Thread Tools
Old November 19, 2001, 07:04   #31
Akaoz
Prince
 
Akaoz's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 457
Glad we could help...

-Alech
__________________
"Build Ports when possible. A port gives you extra resources, as well as an extra tile for a unit to stand on." - Infogrames
Akaoz is offline  
Old November 19, 2001, 10:43   #32
CAB
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 17:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Sweden
Posts: 91
I'm currently using an AMD 1400MHz with 266MHz FSB and 512MB 266MHz RDram.

The game flows great and I play on a large huge map with 12 civs. I have almost no delay at all, perhaps a ten seconds or so and I am in late industrual age now.

Though enemy moves are a pain in the "bottom".
CAB is offline  
Old November 19, 2001, 11:08   #33
TheDarkside
Civilization IV Creators
Prince
 
TheDarkside's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 586
I'm telling you, Firaxis is using us to solve the ancient Towers of Hanoi problem during the time you think the AI is doing it's turn... or maybe they were funded by SETI to gradually allocate resources on our machines as the game progresses towards processing their raw satellite data. I shall release a report entitled "Covert Distributed Computing".

No really, it's silly how long it takes for the AI to take it's turn! My system is not the fastest, but my turn actions are responsive and quick. I run a database off my sytem with almost 1,000 tables and tens of thousands of records that never has delays as long as this, even if I process entire tables using inefficent techniques like brute force search.
TheDarkside is offline  
Old November 19, 2001, 18:24   #34
Akaoz
Prince
 
Akaoz's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 457
Is there any chance they can fix this? It is really putting me off playing...

-Alech
__________________
"Build Ports when possible. A port gives you extra resources, as well as an extra tile for a unit to stand on." - Infogrames
Akaoz is offline  
Old November 19, 2001, 19:20   #35
Bakunine
Warlord
 
Bakunine's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portugal
Posts: 139
Quote:
Originally posted by Akaoz
Is there any chance they can fix this?
-Alech
Must be or otherwise their ...
__________________
I do not want to achieve immortality threw my work. I want to achieve it threw not dying - Woody Allen
Bakunine is offline  
Old November 19, 2001, 19:35   #36
nickersonm
Civilization II MultiplayerAlpha Centauri PBEM
Settler
 
nickersonm's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: WA State, USA
Posts: 9
I'm pretty sure that memory is the major factor here. I am playing a game on a 256x256 map w/ 12 or so civs, and there are 2-5 minute waits in the aincient ages. However, I only have a Athlon 650MHZ with 128MB of PC133 RAM. My friend with a P41.4GHz and 512MB RDRAM800 experiences only 20 second delays at the releatively same time period, but with more units+cities.

I also found that the number of civs really affects the delay. 16 is unmanagable on my computer, on almost any sized map, but reduce it to 12, and it is loads faster. Reduce it one more, and it's very managable (for a little bit, at least) on 256x256.

- nickersonm
nickersonm is offline  
Old November 19, 2001, 21:15   #37
jonasf
Settler
 
Local Time: 09:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 5
I run an Athlon XP1600 with 1Gb RAM
My machine is an Athlon 1600 with 1Gb RAM and a GeForce 3 TI graphics card and windows 2000.

i can tell you that the game is so slow it is not even possible to play it on this machine... And it supposed to be a really fast machine in todays market(it does give me over 100fps in other games...).

The only people I've heard that get good performance is people that use a system based on the windows95 core, like windows98 or ME. People using the 2000 core, XP for example get HORRIBLE performance!!!

For some reason this fast machine of mine runs the game much SLOWER than my old pentium II 300MHz laptop, so I use the laptop to play the game.... Doesn't make much sense does it???

This game is buggy as hell and I wonder if they actually ever played it themselves... if they did they must have seen that things were not working..... It just isn't playable on anything but tiny maps...
jonasf is offline  
Old November 19, 2001, 21:29   #38
star mouse
Civilization III Democracy Game
Prince
 
star mouse's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:01
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: of the Barbarians
Posts: 600
I wonder if what we're seeing here is an example of the computation problems associated with NP-completeness. An NP problem is something where computation of a dataset of size "n" can only be computed in a time that is proportional to n! (n factorial). Such problems become impossible to compute even for small values of 'n' (less than 100).

