Why did they take out Civil Wars?

Toasty · January 18, 2002, 20:28

I mean, I really loved those things! A whole new civilization for conquering a big city ^^. And it would be great if you didn't have the cultural thing. I mean, you could even have it for different Civilizations (i.e. Russians civil war vs. Soviets, America vs. Confederacy, France vs. French republic, etc.). I just really miss that aspect of the game, and it has played a major role in history.

H Tower · January 19, 2002, 00:42

a)they forgot
b)they were too lazy
c)its going to be in the expansion
d)they did it to spite you
e)they did it to spite me
f)they didn't think civs would grow large enough to have a civil war make sense
g)it might be too realistic
h)it might not be realistic enough
i)why have civil wars when you can be over run by corruption?

MattHiggs · January 19, 2002, 10:03

j) all of the above

H Tower · January 19, 2002, 13:28

ah yes, i forgot that one. thanks for pointing that out!