October 24, 2000, 20:00
|
#1
|
Guest
|
Cities in Disorder succeed from the Union
Here's a cool idea for Civ3! How about this? A city that has been in civil disorder long enough or just goes into severe civil disorder might succeed from the Union and form their own civilization, or join an existing civilization. The farther the city is from the capitol, the more likely that city will succeed if it falls into civil disorder. And if other cities near a city that succeeds fall into civil disorder, they are more likely succeed as well. When this happens, you can declare a civil war and try to get those cities back. This makes a lot of sense, for example: British cities become American cities, Spanish cities become Mexican Cities. American cities become Confederate cities, etc. There should be an option to not allow succeeding if the human player(s) do not prefer it for a particular game.
------------------
JRH
|
|
|
|
October 24, 2000, 20:02
|
#2
|
Emperor
Local Time: 19:30
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Glorious Land of Canada
Posts: 3,234
|
There's a similar discussion going on in the "Revolutions" thread. Go check it out!
|
|
|
|
October 24, 2000, 20:08
|
#3
|
Guest
|
How do I find the "Revolutions" thread?
------------------
JRH
|
|
|
|
October 24, 2000, 20:54
|
#4
|
Guest
|
oh, nevermind!
------------------
JRH
|
|
|
|
October 24, 2000, 22:21
|
#5
|
King
Local Time: 10:30
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,728
|
!
------------------
No, in Australia we don't live with kangaroos and koalas in our backyards... Despite any stupid advertisments you may see to the contrary...
|
|
|
|
October 24, 2000, 23:16
|
#6
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 00:30
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Kearns, Utah, USA
Posts: 86
|
I did a thread on this myself, not exactly like yours, but in the same idea, its at "Riots and Revolutions", it went nearly unawnsered. Go check it out if ya like.
|
|
|
|
October 25, 2000, 21:59
|
#7
|
King
Local Time: 16:30
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Dixon, CA USA
Posts: 1,156
|
Yeah, I had an idea just like that back when we were discussing what should be in CTP. No, really. I suggested having certain-named tribes split from the main one, like Confederates from Americans, Texans from Mexicans, Bavarians from Germans, etc, etc ,etc. and yes, I was ignored too!
|
|
|
|
October 26, 2000, 11:17
|
#8
|
King
Local Time: 01:30
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Milano - Italy
Posts: 1,674
|
Just for info, I noticed that posts referring to argument already debated some times ago, more often if included in "The List" or "Essential Civ", receive not many answers if any at all.
My suggestion is, when this happen, to take the hint and search deeply into the forum or to check "The List v.2" itself.
------------------
Admiral Naismith AKA mcostant
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:30.
|
|