November 28, 2001, 23:31
|
#1
|
Prince
Local Time: 11:40
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 532
|
nuke-a-forming
So I was playing around with nuclear weapons earlier (forgot what mom said about playing with thermonuclear fire...). I got curious to see if tundra got turned into desert, because desert in the (ant)arctic would be weird. So I played around. nuke-a-forming results:
Old->New
-------------
Plains -> Desert
Grassland -> Plains
Tundra -> Tundra
Desert -> Desert
We all knew these. However, you might not know this:
Jungle -> Grassland (mostly. sometimes becomes plains. not sure why. I think it may have to do with latitude)
Forest on Plains -> Plains (haven't tried this; no available forest on plains; could become desert as above)
Forest on Grassland -> Grassland (maybe the same two step as before)
Forest on Tundra -> Tundra
But the best one of all? If you have plains by a river, and you nuke it, you get.... Flood Plain. Uh huh. So a plan occurs to me. Say I've got 6 plains on either side of a river. Along one side is grassland and more plains, only not bordering river, like:
|P|R|P|G
|P|R|P|G
|P|R|P|P
The bolded plain is my target. So I plant forest on the grasslands and plains to the east. Then I nuke right there in the middle. If all goes well, I now have:
|F|R|F|G
|F|R|F|G
|F|R|F|P
Along with a whole lot of pollution, of course. Naturally I have a bunch of settlers around to push into there and re-improve and clean up.
Now, if you nuke one of your own cities, you lose half population. If you nuke NEXT to one of your cities, you only lose 1 pop. Either way you get only 8 pollution squares. And remember that water doesn't get polluted. So if you've got a bunch of plains next to the sea with a river going through them....
Too bad nukes come so late. This would be handy.
|
|
|
|
November 28, 2001, 23:40
|
#2
|
Warlord
Local Time: 12:40
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ontario
Posts: 108
|
WOW that radiation must help grow super-crops! that explains the EXTRA food after a nuke!
|
|
|
|
November 29, 2001, 02:36
|
#3
|
King
Local Time: 09:40
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,079
|
interesting method to terraform. I'll have to give this a try; it's a shame though that we dont have a cheat mode to do it quickly
|
|
|
|
November 29, 2001, 03:21
|
#4
|
Prince
Local Time: 11:40
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 595
|
I wish you could level mountains with nukes. This was something that was actually seriously being considered in the 1950s here in America, when they were trying to find new uses for nuclear weapons.
|
|
|
|
November 29, 2001, 03:52
|
#5
|
Warlord
Local Time: 17:40
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: drifting across the sands of time....
Posts: 242
|
Hey, nuclear radiation is how Homer Simpson developed "Tomacco"!
|
|
|
|
November 29, 2001, 04:02
|
#6
|
Prince
Local Time: 11:40
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 532
|
I believe there was once a semi-serious suggestion to dig a canal using nuclear weapons. I don't think it was Panama, as we already had the canal well before atomic weapons were ever taken seriously, but that's the only thing that comes to mind.
|
|
|
|
November 29, 2001, 08:26
|
#7
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 17:40
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London
Posts: 31
|
And the Russians wanted to use nukes to create large underground cisterns. Perhaps they'll use Chernobyl to store grain
|
|
|
|
November 29, 2001, 10:33
|
#8
|
Warlord
Local Time: 17:40
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 158
|
Hmmm, terraforming. I miss those engineers in Civ2.... tundra is so useless and given enough engineers, they can become grassland
|
|
|
|
November 29, 2001, 13:03
|
#9
|
Settler
Local Time: 12:40
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8
|
Oh but I miss SMAC planet-bust-aforming .... I would like a nice lake [here].
__________________
<insert clever sig>
|
|
|
|
November 29, 2001, 18:35
|
#10
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 09:40
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Eugene OR
Posts: 31
|
The Soviets actually planned to use nukes to reverse the flow of rivers flowing to the Arctic to send them down to Khazakstan to irrirgate the steppes there.
I also miss the CivII Engineers, who could transform tundra into something useful. Workers are considerably less interesting in that regard.
__________________
Gary Frazier
Civ Freak from way back
|
|
|
|
November 29, 2001, 19:17
|
#11
|
Emperor
Local Time: 09:40
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: I live amongst the Red Sox Nation
Posts: 7,969
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Dyrlac
Oh but I miss SMAC planet-bust-aforming .... I would like a nice lake [here].
|
here here
__________________
Boston Red Sox are 2004 World Series Champions!
|
|
|
|
November 29, 2001, 21:51
|
#12
|
Settler
Local Time: 17:40
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8
|
that nuke-a-forming testing oughta be the craziest thing i read this far on this forum. Man... Not that it is useless, but holy crap !!! Were there farmers begging for a landpiece near Hiroshima the day after the big KABOOM ?
Incredible stuff...
Buckethead
|
|
|
|
November 30, 2001, 11:03
|
#13
|
Warlord
Local Time: 17:40
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 158
|
Yup, I miss those engineers.
Question -- do ALL the plains turn into floodplains, or just the ones next to the rivers??
|
|
|
|
November 30, 2001, 12:41
|
#14
|
Settler
Local Time: 12:40
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sherbrooke, Quebec, Can.
Posts: 23
|
__________________
what the ...?!? that was only luck!!
|
|
|
|
November 30, 2001, 15:36
|
#15
|
Prince
Local Time: 11:40
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 532
|
It wasn't a serious attempt to do this in a game, so I have no idea of the unrest effects.
Only plains with rivers become flood plains. Otherwise they become desert. Hence the need to protect with forests.
|
|
|
|
November 30, 2001, 17:33
|
#16
|
Warlord
Local Time: 11:40
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: de Tejas
Posts: 158
|
Well, the army currently does have low yield nukes that they would use for demolition in a war...quick way to clear landslides on a road, or make a path thru a forest. I don't really see it as cheating...not REALLY. Although the demo charges are REALLY low yield...i.e. wouldn't turn a 100 square mile grassland area into plains, but a multi-megaton weapon sure would...
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:40.
|
|