version in 21 months, esp. with all of the artwork that they felt had to be done.
Steve Clark is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 11:25   #86
drake
King
 
drake's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Maine, US
Posts: 2,372
Quote:
I am surprised that they were able to even do a SP version in 21 months, esp. with all of the artwork that they felt had to be done.
Artwork? Artwork!?!??

Civ has never been about pretty graphics and all that bs. They could have spent the same time they did on "artwork" on something more worthwhile.

Goddam graphics do not make a game more fun. They never have.
__________________
I see the world through bloodshot eyes
Streets filled with blood from distant lies.
drake is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 11:44   #87
Steve Clark
King
 
Steve Clark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,555
Like the AI? You know I agree with you, esp in light that such things are and should be changeable or customizable. I had posted a long time ago that they should have just given us the basic units and terrain graphics and let the mod community take over from there. That way, they could have spent more of their limited time on the AI and on MP.

I've got to dig up one of my old signatures:

"We are going to wish Firaxis had spent more resources on the AI instead of on artwork."
Steve Clark is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 11:50   #88
drake
King
 
drake's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Maine, US
Posts: 2,372
Hey I'll agree to that.....I'd be impressed if the AI was a challenge. Hell I might even play a few AI games

It just seems the priorities were out of whack...graphics, smiling civ leaders and 3d graphics are nice for the kids, but they will all become invisible after people play the game a few times....

Solid gameplay, a challenging and adaptive AI AND multiplaying capability is what will make this game a long time winner for firaxis.......
__________________
I see the world through bloodshot eyes
Streets filled with blood from distant lies.
drake is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 11:51   #89
CobraA1
Chieftain
 
CobraA1's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: North of the Arctic Circle, south of Canada; Minnesota, USA
Posts: 99
They've rewritten the AI from scratch . . .
__________________
"If a man does not keep pace with his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music he hears, however measured or far away" --Henry David Thoreau
CobraA1 is offline  
Old October 11, 2001, 12:29   #90
Dugrik
Call to Power PBEMCivilization III PBEM
Prince
 
Dugrik's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:26
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 880
Quote:
Originally posted by PrinceBimz
I for one don't have time for multiplayer. I vote no for it. When CIV1 and CIV2 was originally released it was a single player game. It don't bother me one way or another if it remains a single player game.
Neither do I. That's why I play by email (PBEM). Get yourself into four or five games at once and a turn will always be waiting for you when you get home and you get your quiet time.

I hope that Firaxis's mp patch will include PBEM capability.
Dugrik is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team