Testing the connectivity of the trade network may be an example of this. During a turn, every player must test the connectivity of its trade network with every other player. This could be why people playing with a lot of civs in particular are noticing slow turns.
__________________
None, Sedentary, Roving, Restless, Raging ... damn, is that all? Where's the "massive waves of barbarians that can wipe out your civilisation" setting?
star mouse is offline  
Old November 19, 2001, 21:58   #39
John-SJ
Alpha Centauri PBEMCivilization II Succession Games
Emperor
 
John-SJ's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Silicon Valley, USA
Posts: 3,171
Mouse,

You might be right, especially if the algorithm used is based on the unit pathing algorithm which is horrifically SLOW!

John-SJ
John-SJ is offline  
Old November 20, 2001, 04:25   #40
Kaesar
Settler
 
Local Time: 17:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Surrey, BC, Canada
Posts: 22
The time problem people are experiencing on huge maps occured even back in civ2, it's not a bug, it's just the sheer number of units that are created when you have a huge map. I'm playing a civ3 game continental huge map myself and it does take a lot of time between turns. I control probably 20% of the map with about 50 cities. There's probably close to 300 cities on the map and a quick estimate will probably tell you there are probably 2000 units in the game. Ever tried to play a RTS game with 2000 independent units? Doesn't exist. It's not the cpu. It's not the graphics card(although you should turn off animation. It's not that it is gpu intensive, it's just that it takes time to show the animation) CPU speed doesn't really help because it's not complex calculations. A little basic CPU architecture knowledge will tell you that a P4 2G will make little difference for this game than a P3 500. The calculations required to make the moves is similar to what's needed to run a spread sheet with a thousand functions. So I really don't see anyway Firaxis can fix this.
Kaesar is offline  
Old November 20, 2001, 05:48   #41
dexter4dxm
Warlord
 
dexter4dxm's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 279
Quote:
Originally posted by ElitePersian
Well, i bet Firaxis is already paying the price for this, i'll bet a lotta ppl arent playing the game anymore cause of the slow turns - that shows really how long some ppl have to wait in between turns.
how does that make them pay the price? they have our money, and they aren't giving it back. if you mean they are paying the price already because legions of loyal fans are now cursing their name, then okay i agree with you (although i doubt they even care. i guess we'll see when the patch comes out.)
dexter4dxm is offline  
Old November 21, 2001, 01:39   #42
ElitePersian
Prince
 
Local Time: 17:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 326
Quote:
Originally posted by dexter4dxm


how does that make them pay the price? they have our money, and they aren't giving it back. if you mean they are paying the price already because legions of loyal fans are now cursing their name, then okay i agree with you (although i doubt they even care. i guess we'll see when the patch comes out.)
thats exactly what i mean - word gets outs, ppl dont buy game.
ElitePersian is offline  
Old November 21, 2001, 01:49   #43
tmarcl
Warlord
 
tmarcl's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 146
Oddly enough, I'm not having too many problems. I'm playing on a large map with 9 civs, and the wait is only a few seconds between turns-even in the Modern Era. I did have problems with 16 civs though-half an hour wait between turns.

One thing that's helped, as someone else has mentioned-shut down all your background programs so that only Explorer and Systray are running. Granted, that doesn't do much for the 16 civ games, but it helps on the lesser amounts. For the record, I have a 333mhz processor-just above minimum requirements.

Marc
tmarcl is offline  
Old November 21, 2001, 19:31   #44
SirSebastian
Chieftain
 
SirSebastian's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 76
hmm....


Well... I happen to be running on a PII- 300mhz with 128 megs of RAM. Standard map, 8 civs... sure... later on it can take 2 minutes for the AI's turn... but... it never seemed unbearable. I have no innate desire to play on a Huge map like the rest of you though.. it seems... pointless and silly.
SirSebastian is offline  
Old November 24, 2001, 21:24   #45
Akaoz
Prince
 
Akaoz's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 457
*bump*

This question comes up a lot...

-Alech
__________________
"Build Ports when possible. A port gives you extra resources, as well as an extra tile for a unit to stand on." - Infogrames
Akaoz is offline  
Old November 24, 2001, 21:59   #46
7EA
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 19:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Denmark
Posts: 55
I use Windows ME and have a Celeron 533MHz clocked to 850MHz with 128Mb RAM and Radeon 7200 graphic card.

