November 16, 2001, 02:05
|
#1
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 11:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 61
|
Warmonger: Despotism vs Monarchy
As Rome I have been in constant war for entire game and it is now 200 ad. I cleared continent of Egypt and greece on regent. Whats best for someone who is fighting a constant war like rome? I am in middle ages thinking of staying in despotism and invading russian continent. Wonder if benifits outweigh costs..hmm.  What government to choose , I have republic and monarchy but tempted to just stay as a despot. I liek idea of rushing things and losing pop in my captured cities.
Last edited by Leonid; November 16, 2001 at 02:12.
|
|
|
|
November 16, 2001, 03:17
|
#2
|
Deity
Local Time: 09:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 17,354
|
good question
not enough analysis has been done on monarchy and despotism. But I would think communism is better on all aspects. You can still rush build with population and corruption is slightly better- so your science rate should be better.
I can never get a good science rate with despotism. but if I'm in the middle of a war I don't change out. I'll usually change to monarchy before attacking my next enemy though.
__________________
Focus, discipline
Barack Obama- the antichrist
|
|
|
|
November 16, 2001, 03:57
|
#3
|
Emperor
Local Time: 18:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 3,218
|
Monarchy gives extra food & prduction (ignores despotisam penality).
Also unit upkeep won't be to much bigger.
So only question is:
Will you sacrifice gold or people.
I personaly choose gold (monarchy), but if I am in war & have taken hostile cities I'll stay in Despotism (to sacrifice some enemy popultion for units).
Better question is:
Monarchy vs Communism (pretty similar)
or:
Forced Labor vs Paid Labor (while waging war)
|
|
|
|
November 16, 2001, 23:58
|
#4
|
Prince
Local Time: 00:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Singapore
Posts: 654
|
Monarchy vs Communism:
I noticed that if you build a courthouse in a city near the capital in Monarchy, there may not be a decrease in corruption.
In Communism, courthouses work in every city because corruption is spread out.
And if the improved espionage ability in Communism works, then Communism may be a better choice for war.
|
|
|
|
November 17, 2001, 01:02
|
#5
|
King
Local Time: 08:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,079
|
communism is probably the closest thing we have to fundamentilism from civ2, for the end game conquer all gov.
as i wrote in another thread, rush building requires pop points with communism, but if you own the longevity wonder your population grows 2 points instead of 1! That's very powerful with plenty of food, which is the type of city you would be rushing stuff anyway (more food less shields)
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:54.
|
|