UN - mandate

Panag · February 17, 2002, 14:17

Hi ,

should this not be an option ?

Example's , the un should not lead to victory , it should have a body of lets say (given that you are with 16) 5 states , and you should be capable to do peace keeping , E by blockading ones trade routes , no war declared ,E by giving fines because a war that is to bloody , E asking for military assistance , E to give a nation a special resource , ETC , ..................;

have a nice day

Panag · February 17, 2002, 16:34

another thing ;

if cattle or wheat was tradable you could also embargo it , with nice results , a war without a war , hmmm , ......

scooter mk2 · February 17, 2002, 16:48

The UN in Civ3 is utterly useless IMO, so why change it? In its current form in the game it perfectly reflects the real life UN which is even more useless

Back to your suggestions, the only one I can say that would really seem stupid is the fines for a bloody war. The farthest the UN would ever go is sanctions as it cannot fine a nation very easily.

Panag · April 8, 2002, 06:31

hmmm ,

i just think that the UN , in civ3 should have some thing extra , just imagine , zulu against china , and then your troops , huh read un troops on their shores , ........back home your people are not war weary , lol , .....

trade embargo , this time forced , no waiting , for an embassy , héhéh.

and of course , hmmm , you need troops , the member top 5 can build them , for you , and last but not least , you pay zip for it !!!!

oh yeah , un can pass everywhere , and provokes no war , .....of course

Have a nice day

Inverse Icarus · April 8, 2002, 06:54

somewhere on this forum you'll find some great ideas on a completely functional UN... i froget what genius came up with it.

... maybe for civ 4... no ... sid lost his touch ... make the one's that follow him blindly bleed from the eyes ...

Panag · April 8, 2002, 09:33

Quote:

Originally posted by UberKruX
somewhere on this forum you'll find some great ideas on a completely functional UN... i froget what genius came up with it.

... maybe for civ 4... no ... sid lost his touch ... make the one's that follow him blindly bleed from the eyes ...

maybe the only thing that really matters in this game is money , selling an incomplete game , who's marketing is based on no 2 great results , ............

allas i came up with the un idea , so who can program some ideas ?

have a nice day

axis · April 8, 2002, 10:28

i actually kind of like what smax did with the planetary governor, give bonus trade based on peace treaties. if you are at peace with someone, you get bonus commerce based on that peace treaty. if you at war on the other hand, you get no bonus in trade. but seeing as civ 3 dosen't give out bonus trade based on peace treaties, or allies, i dont see how this could be realistically implemented into the game. good idea tho, and better than a simple win or lose as the current system dictates.

Panag · April 8, 2002, 10:45

hi ,

as i believe SMAC is totally different , on ai , and almost everthing else , hmmm , a trade bonus , yeah why not , on/off fuction do , for those of us who dont like it .

have a nice day