CIV3 sucks .... CTP is much better

GMOsco · October 14, 2001, 17:45

No multiplayer thats just bullshit ... i was not even aware you could play this type of game single player, who's going to sit there and play this game single player.... at least CTP has multiplayer and for this type of game there simply is no other way to play it and if your one of those who just play single player and you don't care about multiplayer then your nothin but a ****er or your 5 years old or at least your interlect is anyway.....
Don't buy this game its an insult to put it out without multiplayer and no body is interested in what you have to say is you don't play multiplayer so don't bother replying, just the fact that you don't care about multiplayer tells all i need to know about you... you have failed in life give it up you don't have a clue.
CIV sucks.

Akron · October 14, 2001, 17:51

Ooooh... I feel so insulted!

If you are gonna post this crap, at least try to sound intelligent. Your post was nothing but a load of insults.

Someone close this thread. We don't need these stupid destructive arguments here.

d_dudy · October 14, 2001, 17:53

now, i don't think ANYONE here takes mp THAT seriously

btw, are you a new troll, or a dl?

Crouchback · October 14, 2001, 17:54

Unlike you I've not played Civ3 yet GMOsco, but even without MP I'll still say you're wrong. CTP was badly unbalanced in it's use of unconventional units and bombard capacity. Even in MP it was ridiculous.

David

Ralf · October 14, 2001, 17:56

Quote:

Originally posted by GMOsco
you have failed in life give it up you don't have a clue.

What are you talking about?

Simpleton · October 14, 2001, 18:01

Ha! What a dullard.

I've seen better arguments in my bowl of Alpha-Bits!!!!

CapTVK · October 14, 2001, 18:06

CIV3 sucks .... CTP is much better

Finally a statement were both MP'ers and SP'ers agree to disagree on!

BURN HIM ON THE STAKE!!!

monkspider · October 14, 2001, 18:06

I have a feeling this was an attempt to make a mockery of some of the hardcore MP grognards.

player1 · October 14, 2001, 18:07

Yes, I do love to play CTP1 & CTP2,
but lets be realistic.
Civ3 will probably be much better game.

Reasons:
-CTP1 wasn't POLISHED
-CTP2 wasn't FINISHED

Vault Dweller · October 14, 2001, 18:10

Quote:

Originally posted by GMOsco
No multiplayer thats just bullshit ... i was not even aware you could play this type of game single player, who's going to sit there and play this game single player.... at least CTP has multiplayer and for this type of game there simply is no other way to play it and if your one of those who just play single player and you don't care about multiplayer then your nothin but a ****er or your 5 years old or at least your interlect is anyway.....
Don't buy this game its an insult to put it out without multiplayer and no body is interested in what you have to say is you don't play multiplayer so don't bother replying, just the fact that you don't care about multiplayer tells all i need to know about you... you have failed in life give it up you don't have a clue.
CIV sucks.

LOL I find it rather humorous at how you attempt to belittle the intellect of those here, when you abhorrent spelling and grammar gives us a window to yours.

Have you even played CTP? It is terribly unbalanced and boring and MP is so unstable that you can only play for a few minutes without a problem.

I think you are just trying to jump on the bash Firaxis because of no Multiplay bandwagon to get attention. Civ never was much good with multiplay anyway too much time waiting for your enemies to make their moves and micromanaging.

MarkG · October 14, 2001, 18:12

if you need a reason for this closure, let me know...