With 8 civs on standard map in late industrial age it runs quite alright. I have no complaints at all, but perhaps it will slowdown if I play on huge with 16 civs.

As someone else mentioned it may have something to do with the OS. If that is the case then it seems we all have to use ME.
7EA is offline  
Old November 25, 2001, 05:58   #47
Styx
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 17:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 56
I have a PIII 800mhzEB 1gyg SDRAM windows2000Pro
Asus V7100 videocard, soundblaster live.

I have the same problem, hughe maps seem unplayable later on in the game.
Remarkable that the saved file takes a long time to load also.
They have to solve it, its not the movement, I turned all off including sound.
Maybe a lower resolution will work, haven,t tried that yet.
Styx is offline  
Old November 25, 2001, 06:43   #48
Deathray
Warlord
 
Local Time: 17:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: High Wycombe
Posts: 104
Ok, I have an Athlon 1.2 Ghz, 256 mb DDR Ram and a 64mb Kyro II based graphics card (forgot the name). Started with Windows 98 SE. Anyway, I was running Civ 3 happilly for a few games, I always play on 16 Civ Huge map. When I got near the end of my fourth game, however, the thing started to get progressively slower. Anyway, after completing the game, it was about twice as slow as usual (still very bearable). So, I restarted the computer, reloaded and voila! It was fine. There is a know memory leak bug with Windows 95/98, so I think that was my problem. I now play Civ 3 by using Linux to emulate Windows 98, and its running faster than ever.
__________________
Never underestimate the healing powers of custard.
Deathray is offline  
Old November 25, 2001, 10:04   #49
Akka
Prince
 
Akka's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: In front of my computer.
Posts: 512
Quote:
Originally posted by Kaesar
The time problem people are experiencing on huge maps occured even back in civ2, it's not a bug, it's just the sheer number of units that are created when you have a huge map. I'm playing a civ3 game continental huge map myself and it does take a lot of time between turns. I control probably 20% of the map with about 50 cities. There's probably close to 300 cities on the map and a quick estimate will probably tell you there are probably 2000 units in the game. Ever tried to play a RTS game with 2000 independent units? Doesn't exist. It's not the cpu. It's not the graphics card(although you should turn off animation. It's not that it is gpu intensive, it's just that it takes time to show the animation) CPU speed doesn't really help because it's not complex calculations. A little basic CPU architecture knowledge will tell you that a P4 2G will make little difference for this game than a P3 500. The calculations required to make the moves is similar to what's needed to run a spread sheet with a thousand functions. So I really don't see anyway Firaxis can fix this.
Well, listen, if a computer can run a RTS (remember : REAL TIME) with 1500+ units, it should be a breeze for it to run even 5000 units in a turn-based.

"Ever tried to play a RTS game with 2000 independent units? Doesn't exist."

Sorry to disapoint you, dude : TA runs on a P166, and with a mere P2 400 you can run it with 800 units. On my Duron, I can run it with 2500 units.
Starcraft can have up to 300-400 units for each player (zerglings), and it run REAL-TIME fast on a Celeron 400-500.

All this, and the fact that people seems to have trouble with high-end systems while some other run normally with low-end system, tends to make me think it's not a CPU-related problem.


Quote:
Ok, I have an Athlon 1.2 Ghz, 256 mb DDR Ram and a 64mb Kyro II based graphics card (forgot the name). Started with Windows 98 SE. Anyway, I was running Civ 3 happilly for a few games, I always play on 16 Civ Huge map. When I got near the end of my fourth game, however, the thing started to get progressively slower. Anyway, after completing the game, it was about twice as slow as usual (still very bearable). So, I restarted the computer, reloaded and voila! It was fine. There is a know memory leak bug with Windows 95/98, so I think that was my problem. I now play Civ 3 by using Linux to emulate Windows 98, and its running faster than ever.
Well, it seems that I am perhaps right. This guy is not having issue with speed. And he has a Kyro rather than a nVidia chip. I would like to know what is the video card of all the people having trouble with extremely slow games.
I would like also to know if the slowness happen while you SEE the computer moving its units (then it's really probably a video card issue) or if you just have to wait in front of your computer waiting for something to happen (then could be a AI bug or something related to calculus).
__________________
Science without conscience is the doom of the soul.
Akka is offline  
Old November 25, 2001, 10:28   #50
moomin
Alpha Centauri Democracy GameACDG Planet University of TechnologyACDG The Cybernetic Consciousness
King
 
moomin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Moo Like In Moomin
Posts: 1,579
Let me just throw in this little trick here:

Download and install the no-cd patch. It made my games (huge, 16 civs) run 10x faster, or something like that.

