July 24, 2000, 23:12
|
#1
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 16:25
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 95
|
Maybe I am just being smug because I know (with a large degree of certainty) that my current computer will be above the required line for Civ3, but I say that Firaxis should feel free to make the requirements higher as long as it is for a worthy cause. That is I would feel reasonable about the 128 meg ram requirement if it was needed to allow us to play larger maps and have more civs in the game at the same time.
However, if the extra requirements go towards multimedia purposes such as making culture specific advisor movies, I would really be disappointed. I don't think that decorative stuff like that should have a significant effect on the game.
Anyways, just my 2 c.
------------------
Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
July 25, 2000, 00:36
|
#2
|
Guest
|
What should we expect in the way of technological requirments?
New games that come out now seem to average right around requiring p-200's with 32 ram and recommending p233's with 64.
Civ3, coming out in a year or so (year and a half, probably) the average game will require more like 266-300 probably. Will civ3 be similar, in require that much? And recommended 128 ram? What about modem speeds or DVD instead of regular CD-ROM format?
IMO, i think Firaxis shouldn't be afraid to push a little bit, as far as what the game will require, as long as it's worth it. AND as long as many options that would require more are turned off.
what are everyone elses thoughts on this?
|
|
|
|
July 25, 2000, 02:26
|
#3
|
King
Local Time: 00:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Reconstruction commissioner
Posts: 1,890
|
I agree- somewhere between P233-P333. I hope you're wrong about 128Mb RAM, but you're probably right.
Mind you, at the current rate of procrastination we'll all have 8GHz systems with 2Gb RAM.
|
|
|
|
July 25, 2000, 07:17
|
#4
|
Settler
Local Time: 00:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 4
|
Hi all!
I agree that FIRAX should not be over-careful, but do hope that they do not invest too much time into fancy graphics to use all those 3-D features available. The Civ-Series was never know for excellent graphics, but for the gameplay. So make the requirements what it takes to make it FUN!
Pondo
|
|
|
|
July 25, 2000, 08:35
|
#5
|
King
Local Time: 01:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Milano - Italy
Posts: 1,674
|
Civilization II and SMAC gain a tradition to be Notebook PC friendly.
I mean, that's a game that not only young and brave students can play from their powerful desktops, also commuters employeers like to play from a notebook on a train (sometime a notebook they got from company to finish that oh-so-urgent work ).
Maybe this notebook compliance largely depends on Brian Reynolds feeling (now that we all know he love notebook, see apolyton/misc link to "Reynolds on trade tool" article), and will end with the coming CIV III.
But I hope Firaxis (are you listening, sir?) will let us commuters to enjoy some game from a seat of the so-often-late trains without have to fork out for some 5.000$ system.
What a pity if I'll must limit myself back to some good book reading!
------------------
Admiral Naismith AKA mcostant
|
|
|
|
July 25, 2000, 19:44
|
#6
|
King
Local Time: 10:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,235
|
I hope not. I'd have a hard time justifying buying a new PC for just one game. (And if I'm honest with myself, that's probably what it would be.) But, you never know. They seemed pretty keen to have top of the line stuff.
- MKL
[This message has been edited by MidKnight Lament (edited July 25, 2000).]
|
|
|
|
July 25, 2000, 20:04
|
#7
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 00:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: La Jolla, Ca, US
Posts: 93
|
Guys, I expect that the games will become more and more equipment-expensive (sigh). It's going to hurt, having to shove out a few grand for a new computer every ten or fifteen years. Dang! Technology is moving too fast
It seems easy to say this sitting behind my dad's 400mHz-16.6GB HD-128MB RAM. However, I know I'll have to leave home one day and buy my own machine. And I don't want to have to pay big bucks to be able to crush my friends at multiplayer!
However, if the game will be equipment-intensive, I hope it will make the equipment cost worthwile. Otherwise, I'll drop Civ when I go off to college!
|
|
|
|
July 26, 2000, 01:00
|
#8
|
King
Local Time: 16:25
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,543
|
I'm gonna make sure my comp will be able to play Freelancer very fast at the maximum graphic and sound quality so Civ3 shouldn't be a problem. But I think it'll be around 266-333 or 266-400 but rec specs will be around 500-700 is my guess but by then we'll have 2ghz PCs so anyone who can't play the game should consider upgrading how expensive could a 400 PII be by then!!
------------------
King Par4!!
There is no spoon
-The Matrix
Let's kick it up a notch!!
-Emeril Lagasse
Fresh Soy makes Tofu so silky
-Ming Tsai
|
|
|
|
July 26, 2000, 02:01
|
#9
|
Prince
Local Time: 00:25
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 404
|
Par4 has a point. When this game (finally) hits the shelves, buying a PII 400 processor will be cheaper than the actual game. I don't think that any civ game will be high end on the hardware scale. They just don't need the rescources the first-persons, RTS's etc. need. I'd say 300Mhz max.
------------------
- Biddles
"Now that our life-support systems are utilising the new Windows 2027 OS, we don't have to worry about anythi......."
Mars Colonizer Mission
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:25.
|
|