Thread Tools
Old April 4, 2000, 23:25   #1
tniem
King
 
Local Time: 19:17
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Hope College
Posts: 2,232
Ideas to Change Population
First of all, don't get me wrong I love Civ I and II, logged many hours, but for me if Civ III is not different I probably won't spend that much time with it. There is only a limited amount that better graphics and added units, technologies, etc do for me.

That is why I believe that the population of your nation needs to be radically changed. Here are a few basic ideas that I would like to see put in to Civ III in terms of the population make-up of your empire.

1) Ethniticity. Ethnic backgrounds affect happiness and the way people live. Obviously Firaxis needs to be careful and not have the English hate the Celts or Irish or whatever, but maybe anytime a nation attacks you and appears to be hostile, the ethnic backgrounds grow revengeful to each other.

2) Immigrants. Cities should grow with population from other nations if the city is prospering and happy. If a neighbor is fighting a war and the city of Calcutta is under attack, a certain percentage of the population should flee and go to a near by city to escape. This could be both a friendly city or enemy, examples of late would include the whole mess in Kosovo or in Africa.

3) No numbers for population representation. You should not have a city of 3, but instead 65,374. This would add complexity to the game. Then you can have percentages of the population being happy (12%), content (61%), and rioting (27%). Again the percentages should go to ethniticities with an English population (65%), Indian (10%), German (7%), Russian (6%), etc.

4) Count the country. It was not until the 20th Century that the majority of the population lived in cities. In civilization this number changes to when you start. While the population in the country may or may not affect play, it should at least be counted in both make-up of ethniticity and in official population ratings.

That about wraps it up in my ideas at this time. Tell me if I am totally off base, but I would like to see some changes. Truthfully I played Civ II much less than Civ I because it seemed too much like the original.
tniem is offline  
Old April 5, 2000, 00:15   #2
MidKnight Lament
King
 
MidKnight Lament's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:17
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,235
Welcome! Great to see another new Apolyton member with plenty of ideas. I suggest you go back and read a few threads though, because all of these ideas have debated over the past few weeks. A good place to start would be the Essential Civ 3 List.

Look forward to hearing from you on the forums in the future.

- MKL
MidKnight Lament is offline  
Old April 5, 2000, 13:25   #3
tniem
King
 
Local Time: 19:17
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Hope College
Posts: 2,232
MKL-

I know. After I ranted and raved in this post, I went back and read a lot of what you and a few others have written. Nice to know that there are others that think some of the same things that I do.
tniem is offline  
Old April 6, 2000, 05:37   #4
MidKnight Lament
King
 
MidKnight Lament's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:17
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,235
I was trying hard not to sound like I was having a go at you

Great to have you aboard.

- MKL
MidKnight Lament is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:17.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team