System: Athlon 1600+, 1 GB RAM, GFORCE2/64MX and 1 GB dedicated swap partition. Win98SE for gaming.

Play is endurable, if not exactly speedy, now.
__________________
"The number of political murders was a little under one million (800,000 - 900,000)." - chegitz guevara on the history of the USSR.
"I think the real figures probably are about a million or less." - David Irving on the number of Holocaust victims.
moomin is offline  
Old November 25, 2001, 10:34   #51
protista
Settler
 
Local Time: 12:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 24
I am running a PIII 733 w/256K 133HZ ram. Everything seems to run fairly well, but I rarely play with more than three civilizations, as it seems the challenge is greater with a few selected ones.

My graphics drivers are the original ones, I did not update the Nvidia drivers at all. Many systems have system specific video drivers, which are optimized for the setup. It may be possible to download the original drivers.

One thing you might try is to close down all non essential applications, including the so called "intelligent" or "internet" keyboard apps, messenger programs, as well as anything else you can. I found early on with Ultima9, that the "intelligent" keyboard apps/drivers really slowed things down.

I suspect the problem lies in two areas, for those experiencing it.
One: some kind of bug or problem with later graphics chips/drivers, such as nvidia.
Two: a memory leak which is greatly accentuated when running huge maps with many civs.

Hopefully Firaxis will address this problem quickly. This is a super simulation, but problems such as this will sour people quickly.
protista is offline  
Old November 25, 2001, 10:58   #52
Bricktop
Settler
 
Local Time: 09:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1
These are the two things that i do to help with the frustrating lagggg. First, CTRL-SHIFT-M. I use this shortcut all the time. It shuts off the map for the cities. When i want to see something on the cities on the map, I turn it on.

Like before the start of the next turn when it asks you to hit the spacebar, i turn it on to make sure that my cities aren't going to produce a swordsman. this is my pet peeve with the game. I'm producing modern infantry, i have 4 tanks surrounding the square so as not to piss off the town's occupants that the city is too crowded, and the AI assumes (I'm guessing) that I'm leaving my town defenseless and wants me to make swordsman to defend the town. Yeah, i have the option to make Marines, Friggin' ICBM's, Powerful Tanks...sure, i'll go braindead for awhile and produce swordmen, or catapults or those weak B-17's. Anyway, i got sidetracked, but that just irks me.

Back to CTRL-SHIFT-M. Other than the end of turns, and key points during my original moves (basically for orientation) it stays off. The key is to make sure that it's off when the automated moves start. If not, god help you. i got so frustrated with it last night during the move animations, when I forgot to CTRL-SHIFT-M, I almost CTRL-ALT-DELETE'D out of the game.

Another thing, I saw one of the guys complain about hitting the "g" key and being frustrated with the computer calculating his moves. This is what i do and it helps tremendously. Pick the square you want your unit to move too before you hit "g" and rest your mouse on that square. Now hit "g" and move your mouse slightly. The move line will appear and it won't get that movement lag.

I love this game. I'm new to the Civ series, but this game is the Shiznit. It can be frustrating as hell too though.

Hope this helps someone.
Bricktop is offline  
Old November 25, 2001, 13:14   #53
CHaNT
Settler
 
Local Time: 18:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Pamplona
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally posted by ElitePersian


thats exactly what i mean - word gets outs, ppl dont buy game.

Exactly, i live in Spain, i´ve been waiting months for the game to arrive here, last friday it arrived... and i didn´t buy it. And i won´t until slow turns, bugs, AI and everything is fixed.

Thanks to all the people that has talked about the many problems the game has. They´ve prevented me from buying an unfinished game. If Firaxis wants my money, they have to deserve it
CHaNT is offline  
Old November 25, 2001, 14:05   #54
wal35
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 17:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 38
Well my 1 year old PC 900MHz Athlon, 384Mb RAM, Geforce2MX, Win98 runs Civ3 perfectly first time straight out of the box.

