I'm sorry Libertarian...

Spec · January 22, 2002, 15:25

Sorry about the earlier post man, it's just that whenever I post something, you have to put me down in someway, and I got tired of it. Maybe it's just me. That's all.

Libertarian · January 22, 2002, 15:34

I accept your apology, though none was necessary. I took no offense. God go with you.

Pembleton · January 22, 2002, 15:40

Quote:

Originally posted by Libertarian
I accept your apology, though none was necessary. I took no offense. God go with you.

But obviously he did feel like he was being "put down", otherwise he wouldn't have made his original post. Whether or not he's being too sensitive or not I don't know, but you might want to think about how your comments affect they way other people react, even if they are within "the rules" as the moderator has stated.

Unless of course you don't mind people being offended by your comments or feel that they shouldn't, then I guess there's no stopping you.

Libertarian · January 22, 2002, 15:44

Quote:

But obviously he did feel like he was being "put down", otherwise he wouldn't have made his original post.

Huh-uh. Homey don't play dat game.

Spec · January 22, 2002, 15:47

Quote:

Originally posted by Libertarian

Huh-uh. Homey don't play dat game.

And that means.....?

BTW it's That and not dat!

Pembleton · January 22, 2002, 15:48

Quote:

Originally posted by Libertarian
Huh-uh. Homey don't play dat game.

And although I did transgress a bit and play yours for a short while I won't play yours either. Good luck finding others to play your troll game with (which includes a lot of one-line posts), since you seem to enjoy it so much. You obviously don't want to or not able to find other things to do with your time.

Libertarian · January 22, 2002, 15:53

Spectator:

Quote:

And that means.....?

Inner-city slang. It means that I have no intention of falling into Pembleton's swirling eddy of logical fallacies. (For example, pinning upon me the responsibility for your post.) On the other hand, you have demonstrated an honorable humility, and are winning me over with your charm. It appears that you and I are on a path toward mutual respect — thanks to your initiative.

Spec · January 22, 2002, 16:04

Quote:

Originally posted by Libertarian
Spectator:

On the other hand, you have demonstrated an honorable humility, and are winning me over with your charm. It appears that you and I are on a path toward mutual respect — thanks to your initiative.

Me?......ummmm....well thanks.

but, what initiative? Sorry, I must be stupid.....I'm only Canadian.

Libertarian · January 22, 2002, 16:05

This thread.

Spec · January 22, 2002, 16:08

Ok that's what I thought, but get one thing right. If we get along, I'll be glad, but winning you over wasn't my goal. It just seemed like the right thing to do cuz my last post was childish. There.

Libertarian · January 22, 2002, 16:14

Fair enough.

Laocon · January 22, 2002, 16:20

...they all lived happily every after...

hmmm.... I think it goes both ways - unless someone is obviously trying to offend, it is probably safer to assume language barrier/stupidity/ignorance/all (or any) of the above have got in the way

and then dismiss it....!

Inference of tone is always a bad thing with written communications, it's just a shame that HTML doesn't have sarcasm tags!

Play safe, stay happy, live long...