Thread Tools
Old November 20, 2000, 00:36   #1
JEEVES
Settler
 
Local Time: 00:32
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: LA CROSSE, WI
Posts: 2
funding of city improvements
I propose getting rid of general maintanace costs and implementing funding. For instance, a library's effectiveness would depend on on the amount of funding. If it gets maximal (100%) it will be an excellent school, and enhance science production. If the school gets, say, 20% funding it will be poor and have a minimal effect on science. The same could be said for university, library, etc. There should be a minimal percentage for basic maintanace, but the rest of the funding goes to the quality of the improvement.

This would bring a welcome complexity to the game. It would make income and trade more important.

Another added complexity could be that of a localized economy. As in real life, high tech companies, need specialized people. In the game, a research center (or equivalent) could be built, but in order to run at peak efficiency, the city would need proper workers to work there. This is all of the top of my head. This stuff would bring some relief to the old basic system and equations.

I think the "rush buy" option should go. It doesn't make any sense. It isn't realistic at all.

JEEVES is offline  
Old November 20, 2000, 03:33   #2
Evil Capitalist
King
 
Evil Capitalist's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:32
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Reconstruction commissioner
Posts: 1,890
I'm not so sure- I think the autoselling of improvements is meant to signify recession, and as such is needed in the game. Although if funding were set on an empire wide level it could work.

And IMO rush buying is a valuable part of the city interface- politicans throwing money at a project until it goes away.
Evil Capitalist is offline  
Old November 20, 2000, 08:36   #3
UltraSonix
King
 
Local Time: 10:32
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,728
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the suggestion - it's actually quite good. But I like the way Civ2 works now... it's very easy to manage.

As as to the percentage funding proposal - I think it's more Sim City than civ - it seems to be focused on the cities too much.

------------------
No, in Australia we don't live with kangaroos and koalas in our backyards... Despite any stupid advertisments you may see to the contrary... (And no, koalas don't usually speak!)
UltraSonix is offline  
Old November 20, 2000, 14:21   #4
airdrik
Prince
 
airdrik's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:32
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nampa, ID, USA
Posts: 401
Actually it already has funding, to a degree. The science rate. The higher you put your science rate, the more 'funding' is given to your schools, libraries, etc. So I believe it is rather uneeded to have another 'funding' level in the game.
airdrik is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:32.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team