No scrolling problem, no refresh problem, no AI turn problem, I've got it to mid 1800s on standard map with 8 civs (actually only 6 now ) and as I said everything is fine.

Just to confuse matters too I haven't stripped my PC down - still running SETI client, ZoneAlarm firewall, etc etc in system tray.

What problem
__________________
Hoping that 4 is closer to 2 than 3
wal35 is offline  
Old November 25, 2001, 15:06   #55
-AC-
Settler
 
Local Time: 17:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 9
The reason: trade/road network
Ok, he's my analyzis of the problem.

1) The slowdown will happen with large and huge maps. Maybe with smaller sizes when they're fully settled.

2) Slowdown occurs whenever there is a major change in the trade network.

3) There is no way to cure this (without a patch, maybe not even with one).

The way the game works is that it will build a weighted graph out of the squares, with the corresponding weight for each connection from the square to another (railroad=0, road 1/3, airport/harbour = -1, no improvements=given terrain move rate). This net is then used to determine a) if a city is connected to the resource/trade network and b) unit movement.

Now, depending on the algorithm used, the adding of a new connection is either fast or slow. Apparently whoever coded this implementation of the graph, used some very bad method to add (or remove!) a new connection that majorly changes the trade network.

I think what happens is that it will start building the trade network again from scratch, whenever a city is connected/disconnected to the network (or when a connecting improvement is built). This will drastically slow down the computer turn/build turn.

Now whenever the computer/player uses the 'Go' order to move a unit, the computer will use an algorithm to calculate the shortest route. This is generally much faster than changing the network, which is why it will only take less than a second (short trip) to couple seconds (=very long move). This might slow down the game a bit, but not drastically.

Ok, this 'analyzis' is probably not correct to the very details, but the basic reason is there: changing the trade network takes too much computing from the CPU, which causes a drastic performance drop.

However, a better implementation of the trade network is possible. Question is, can or will this be done by the developers, or are they aware of the problem or the reason for it. I'm going to e-mail to them and ask about this and maybe even help to solve it if they're not aware of it yet...
-AC- is offline  
Old November 25, 2001, 19:54   #56
Akaoz
Prince
 
Akaoz's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 457
Quote:
Originally posted by wal35
Well my 1 year old PC 900MHz Athlon, 384Mb RAM, Geforce2MX, Win98 runs Civ3 perfectly first time straight out of the box.

No scrolling problem, no refresh problem, no AI turn problem, I've got it to mid 1800s on standard map with 8 civs (actually only 6 now ) and as I said everything is fine.

Just to confuse matters too I haven't stripped my PC down - still running SETI client, ZoneAlarm firewall, etc etc in system tray.

What problem
READ BEFORE YOU POST! This is a problem on HUGE maps with 16 civs!

-AC-: Thank you. I think you nailed it. But the question remains: Can it be fixed...

-Alech
__________________
"Build Ports when possible. A port gives you extra resources, as well as an extra tile for a unit to stand on." - Infogrames
Akaoz is offline  
Old November 25, 2001, 20:45   #57
GMguy16
Settler
 
Local Time: 11:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4
I have a AMD Thunderbird 1.2GHz @ 1.5GHz with 256 Megs 2100 DDR and a Geforce2 Pro. The game runs great with about 15-20 seconds in between turns in the modern age, with a huge map, and 15 Civs. There is about a 1-2 second delay when capturing a city. With the amount of civs, units, AI strategy, and cities its processing, I can understand some peoples problems. I dont think it really can be fixed without making the game worse, and I know getting another computer isn't optional for most but I built my computer for $420 and it rocks...for a much slower Intel processor like the 2Ghz I would have paid that much just for the processor. Anything under 500 Mhz. seriously needs to be upgraded soon for any serious modern gaming. My friends 750 Duron plays this very well too and he only paid $30 dollars for his processor. So buying a new computer might not be that big of a deal.
GMguy16 is offline  
Old November 26, 2001, 09:10   #58
-AC-
Settler
 
Local Time: 17:01
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 9
Also forgot to mention:

Declaring war will cause a major slowdown because the trade network needs to be adjusted accordingly.
-AC- is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:01.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team